Correct description of Rec patent commitments

[wseltzer]

Fixing text that attributed commitments to the Patent Policy, rather than to participants operating under it.

---

Preview | Diff

[frivoal]

@dwsinger Wendy is absolutely correct here. I suppose I should merge this in without a need for further discussion?

For the main branch it's easy, but for the version undergoing ballot, how do you want to handle that? @plh @jeffjaffe @swickr

[dwsinger]

On 20Aug, 2021, at 15:31 , Florian Rivoal ***@***.***> wrote: @dwsinger Wendy is absolutely correct here. I suppose I should merge this in without a need for further discussion?

yes

For the main branch it's easy,

yes

but for the version undergoing ballot, how do you want to handle that? @plh @jeffjaffe @swickr

once the ballot has closed. but didn’t we snapshot for ballot anyway?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS or Android.

David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple ***@***.***