Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is it o.k. to use the DID context in an example? #256

Closed
iherman opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Is it o.k. to use the DID context in an example? #256

iherman opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@iherman
Labels
editorial This issue or PR constitutes an editorial change.

Comments

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Mar 15, 2024

Example 8 uses the DID context URL for verification methods. While this is, technically, correct, it may come as a surprise for a reader of a Verifiable Credential Specification reader, who does not necessarily know about DID... The same thing happens elsewhere (like Example 7).

Maybe some general intro note should be added to the spec, making it clear that, though used in a VC setting, the vocabularies defined in the spec are also used by other specs like, for example, DID...
@iherman iherman added the editorial This issue or PR constitutes an editorial change. label Mar 15, 2024
@iherman iherman self-assigned this Mar 15, 2024
@iherman
Copy link
Member Author

iherman commented Mar 15, 2024

The example us

@iherman iherman closed this as completed Mar 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@iherman iherman

Labels
editorial This issue or PR constitutes an editorial change.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@iherman