Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Annotation IRI mention in 4. #319

Closed
BigBlueHat opened this issue Jun 28, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Annotation IRI mention in 4. #319

BigBlueHat opened this issue Jun 28, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
@azaroth42
Labels
editorial protocol
Milestone
V1 PR

Comments

@BigBlueHat
Copy link
Member

From 4. Annotation Containers

The Annotations MUST be assigned IRIs with an additional path component below the Container's IRI.

Should/could this be moved into the 5.1 Create an Annotation section?

It seems out of place here (from an implementing perspective) and it's easily overlooked later--when focusing on 5.1.

Given that this is a protocol specific requirement (since that's not a requirement of id within items within AnnotationCollection), I think it fits best in 5.1.

Thoughts? @azaroth42
@azaroth42
Copy link
Collaborator

👍 Agree it's not in the right place.

@iherman iherman added this to the V1 PR milestone Jul 1, 2016
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jul 1, 2016

Covered by the PR #321. Closing this issue.

@iherman iherman closed this as completed Jul 1, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@azaroth42 azaroth42

Labels
editorial protocol
Projects
None yet
Milestone
V1 PR
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@BigBlueHat @iherman @azaroth42