Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Worth considering though. View full project report here.
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #64 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 56.34% 56.36% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 170 170
Lines 10062 10057 -5
==========================================
Hits 5669 5669
+ Misses 4393 4388 -5
|
Sourcery Code Quality Report✅ Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.33%.
Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:
Legend and ExplanationThe emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:
The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request. Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated. We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come! Help us improve this quality report! |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
Branch
main
refactored by Sourcery.If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.
See our documentation here.
Run Sourcery locally
Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:
Review changes via command line
To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the
main
branch, then run:Help us improve this pull request!