Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider new contenteditable attribute values #5184

Open
johanneswilm opened this issue Dec 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Consider new contenteditable attribute values #5184

johanneswilm opened this issue Dec 28, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
addition/proposal New features or enhancements needs concrete proposal Moving the issue forward requires someone to figure out a detailed plan needs implementer interest Moving the issue forward requires implementers to express interest topic: editing

Comments

@johanneswilm
Copy link

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/commit-snapshots/5b42943aa88e5c79c8afd75c904eb99d1b061066/#contenteditable

The contenteditable content attribute is an enumerated attribute whose keywords are the empty string, true, and false.

Be aware that we are working on additional values for the "contenteditable" attribute in contenteditable: "events", "caret", "typing", "plaintext-only". See the discussion on this here.
@domenic domenic added addition/proposal New features or enhancements needs concrete proposal Moving the issue forward requires someone to figure out a detailed plan needs implementer interest Moving the issue forward requires implementers to express interest topic: editing labels Dec 28, 2019
@annevk annevk changed the title "The contenteditable content attribute is an enu..." Consider new contenteditable attribute values Jan 3, 2020
@zcorpan zcorpan mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
addition/proposal New features or enhancements needs concrete proposal Moving the issue forward requires someone to figure out a detailed plan needs implementer interest Moving the issue forward requires implementers to express interest topic: editing
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@johanneswilm @domenic