Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2019. It is now read-only.

2.1.1. Evaluation of media formats #67

Closed
ysmartin opened this issue Sep 17, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

2.1.1. Evaluation of media formats #67

ysmartin opened this issue Sep 17, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@ysmartin
Copy link
Contributor

Media contents often consist of multiple resources (e.g. multiple tracks, SMIL objects, etc.) This becomes specially relevant regarding accessibility alternatives which may reside in separate files (e.g. caption files). The current wording equates media resources with media files, it would need some clarification that media resources may have different resources associated (quite in line with markup resources having style and script resources associated).

@darthcav
Copy link

Resolution

Accepted.

@ysmartin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just a couple of editorial comments on the wording: 'caption' is often used, rather than 'subtitles', when referring to subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing. Plus, the new added sentence might make more sense later in the paragraph (when it says "from the accessibility standpoint, the evaluation of these resources" seems to refer to the caption tracks mentioned just before that).

@ysmartin ysmartin reopened this Sep 30, 2014
@darthcav
Copy link

darthcav commented Oct 8, 2014

Updated terminology to WCAG, including cross-links

@darthcav darthcav closed this as completed Oct 8, 2014
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants