Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIDO credential decommissioning #1696

Closed
jdenghifive opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

FIDO credential decommissioning #1696

jdenghifive opened this issue Feb 9, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@jdenghifive
Copy link

FIDO credential decommissioning (with 3 cases) is specified in clause 1.3.5. However no API is defined yet for that end. Would like to raise the issue and request discussions here. The specified three uses cases ought to covered, and accomodate both credential types (client-side and server-side).

@nadalin
Copy link
Contributor

nadalin commented Feb 9, 2022

We have discussed this several times now and have chosen not to proceed down this path.

@MasterKale MasterKale changed the title FIDO dredential decommissioning FIDO credential decommissioning Feb 9, 2022
@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

equalsJeffH commented Feb 9, 2022

on 9-Feb-2022 call:
@agl notes that the "Report signaling" section of https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/wiki/Explainer:-broadening-the-user-base-of-WebAuthn#report-signaling speaks to the needs being expressed here (although presently there is no consensus regarding actually developing and incorporating such functionality in the spec).

on 23-Feb-2022 call: we are awaiting response from @jdenghifive.

@nadalin nadalin added this to the Futures (catch-all) milestone Mar 9, 2022
@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

on 9-Mar-2022 call:
Not having heard back from @jdenghifive, we've triaged this to the "futures" milestone for future consideration.
@agl noted that the "report signaling" section of the explainer (linked in the comment above) continues to be, in general, an interesting idea that the working group should consider when it has the cycles.

@timcappalli
Copy link
Member

closing to consolidate discussions on this topic. please continue discussions here: #1967

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants