Which document would (formally) define the terms for vocabularies

[iherman]

(This is just a bookmark for ourselves to act upon when the time comes...)

At the moment, the formal vocabulary terms in the Security Vocabulary are defined in the DI spec. This includes terms like "authentication". I would think that, eventually, the formal definition of the term will be exclusively in the controller document; when that happens, the Security Vocabulary must be updated, too.

[iherman]

Ref to #10, too.

[iherman]

The issue was discussed in a meeting on 2024-06-19

• no resolutions were taken

View the transcript

3.7. Which document would (formally) define the terms for vocabularies (issue controller-document#18)

See github issue controller-document#18.

Brent Zundel: Formal vocabulary terms for security terms in data integrity, move to controller document.

Manu Sporny: Security vocabulary formally points to data integrity spec. Can update references to controller document. Would be the right thing to do. Can work with Ivan on that.

Brent Zundel: Calling it a day. Still a number of issues that are open.
… Core data model in a good place, now focusing on controller document.

---

[iherman]

This has been taken care of in w3c/vc-data-integrity#280. The current issue should have been closed at the merge of that issue; closing now.