Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. #101

Closed
rlin1 opened this issue May 13, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

New research suggest using ED512 instead of ED256. #101

rlin1 opened this issue May 13, 2016 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
security-tracker Group bringing to attention of security, or tracked by the security Group but not needing response. type:technical

Comments

@rlin1
Copy link
Contributor

rlin1 commented May 13, 2016

We should replace ED256 by ED512 according to new research (http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1027 "Extended Tower Number Field Sieve: A New Complexity for the Medium Prime Case", by Taechan Kim and Razvan Barbulescu)

@rlin1
Copy link
Contributor Author

rlin1 commented May 13, 2016

see also #42

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH modified the milestones: CR, WD-01 Aug 31, 2016
@rlin1
Copy link
Contributor Author

rlin1 commented Sep 20, 2016

Propose a generic paragraph in the security considerations sections.

@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH added the security-tracker Group bringing to attention of security, or tracked by the security Group but not needing response. label Nov 30, 2016
@nadalin
Copy link
Contributor

nadalin commented Aug 23, 2017

@rlin1 can you research this to see if this can be closed

@nadalin
Copy link
Contributor

nadalin commented Sep 6, 2017

@selfissued, @rlin1 please close this

@selfissued
Copy link
Contributor

Closing, per the resolution to #42

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
security-tracker Group bringing to attention of security, or tracked by the security Group but not needing response. type:technical
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants