Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Wasm proposal: tail-call #363

Closed
Robbepop opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #683
Closed

Implement Wasm proposal: tail-call #363

Robbepop opened this issue Feb 15, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #683
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-low Low priority work item.

Comments

@Robbepop
Copy link
Member

Robbepop commented Feb 15, 2022

This is about adding support for the tail-call Wasm proposal.

The tail-call Wasm proposal has recently been moved to Phase 4 with respect to the Wasm standardization and is fairly light weight, therefore implementing it won't be a lot of work and we can expect it to be stabilized very soon. Furthermore having tail-call support in wasmi will be an enabler for self-hosting wasmi once (or if) we actually make use of tail-call based instruction dispatch.

Generally we should keep up with supporting finished Wasm proposals as this allows us to keep the Wasm spec test suite up to date.

@Robbepop Robbepop added enhancement New feature or request wasmi-v1 labels Feb 15, 2022
@Robbepop Robbepop added the priority-low Low priority work item. label Oct 3, 2022
@Robbepop Robbepop removed the wasmi-v1 label Oct 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-low Low priority work item.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant