You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2019. It is now read-only.
"Some tools do not declare that they only perform automatic testing. Since it is a known fact that automatic tests only cover a small set of accessibility issues, full accessibility conformance can only be ensured by supporting developers and accessibility experts while testing in manual and semiautomatic mode." At the other hand tools exists that are not doing full-automatic testing, but only giving feedback for manual evaluation (like inline suggestions). These tools give a lot of possible errors, but are not good in detecting failures. It would be great that a user knows how many tests are done automatically, and how many tests are 'selectors' for detecting possible errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reference
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tools/2014Aug/0004
Original Comment
"Some tools do not declare that they only perform automatic testing. Since it is a known fact that automatic tests only cover a small set of accessibility issues, full accessibility conformance can only be ensured by supporting developers and accessibility experts while testing in manual and semiautomatic mode." At the other hand tools exists that are not doing full-automatic testing, but only giving feedback for manual evaluation (like inline suggestions). These tools give a lot of possible errors, but are not good in detecting failures. It would be great that a user knows how many tests are done automatically, and how many tests are 'selectors' for detecting possible errors.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: