Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Demo of UCAN based auth #542

Closed
atopal opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Demo of UCAN based auth #542

atopal opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up

Comments

@atopal
Copy link
Contributor

atopal commented Oct 18, 2021

Fission team developed UCAN: System for authorizing users without a back end. We would like to do a field study by creating a demo showcasing how UCANs could enable improve our current auth system.

@atopal atopal added kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels Oct 18, 2021
@atopal atopal added P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up and removed need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels Oct 18, 2021
@Gozala
Copy link
Contributor

Gozala commented Oct 18, 2021

@olizilla I think you’ve mentioned some requirements you wanted this to meet, could you please post them here I am not sure I got them in the call.

@Gozala
Copy link
Contributor

Gozala commented Oct 18, 2021

Are we talking about actual "login with fission" style button or are we talking about fission auth system UCAN I was assuming it was later, but reading the issue got me thinking we may mean former.

@olizilla
Copy link
Contributor

I think their current offering is based on UCANs, but also depends on their infra. They have a proposal for an sdk that would allow apps to implement UCANs without needing to depend on their infra, but as I understand it that doesn't exist yet. The issue here is that we need someone on the team to dig in to the details of what fission offers today, and then help us make a call on if we want to adopt their proposal. This is an "explore and report back" issue. Could you take a pass at refining the scope of this issue please as you learn more.

@Gozala Gozala changed the title POC for using Fission auth POC of Fission auth Nov 9, 2021
@Gozala Gozala changed the title POC of Fission auth Demo of UCAN tokens Nov 9, 2021
@Gozala Gozala changed the title Demo of UCAN tokens Demo of UCAN based authorization Nov 9, 2021
@Gozala Gozala changed the title Demo of UCAN based authorization Demo of UCAN based auth Nov 9, 2021
@Gozala
Copy link
Contributor

Gozala commented Nov 9, 2021

I think their current offering is based on UCANs, but also depends on their infra. They have a proposal for an sdk that would allow apps to implement UCANs without needing to depend on their infra, but as I understand it that doesn't exist yet.

This is incorrect, there is no dependence on their infrastructure.

The issue here is that we need someone on the team to dig in to the details of what fission offers today, and then help us make a call on if we want to adopt their proposal. This is an "explore and report back" issue. Could you take a pass at refining the scope of this issue please as you learn more.

Sure I'll post updates and change issue description

@Gozala Gozala closed this as completed Nov 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants