Rename cov:block2SZX to cov:block2Size

[ektrah]

We should rename cov:block2SZX and cov:block1SZX to cov:block2Size and cov:block1SZX, respectively, as the SZX field actually contains the encoding of the size (0, 1, 2, ...) and not the size itself (16, 32, 64, ...).

[JKRhb]

Took the freedom of opening #259 as fix for this issue, and also already incorporated the changes into #246.

[ektrah]

You're fast! 😃

Thanks!

[ektrah]

Or maybe blockSize2 and blockSize1?

[JKRhb]

Or maybe blockSize2 and blockSize1?

I think I would tend to keep it as block2Size/block1Size (to make the Block2/Block1 association a bit more explicit), but I don't feel strongly about it. If you prefer blockSize2/blockSize1, we can also use that :)

[egekorkan]

Or maybe blockSize2 and blockSize1?

@ektrah we are going to merge #259 since you have approved it. If you prefer the other notation, we can reopen this issue