Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should a FIDOAssertion on an Android platform use AndroidAttestationClientData? #32

Closed
equalsJeffH opened this issue Mar 13, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Should a FIDOAssertion on an Android platform use AndroidAttestationClientData? #32

equalsJeffH opened this issue Mar 13, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
stat:Discuss type:technical
Milestone
Last Working Draft

Comments

@equalsJeffH
Copy link
Contributor

Originally submitted by: levangongPayPal, on: Wednesday Dec 09, 2015 at 01:08 GMT

Section 3.4.3.3 indicates that the Android attestation statement uses an extended version of the clientData structure defined in the Signature spec (called AndroidAttestationClientData).

On Android platform, should a FIDOAssertion also use the same definition or stick to the structure defined in the Signature spec?
@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH added this to the ms-fido-v2.0-w3c milestone Mar 13, 2016
@equalsJeffH equalsJeffH removed this from the ms-fido-v2.0-w3c milestone Mar 13, 2016
@nadalin nadalin added this to the SPWD milestone Mar 30, 2016
@vijaybh
Copy link
Contributor

vijaybh commented May 6, 2016

Should be fixed in #76. Please open new issues if this is not sufficient.

@vijaybh vijaybh closed this as completed May 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
stat:Discuss type:technical
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Last Working Draft
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@equalsJeffH @nadalin @vijaybh