Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[i18n] no need to refer considerations on data serialization defined in the core? #222

Closed
himorin opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #223
Closed

[i18n] no need to refer considerations on data serialization defined in the core? #222

himorin opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #223
Assignees
Labels
i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.

Comments

@himorin
Copy link

himorin commented Oct 27, 2023

https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-json-schema/#internationalization-considerations

In internationalization considerations section, first sentence notes

There are a number of internationalization considerations implementers should be aware of when publishing data described in this specification. As with any web standards or protocols implementation, ignoring internationalization makes it difficult for data to be produced and consumed across a disparate set of languages and societies, which would limit the applicability of the specification and significantly diminish its value as a standard.

which is actually a note for VC-DATA-MODEL but not schema, similar to third sentence

When using a verifiable credential to represent a schema, we recommend following the guidance in the VC Data Model.

Since this specification defines an integration of JSON Schema into VC-DATA-MODEL, removing first sentence and just keeping thried would be better.

@himorin himorin added the i18n-tracker Group bringing to attention of Internationalization, or tracked by i18n but not needing response. label Oct 27, 2023
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Oct 29, 2023

@himorin thanks.

Just an admin question: is this the only comment we have to take on board for this document? We are eager to go to CR, and we are waiting for your blessing...

cc @decentralgabe @msporny

@decentralgabe
Copy link
Collaborator

thanks opened #223

@himorin
Copy link
Author

himorin commented Oct 30, 2023

@iherman I believe so, for the only comment point

@aphillips aphillips added i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. and removed i18n-tracker Group bringing to attention of Internationalization, or tracked by i18n but not needing response. labels Nov 1, 2023
@aphillips
Copy link

Correcting the label but not re-opening

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants