Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

URL code points ranges are inclusive or not #262

Closed
burlog opened this issue Mar 3, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

URL code points ranges are inclusive or not #262

burlog opened this issue Mar 3, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@burlog
Copy link
Contributor

burlog commented Mar 3, 2017

https://url.spec.whatwg.org/commit-snapshots/4bf85a08da18ef367e093426abef776d59e8fb7b/#url-writing

The URL code points are ASCII alphanumeric, "!", "$", "&", "'", "(", ")", "*", "+", ",", "-", ".", "/", ":​", ";", "=​", "?", "@​", "_", "~", and code points in the ranges U+00A0 to U+D7FF, U+E000 to U+FDCF, U+FDF0 to U+FFFD, U+10000 to U+1FFFD, U+20000 to U+2FFFD, U+30000 to U+3FFFD, U+40000 to U+4FFFD, U+50000 to U+5FFFD, U+60000 to U+6FFFD, U+70000 to U+7FFFD, U+80000 to U+8FFFD, U+90000 to U+9FFFD, U+A0000 to U+AFFFD, U+B0000 to U+BFFFD, U+C0000 to U+CFFFD, U+D0000 to U+DFFFD, U+E0000 to U+EFFFD, U+F0000 to U+FFFFD, U+100000 to U+10FFFD.

I think that standard should explicitly say if ranges above are inclusive or not.

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 6, 2017

I think the simplest way to address this would be to replace the final dot with ", all inclusive.". What do you think? Would you be willing to make that change?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants