You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With the current implementation, all the transitions must be stated explicitly and with the alphabet as arc labels.
Describe the solution you'd like
A way to specify a broader set of possible transitions expressed by propositional formulas, e.g. true to specify any symbol (even not present in the alphabet), false the opposite, a to indicate that the proposition a must be true.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
With the current implementation, all the transitions must be stated explicitly and with the alphabet as arc labels.
Describe the solution you'd like
A way to specify a broader set of possible transitions expressed by propositional formulas, e.g.
true
to specify any symbol (even not present in the alphabet),false
the opposite,a
to indicate that the propositiona
must be true.Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: