New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rvm 1.10.3 with multi-user installation failed GUI on Fedora 16 #835
Comments
could you do a test and after installation in multiuser mode move this should just work as rvm was removed from start. next open terminal and run
and gist the outputs of both |
@mpapis Before I saw your reply, I tried on another machine and the same thing happened. Then I move rvm.sh, reboot and everything back to normal. bash -l sh -l |
could you gist your /etc/profile ? (edit: from the box that gets broken) |
It should help: #836 |
Thanks for the quick fix. |
This bug also created some agony over the last few months: See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805254 |
I think the biggest issue is that Fedoras GDM sources /etc/profile - according to |
My system is Fedora 16 running on VMWare workstation in Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit. I have tried it many times. Once I install rvm 1.10.3 with multi-user installations, the next time I reboot the server, the booting process hangs with error below:
failed to start Display Manager
See 'systemctl status prefdm.service' for details
The message from systemctl status prefdm.service:
prefdm.service - Display Manager
Load: (/lib/systemd/system/prefdm.service:static)
Active: failed since Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:47:46 -0500: 1min 52s ago
Process:1242 ExecStart=/etc/X11/prefdm.service -nodaemon (code=exited, status=2)
CGroup: name=systemd:/system/prefdm.service
At this point, I could still ssh into the server and everything else seems fine. I just couldn't start X. After removing rvm, everything went back to normal.
Then I tried 1.10.3 with single-user installation and it's ok. I also tried 1.10.2 with multi-user installation and it doesn't have the same issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: