We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The wt.closed and wt.ready promises are rejected on connection failure, which seems fine (similar to stream spec's reader.closed).
wt.closed
wt.ready
reader.closed
However, unlike reader.closed we don't set promise.[[PromiseIsHandled]].
As discovered in #539 (comment) this makes it hard for a JS library to polyfill a wt.state attribute without side-effects.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jan-ivar
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The
wt.closed
andwt.ready
promises are rejected on connection failure, which seems fine (similar to stream spec'sreader.closed
).However, unlike reader.closed we don't set promise.[[PromiseIsHandled]].
As discovered in #539 (comment) this makes it hard for a JS library to polyfill a wt.state attribute without side-effects.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: