Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to add own OpenAI API key #2788

Open
Matthew-gn opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 22 comments
Open

Option to add own OpenAI API key #2788

Matthew-gn opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 22 comments
Labels
Feature requests Feature Requests

Comments

@Matthew-gn
Copy link

Discord username (optional)

No response

Describe the solution you'd like?

To have the option to the new Warp AI to add our own API Key and maybe options to tweak the settings like the temperature?

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

No response

Additional context

No response

How important is this feature to you?

1 (Not too important)

Warp Internal (ignore) - linear-label:770f6576-d6c0-4e4f-a259-fc64b5156087

None

@Matthew-gn Matthew-gn added the Feature requests Feature Requests label Mar 17, 2023
@dannyneira
Copy link
Member

dannyneira commented Mar 17, 2023

Thanks for this feature request! AFAIK, we plan to keep the Warp AI in preview with 100 calls per day and set up a paid version in the future.

2024 Update: Warp now has a Team plan. https://www.warp.dev/blog/team-plan

Please 👍 and subscribe to this request as it helps us gauge interest. We will post any updates here.

@mf-ms
Copy link

mf-ms commented Mar 18, 2023

@dannyneira While I can somewhat understand it from a business perspective, I think adoption could be higher if you allow individual users to use their own API keys.
I'd be interested in this feature and even willing to pay to use it (within reason).
Thanks!

@numist
Copy link

numist commented Nov 29, 2023

I already pay OpenAI for API access, seems best for all involved if Warp doesn't have to pay any vendors for my AI usage (and my limit goes from 100 to whatever my credit card can handle).

@HerbWarren
Copy link

Same boat -- I work for a company that's given developers like me API keys to use, and for personal reasons I have my own anyway. If there's an option to bring your own key, that'd be super-hot.

@hekk-tatsukichi-yamashita

Considering its use in a business setting, it would be very helpful to have the flexibility to use customized Azure APIs.

@Ciel-MC
Copy link

Ciel-MC commented Feb 22, 2024

Seconding this, I really, really want to avoid subscriptions if possible, Id be happy to even have an alternative credit system(of course the best case is if it doesn't have to reach out to Warp's server at all and makes the OpenAI call entirely locally, but has a lot of implications), one major reason would be that I would rarely need to use it. I understand that some people using it less is one of the reasons that subscriptions are profitable(and why every company is flocking towards it), but, at least personally speaking, unless there's something else that Id pay for a subscription anyway, I would never pay for subscription just for integrating AI into the terminal, especially when I already have OpenAI credits. This might be a boomer take, but I just want to buy my stuff and have it, damnit.

Sorry if this is a ramble, but I do like the idea of Warp a lot, but if Im going to use a proprietary terminal, it just has to be so, so, much better to be justified, and having to have a subscription for this is a dealbreaker.

@ThinkFar
Copy link

ThinkFar commented Mar 5, 2024

Please do this.

@Flecart
Copy link

Flecart commented Mar 5, 2024

Is this coming?

@eighteyes
Copy link

Ping, especially if you start to offer other models, the ability to use our own keys would be nice, for you especially since you're footing the AI bill.

@YourTechBud
Copy link

Maybe if we have support to override some additional parameters like the base url? That would be dope.
We run our own open source models on a on-prem workstation. The server is openai compatible. Just need a way to change the base url option.

@nyteshade
Copy link

Companies that want to force using their AI intergration with a pay wall are missing out on the opportunity for a low cost subscription where users can bring their own LLM keys to the party.

For example you can either get 0 from me for this or 4.99 a month paid upfront once a year if I can provide my own keys that I also already pay for

@Patcybermind
Copy link

yeah i dont think a lot of people are gonna be paying for a warp subscription since its nothing a little google search and something like perplexity ai or You cant do

@Flecart
Copy link

Flecart commented May 8, 2024

Is this coming?

@Patcybermind
Copy link

Is it planned someday?

@Flecart
Copy link

Flecart commented May 12, 2024

Is it planned someday?

Hope they listen to us...

@Lr-2002
Copy link

Lr-2002 commented May 16, 2024

Yep, this will limited your company's income which is really terriable, But could we just share a mode with cheaper subscription which could give an interface to accept the personal api token ? I would pay for it for the most modern terminal i've used .
It's really awesome to use warp terminial and it helps me a lot .Hoping for your reply

@DanEdens
Copy link

DanEdens commented May 16, 2024

This new model totally ruins the magic for me. I'd have happily paid 5, and begrudged 10, but 22 is absurd. I can just use the chatgpt-cli and pipes for the same result..

There really needs to be a personal tier. Even calling it a team when I only intend for myself, feels like getting a veggie option and still having to pay for the meat

@monkeyden
Copy link

There is zero chance I am paying you to relay my prompts to OpenAI when I already subscribe to OpenAI. 😆

@Patcybermind
Copy link

yall do know that github copilot cli exists and its free for a lot of people

@Patcybermind
Copy link

we arent gonna pay 22 a month for some extra gimmicks

@ShivamB25
Copy link

even a one time fees or yearly would have been fine with Bringing our own keys. Warp isn't so so truly open source.

@Patcybermind
Copy link

Its as open source as google chrome

@dannyneira dannyneira mentioned this issue Jun 3, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature requests Feature Requests
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests