AG WG Review: 3.3.7 Redundant Entry

[maryjom]

Summary

Review of proposed WCAG2ICT guidance for 3.3.7 Redundant Entry, as incorporated into the Editor's draft. This is new content.

Maturity Level

Refining

Action Needed

• Review content
• Use the thumbs up and thumbs down icons to indicate agreement or disagreement with various comments. Do not add comments to simply support other comments.
• Note any suggested edits for improvement and/or reasoning either in a comment on this issue or by creating a PR on the WCAG2ICT document. All SCs can be found in the comments-by-guideline-and-success-criteria.md file.

---

Content for Review

• Section Applying 3.3.7 Redundant Entry to Non-Web Documents and Software.

Reference Material

In case you need them, links to various resources on 3.3.7

• 3.3.7 Redundant Entry SC text in WCAG 2.2
• Intent section of Understanding 3.3.7 Redundant Entry

[mbgower]

This is a general comment about the whole document structure, not specific to this SC (though obviously relevant).

I'm inclined to think including the Intent section in the document slows down understanding and navigation. IMO, the link to the Intent section is sufficient.

[maryjom]

Closing this issue, as no substantive comments for SC 3.3.7 and only thumbs up reviews were received.