Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct nitpick in TD JSON Schema #1740

Closed
Silvanoc opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Correct nitpick in TD JSON Schema #1740

Silvanoc opened this issue Nov 8, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
Propose closing Problem will be closed shortly if there is no veto. validation Topic related to Normative Parsing, Validation, Consumption

Comments

@Silvanoc
Copy link

Silvanoc commented Nov 8, 2022

This comment marks the place of an erroneous comment in the TD JSON Schema.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-triage Automatically added to new issues. TF should triage them with proper labels label Nov 8, 2022
@egekorkan egekorkan added validation Topic related to Normative Parsing, Validation, Consumption and removed needs-triage Automatically added to new issues. TF should triage them with proper labels labels Nov 8, 2022
@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @Silvanoc for spotting this. I will fix it rightaway

@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor

I pressed the wrong shortcut and committed it directly to master branch at 0bbcc5c

If others are ok, we can keep it since it is a super simple change.

@egekorkan egekorkan added the Propose closing Problem will be closed shortly if there is no veto. label Nov 8, 2022
@sebastiankb
Copy link
Contributor

from today's TD call:

  • issue is solved and it was ok by the group that this small change was committed directly to the main
  • issue will be closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Propose closing Problem will be closed shortly if there is no veto. validation Topic related to Normative Parsing, Validation, Consumption
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants