Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 27472 - RSAHashedKeyGenParams vs. Dictionary Fields Editorial Note #41

Closed
mwatson2 opened this issue May 23, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@mwatson2
Copy link
Collaborator

Bug 27472:

Just double-checking this editorial note I just removed from CR - I was under impression it was addressed by dictionary fields.


From Section 20.8:
Should this be folded into RsaHashedKeyGenParams and rely on the optional nature of the dictionary fields?

@mwatson2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also:

Another Editorial Note removed pre-CR. This seems like syntactic sugar and thus not a substantial change, but we don't want to forget about it. From 20.8

Editorial note

TODO: Specify the mapping between key.algorithm.hash and the appropriate Hash functions (and back to OID).

@mwatson2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It is not clear what the first note refers to, since 20.8 is now the operations section. Presumably it was previously a dictionary. I think we could assume this note is obsolete.

The TODO still seems to be relevant to define the mapping from hash values in the KeyAlgorithm and the hash functions to be used with RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5.

@mwatson2
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Propose to close as wontfix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant