Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 28, 2024. It is now read-only.

Pre-processed data #1

Closed
macaodha opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 9 comments
Closed

Pre-processed data #1

macaodha opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 9 comments
Labels
Useful issue useful issue

Comments

@macaodha
Copy link

Hi there,

Your code looks great. I was just wondering what is the main difference between your pre-processed dataset and h36m.zip from the original tensorflow repo.

Thanks

@weigq
Copy link
Owner

weigq commented Mar 22, 2018

actually, it is same as the original repo. It is the normalized data.

best.

@macaodha
Copy link
Author

So it's the same as running their data loading and then preprocessing code (e.g. including projection, keypoint exclusion, etc)?

Thanks

@weigq
Copy link
Owner

weigq commented Mar 22, 2018

yes

@macaodha
Copy link
Author

Thanks for all your help. When I load the data with your code it is the following size:
Train size 1559752
Test size 548819

From the original tensorflow the train is the same but the test is bigger:
Test size 550644

Any ideas why it might be different.

@weigq
Copy link
Owner

weigq commented Mar 24, 2018

sorry, I have fixed this and updated the data.

The videos provided by the Human3.6M contain a damaged video, so the test set is less if using stacked hourglass to predict 2d pose, and I mistakenly missed this one when processing groundtruth data.

I will upload the data processing code.
Thanks!

@macaodha
Copy link
Author

Thanks

@salihkaragoz
Copy link

salihkaragoz commented Jul 16, 2018

@weigq, @macaodha Btw, as a supplementary information;

This action has no video in the Human3.6M dataset,
Subject 11 Action Directions Camera 54138969 (no video)

These below actions has smaller annotations than expected in the global coordinate, not image plane
Subject 9 Action Greeting
Subject 9 Action SittingDown_1
Subject 9 Action Waiting_1
Subject 9 Action Walking

Good Work!

@weigq
Copy link
Owner

weigq commented Jul 16, 2018

@salihkaragoz
Great!
Thanks for your supplements.

@weigq
Copy link
Owner

weigq commented Jul 16, 2018

I will closed this issue, you can reopen it if needed.

@weigq weigq closed this as completed Jul 16, 2018
@weigq weigq added bug Something isn't working Useful issue useful issue and removed bug Something isn't working labels Jul 16, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Useful issue useful issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants