typo in Protocol: rdf:label

[VladimirAlexiev]

http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/protocol/wd/#container-retrieval-requirements: "human readable label using the rdf:label predicate".
Should be rdfs:label.

[azaroth42]

Fixed in protocol (now just json label): http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/protocol/wd/#responses-without-annotations
Fixed equivalent in vocab: http://w3c.github.io/web-annotation/vocab/wd/#rdfs-label

[BigBlueHat]

@azaroth42 do you recall why label was chosen over name--which is what AS2 is using?

[BigBlueHat]

Ah....think I found it in their vocab document:

The name MAY be expressed using multiple language-tagged values.

...for which one can also substitute their unique nameMap thing...

[azaroth42]

rdfs:label is more widely used than as:name (obviously, as AS hasn't even gone into CR yet) so in terms of stability and likelihood that it will be understood, rdfs:label seems more appropriate.

Unless you mean the JSON-LD key for rdfs:label as label?

[BigBlueHat]

@azaroth42 I suppose I meant both...actually. 😄 The rdfs:label selection makes sense over as:name, but I'm curious ('cause I don't remember) if we discussed using schema:name instead.

As far as the JSON-LD level keys...label vs. name vs. title (from Atom or HTML for instance)...I'm not sure it matters terribly. Preference being to surface the friendliest version of whatever term is used underneath--so in this case label is perfect as rdfs:label is underneath.

[iherman]

Propose to leave this as label