New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update SF Neighbourhood Records #316
Comments
Note: Consider adding a |
(See: this comment for most recent files)
|
I'm fine with creating a new macrohood record for the Mission, let's make sure it's min_zoom shows up early. |
(See: this comment for most recent files) New This new Continuing the list above: 5. New macrohood A .geojson file (without an ID field) was created for new a macrohood record that has not been assigned a current WOF ID. This .geojson will be imported and the following will need to occur:
|
(See: this comment for most recent files) Added in a sixth geojson file to the S3 Dropbox. The file contains four new microhood records with a |
New files are now in the S3 All files will have the following attributes: wof:id Notes about specific files in the S3 misc folder: SF_Bad_Neighbourhood_Points.geojson
SF_Bad_Neighbourhood_Polygons.geojson
SF_Macrohoods.geojson
SF_Microhoods.geojson
SF_New_Neighbourhoods.geojson
SF_Updated_Neighbourhoods.geojson
The |
Per #187: GeoJSON files in this issue need to be updated to include neighbourhood and microhood work in SOMA. The following microhoods should fall within the "South of Market" neighbourhood record:
Links: |
Reassigning myself for updates to SF records. |
Note to self: Import the new clipped locality shape as a new alt_geometry. Do not include it in the S3 files. |
Please toss the new shapes into S3. |
SF neighbourhood files are in the S3 |
Neighbourhood (and associated) features have been updated in SF, closing issue. |
(See: this comment for most recent files)
Starting where #125 left off.
The current neighbourhood records in San Francisco need to be updated to reflect neighbourhood boundaries provided by the City of San Francisco. This, in turn, will require udates at the
macrohood
,neighbourhood
, andmicrohood
levels.To do for each
wof:placetype
:1. Macrohoods
A .geojson file with three macrohoods (
Sunset
,Richmond
, andDowntown
) was created with IDs (the IDs correspond to currentneighbourhood
records that should be promoted tomacrohood
records). This .geojson will be imported and the following will need to occur:2. Updated Neighbourhoods
A .geojson file (with an ID field) was created for
neighbourhood
records that have new geometries. This .geojson will be imported and the following will need to occur:3. New Neighbourhoods
A .geojson file (without an ID field) was created for new
neighbourhood
records that have not been assigned a current WOF ID. This .geojson will be imported and the following will need to occur:4. Microhoods
A .geojson file (with an ID field) was created for current
neighbourhood
records that will be "demoted" tomicrohoods
. The .geojson will be imported and the following will need to occur:supersedes
andsupersedes_by
updatesThese four .geojson files will be placed in the S3 WOF/misc bucket.
Additional one-offs (deprecating two records and updating parenting of two records that fall outside of San Francisco (Westlake and Fort Winfield Scott)) will occur in separate PR(s).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: