editorial: rm undefined COO from informal Note #614
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
remove "COO" from a list in an informal Note. "COO" is not defined in the document either (in contrast, CEO is in the glossary), so this seems like it was a mistake that made it past review, and thus should be removed from a non-normative Note. if there's an actual use-case for adding "COO" to the Process, that should be raised as a separate issue for proper definition and consideration.
TallTed
reviewed
Aug 1, 2022
Comment on lines
+1958
to
1959
| Note: The Director and CEO have the role of | ||
| assessing consensus within the Advisory Committee. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As long as this is being massaged, have the role of assessing consensus should become either have the role of consensus assessor or perform the task of assessing consensus ... or something requiring a bit more bikeshedding.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no objection to further improving this Note, however this edit seems orthogonal to removal of "COO", so would prefer it be done in another PR, especially since it appears to request some discussion of options.
frivoal
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2022
plehegar
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2022
|
fyi @swickr |
frivoal
added
Closed: Accepted
|
The Revising W3C Process CG just discussed The full IRC log of that discussion<fantasai> Subtopic: remove mention of COO<fantasai> github: https://github.com//pull/614 <plh> fantasai: Tantek suggesting removing the COO from a Note <plh> florian: Ralph is the COO, but the Process doesn't define anything related to the COO. So, unnecessary. <plh> plh: +1 <cwilso> +1 <fantasai> plh: if CEO wants to delegate to COO can always do so <plh> Resolved: merge #614 |
frivoal
added
Commenter satisfied/accepting
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
remove "COO" from a list in an informal Note. "COO" is not defined in the document either (in contrast, CEO is in the glossary), so this seems like it was a mistake that made it past review, and thus should be removed from a non-normative Note. if there's an actual use-case for adding "COO" to the Process, that should be raised as a separate issue for proper definition and consideration.
Preview | Diff