You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Greetings! May I ask a question about utide.reconstruct? I have a 1-d data of sea level and I am trying to obtain the astronomical tide by using uTide. My code more or less looks like this.
I am getting a time series, of the tide, that looks like it has much smaller frequency than the astromical tide obtained with Foreman. I see that, in my case, I get a frequency in radians/hour from utide.solve, but utide.reconstruct is using this frequency in cycle per hour (as I can see from the comments in the source code). Hence the smaller frequency. I must have dropped some option somewhere.
Thanks in advance,
Jue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Please supply a very minimal, but still complete, example that illustrates the question. Also, look at tests/test_solve.py, which illustrates a round-trip in which the results of solve are used in reconstruct.
Thank you so much for the prompt reply. I have been running test_solve.py and looking into my code and data. I think that the technical problem is mine, and it does not seem to do with utide, for now. I have some issues with SA and SSA, but I will ask again if I am sure that there is something that I could contribute to utide.
Greetings! May I ask a question about utide.reconstruct? I have a 1-d data of sea level and I am trying to obtain the astronomical tide by using uTide. My code more or less looks like this.
I am getting a time series, of the tide, that looks like it has much smaller frequency than the astromical tide obtained with Foreman. I see that, in my case, I get a frequency in radians/hour from utide.solve, but utide.reconstruct is using this frequency in cycle per hour (as I can see from the comments in the source code). Hence the smaller frequency. I must have dropped some option somewhere.
Thanks in advance,
Jue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: