Submission/microsoft/pointer events

[jacobrossi]

Contains an initial set of Pointer Event test case submissions from Microsoft and also a bug fix to an existing test case. Additional submissions will follow.

[hoppipolla-critic-bot]

Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/305

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

[mbrubeck]

Some typos here: s/Prese/Press/ and s/,or/, or/

[cathychan]

Some general comments.

1. It would be helpful to annotate the tests with test assertion numbers [TA] and/or annotate the test assertion page with test file names.
2. Many tests include an instruction to run the test again with a different pointer type, but the instructions are not consistent:
   * Refresh the page to run the tests again with a different pointer type.
   * Refresh the page to run the tests again with a different pointer type?
   * Would you like to <a href="#">run the tests again </a> with a different pointer type?
   They should all use the first variant. (Note that <a href="#"></a> would not enable the user to rerun the test.)

[TA] http://www.w3.org/wiki/PointerEvents/TestAssertions

[cathychan]

Also, can we have more consistent file names please? Now we have

• pointercancel.html
• pointerout.html
• pointerup.html

but

• pointerevent_pointerEnter.html
• pointerevent_pointerOver.html
• pointerevent_pointerLeave_xxx.html

etc.

[cathychan]

This is no longer in the spec and should be removed.

[cathychan]

A few more general comments.

1. All tests need a done(); statement at test completion. Otherwise, the page would show a "Harness timed out" even if the test is completed. (Currently, pointercancel.html is the only test that has this statement.)
2. Some of the #complete-notice styles are missing "background: #afa;".
3. Test file names should be consistent. Right now, we have pointercancel.html, pointerout.html and pointerup.html, but pointerevent_pointerEnter.html, pointerevent_pointerOver.html, etc.

[RByers]

fix indentation of this block

[sideshowbarker]

@ArtemAntonets, @jacobrossi what's this PR still waiting on before we can merge it?

[ArtemAntonets]

All comments processed except 3 that I've commented here. And also 1 from here: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/showcomment?chain=3710

Simon asks to add "_manual" to the pages that require manual interaction that will lead to renaming all the files except just 2 that are automatic. This will make review process to be very difficult. In case this change is reasonable, I would suggest to create according issue and make a separate PR with only name change.

[AFBarstow]

@ArtemAntonets - please note the file naming convention for manual tests is to use a dash ("-") and not an underscore ("_"). Thus, f.ex. "pointerleave-manual.html"