Two browser or removal requirement

[ekr]

The highest priority of the group in this charter period will be to
get the core recommendations progressed towards Recommendation
status. To that end, features that are not demonstrated to be>
implemented by at least two browsers withih the timeframes indicated
will be removed from the specifications. Depending on their nature,
they may be republished as extension specification, or simply
dropped.

I have three concerns about this:

1. Procedurally, this doesn't actually have consensus in the WG. As far as I can tell, there was never any call for consensus on this point (or this proposed charter), If I'm wrong, please point me to it

2. It reflects a reversal of the basic understanding that we would make decisions on a consensus basis. I don't have a problem with the WG deciding to remove features, but that should be a WG decision, with holding the spec until there is consensus on how to proceed as an option.

3. This is particularly problematic in WebRTC, which is explicitly a collaboration with IETF, and thus decisions need to be made jointly.

[dontcallmedom]

(clean-up, this was solved as part of the discussions of the now approved webrtc charter)