Signature/proof formats are undocumented

[andrewwhitehead]

Unless I've missed it, neither this specification nor the BBS+ signatures spec defines the encoding for a BBS+ signature or for a PoK of a signature. The signature is fairly simple, although the compression and endianness need to be explicit. The proof encoding is rather more complicated.

[OR13]

@andrewwhitehead you are correct, and a recent bug in this highlights why its important, the correct place is not here though, its the DIF WG that manages the definition for BBS+.

[andrewwhitehead]

Yup, related issue: decentralized-identity/bbs-signature#2

[OR13]

This is still critical to fix, the document needs to be pointed to the latest IETF drafts.

[Wind4Greg]

Updated document contains full definitions of signature and proof formats along with test vectors.