Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Case for Smart City Dashboard #17

Closed
mmccool opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #38
Closed

Use Case for Smart City Dashboard #17

mmccool opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #38
Assignees

Comments

@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor

mmccool commented Apr 28, 2020

Note: this used to be called "Fleet Management" but based on the description I think "City Dashboard" is more appropriate. I tweaked the description slightly but the following is (mostly) what we agreed upon in the meeting with GTS:

Description:
Dashboard interface to control all actuators and view all sensors through the entire city in real time.
Actuators can include robots; for these, control means you can send commands to robots to move to new locations, drop off or pick up packages, etc. However, it could also include other kinds of actuators, such as flood gates, lights, etc. Sensors can include those for the environment and for people management (density counts, thermal cameras, etc). Dashboard would include mapping functionality, status of robots, other actuators, and sensors, data visualization, and historical comparisons. Mapping implies a need for location data for every actuator and sensor. This use case also includes camera and real-time data streaming.

@mmccool mmccool self-assigned this Apr 28, 2020
@ashimura ashimura transferred this issue from w3c/wot-architecture Jun 25, 2020
@mmccool
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmccool commented Jul 14, 2020

I have written a draft but it needs to be/is being reviewed by stakeholders before I can release it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants