You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The URL code points are ASCII alphanumeric, "!", "$", "&", "'", "(", ")", "*", "+", ",", "-", ".", "/", ":", ";", "=", "?", "@", "_", "~", and code points in the ranges U+00A0 to U+D7FF, U+E000 to U+FDCF, U+FDF0 to U+FFFD, U+10000 to U+1FFFD, U+20000 to U+2FFFD, U+30000 to U+3FFFD, U+40000 to U+4FFFD, U+50000 to U+5FFFD, U+60000 to U+6FFFD, U+70000 to U+7FFFD, U+80000 to U+8FFFD, U+90000 to U+9FFFD, U+A0000 to U+AFFFD, U+B0000 to U+BFFFD, U+C0000 to U+CFFFD, U+D0000 to U+DFFFD, U+E0000 to U+EFFFD, U+F0000 to U+FFFFD, U+100000 to U+10FFFD.
I think that standard should explicitly say if ranges above are inclusive or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the simplest way to address this would be to replace the final dot with ", all inclusive.". What do you think? Would you be willing to make that change?
https://url.spec.whatwg.org/commit-snapshots/4bf85a08da18ef367e093426abef776d59e8fb7b/#url-writing
I think that standard should explicitly say if ranges above are inclusive or not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: