New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal: replacing some material icons #3437
Comments
+1 for: reply, refresh & unarchive |
ping @notabene |
Hi, 1. back button I think the simple fact that you call the My preference would be the plain 2. Refetch I have no problem with the original recycle icon, so either way suits you. 3. Mark as unread Good idea, the |
Funny I was thinking about the back button icon today (before seeing this issue), and said to myself that the current icon was not very intuitive and could be replaced by a "Home" icon instead (since it brings you to wallabag's "home page"). Just an alternative suggestion 😉 |
@zertrin well, as long as the wallabag icon redirects to the home, I think we could use the |
Well I don't understand your comment:
Are you suggesting to change the article view page to address 1) and 2) ?? (for example by changing the behavior of 2) to really do the equivalent of history.back() and for 1), by adding a wallabag icon on the article page to bring back to the home?) Edit: in short: currently the "back" button is really a "home" button, hence my icon suggestion. If you change the behavior of the back button to be a real back button, my suggestion is moot indeed ^^ |
We currently have the following icons on the web app:
The back button can be counter-intuitive for left-to-right readers, so here's a possible change using icon
reply
, I also propose a change of the re-fetch icon torefresh
:Here are alternatives to the
reply
icon:keyboard_return
arrow_back
subdirectory_arrow_left
Moreover, I propose a change of "mark as unread" icon, from
redo
tounarchive
:Alternatively to left arrows, we could use
open_in_browser
which may be more neutral for both ltr and rtl readers:I show the
unarchive
icon here to see if we can use both icons without adding confusion.Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: