FPNote for DID Method Rubric v1.0 #365
Labels
Awaiting Publication
Approved by the Director, waiting on publication
Entering Note Track
First Public Group Note
Document title, URLs, estimated publication date
Abstract
The communities behind Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) bring together a diverse group of contributors who have decidedly different notions of exactly what "decentralization" means.
Rather than attempting to resolve this potentially unresolvable question, we propose a rubric — a scoring guide used to evaluate performance, a product, or a project — that teaches how to evaluate a given DID Method according to one's own requirements.
This rubric presents a set of criteria which an Evaluator can apply to any DID Method based on the use cases most relevant to them. We avoid reducing the Evaluation to a single number because the criteria tend to be multidimensional and many of the possible responses are not necessarily good or bad. It is up to the Evaluator to understand how each response in each criteria might illuminate favorable or unfavorable consequences for their needs.
While this rubric allows the evaluation of many aspects of decentralization of a DID Method, it is not exhaustive, and does not cover other factors that may affect selection or adoption of a particular Method, such as privacy, security, reliability, or efficiency.
Status
https://w3c.github.io/did-rubric/#sotd
Link to group's decision to request transition
https://www.w3.org/2019/did-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2021-08-17-did#resolution2
Information about implementations known to the Group (if relevant)
Not relevant.
@jandrieu @brentzundel @burnburn @msporny
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: