-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 756
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Footnotes lost in article #670
Comments
The class .footnotes isn't in the W3C specs, so I don't think that adding a |
True, but many sites use it this way and there are some plugins for web infrastructure that handle it that way e.g. Wordpress or jQuery Plugins. |
It's the wallabag core (e.g. the readability class) which should respect W3C specs. Specific rules for websites should be just the way they take the page the best, regardless of specs. |
Do we have something to do on this issue? |
will fix this, but only in 2 weeks. |
This issue affects wallabag v1. This version won't move anymore. |
Does this work in 2.0? I don't have a v2 instance for testing at the moment. |
I used wallabag with this article:
http://blog.tjll.net/ssh-kung-fu/
There are two footnotes below the article, which wallabag missed.
Luckily the HTML is
so at least for this site the fix should be easy. But i don't know how other blog software handles footnotes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: