Bugzilla issues elsewhere

[annevk]

• https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=WebSocket%20API%20%28editor%3A%20Ian%20Hickson%29&list_id=59619&product=WebAppsWG&resolution=---
• https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Server-Sent%20Events%20%28editor%3A%20Ian%20Hickson%29&list_id=59615&product=WebAppsWG&resolution=---

The other "editor: Ian Hickson" are mostly empty (one contains an editorial issue that doesn't apply to non-forks) and even these are not too important.

I wonder if @AFBarstow has any ideas, since those components are clearly not maintained by Ian anymore.

[domenic]

I went through the first bullet point and found only two issues that were not related to editorial mishaps due to forking:

• https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27915, which seems like a WORKSFORME
• https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28841, which I did Update WebSocket construction per mixed content #222 to solve.

So checking that off as taken care of.

[domenic]

The second link only contains one open bug, where @annevk is recently involved. @annevk, maybe you could summarize its action item into a new GitHub issue, mark it as moved, and then we can close this meta-issue?

[annevk]

I created #226, but the main point behind this issue was if we could figure out a way to reduce the amount of channels for giving feedback. E.g., perhaps by closing those components.

@sideshowbarker @AFBarstow?

[AFBarstow]

The BugZ status of the 5 (so-called) "HTML(5) APIs" is: SSE (0), Messaging (0), Storage (0), Workers (1) and Sockets (4).

We (@sideshowbarker or some other staff) can and should now mark the first three above as "HISTORICAL" and disable write access. Is this what you want @annevk?

I would be reluctant to do the same to Workers and Sockets until they have ZarroBoogs (f.ex. the open bugs are copied to Github and then closed).

[annevk]

@AFBarstow yeah closing them would be great. It seems the remaining bugs are all nits about the issues with the fork being standalone, so those are not really actionable to the WHATWG.

[annevk]

I guess I'll close this then.