Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update github link to use TR instead of github.io #852

Closed
OR13 opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Update github link to use TR instead of github.io #852

OR13 opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
@iherman

Comments

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor

OR13 commented Dec 16, 2021

Screen Shot 2021-12-16 at 11 02 34 AM
@csarven
Copy link
Member

csarven commented Dec 21, 2021 •
edited
Loading

As far as I can tell, https://w3c.github.io/vc-data-model/ is used as the ED. https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/ refers to it as the ED as well.

Please correct me if I'm wrong: as far I know, W3C doesn't include EDs under https://www.w3.org/TR/ - only W3C "published" documents as per Process.

Is there something in the works that will incorporate EDs under w3.org TR/ ?

@csarven
Copy link
Member

csarven commented Dec 21, 2021

On second read.. I suppose you meant to refer to REC as opposed to ED.

@kdenhartog kdenhartog self-assigned this Jan 11, 2022
@kdenhartog kdenhartog added editorial Purely editorial changes to the specification. v1.1 (editorial) errata Erratum for a W3C Recommendation and removed editorial Purely editorial changes to the specification. errata Erratum for a W3C Recommendation v1.1 (editorial) labels Jan 11, 2022
@kdenhartog
Copy link
Member

Removing the labels because I realized this has nothing to do with the spec and is about the link in this repo. Normally we've referenced the ED in that link, but I'm good with referencing the official REC version there instead. @iherman is the only one who can do that from what I know about the GH permissions at the moment.

@kdenhartog kdenhartog assigned iherman and unassigned kdenhartog Jan 11, 2022
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jan 12, 2022

Removing the labels because I realized this has nothing to do with the spec and is about the link in this repo. Normally we've referenced the ED in that link, but I'm good with referencing the official REC version there instead. @iherman is the only one who can do that from what I know about the GH permissions at the moment.

Thanks @kdenhartog; I must admit I did not understand the issue at first. I have changed the repo and it now points at the Rec:

Screen Shot 2022-01-12 at 11 41 51

@iherman iherman closed this as completed Jan 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@iherman iherman

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@csarven @iherman @OR13 @kdenhartog