Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default capabilities of cross domain iframe #22

Closed
kayakrafter-001 opened this issue Mar 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Default capabilities of cross domain iframe #22

kayakrafter-001 opened this issue Mar 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@kayakrafter-001
Copy link

kayakrafter-001 commented Mar 29, 2020

By default, cross-domain iframes should be able to call the TURTLEDOVE APIs. Today, groups of publishers often deploy iframes managed by a single owner to create large scale interest groups using third-party cookies. Updating these iframes can be a challenge for publishers. If the iframes are able to call the TURTLEDOVE APIs by default, the iframe owners can migrate to TURTLEDOVE, while the interest group creation will continue to work for the publishers, without the publisher having to make any changes.

@michaelkleber
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree that it should be possible to have cross-domain iframes both with and without the ability to add people to interest groups. But it seems to me that there are two reasons we might want the default to be off:

  1. Lots of sites have lots of iframes for lots of reasons today, and as you say, "Updating these iframes can be a challenge for publishers." It seems likely that publishers would want to exercise judgement about what 3rd parties can add the site's visitors to an interest group. Giving that ability to anyone who got an iframe for any reason in the past doesn't seem like the site owner making a judgement call.

  2. Transitive inclusion. When iframes include other iframes, it's easy for a site to end up including a third party that the original site owner doesn't know about. But it seems unlikely to me that sites would want to give this capability away globally.

You're quite right that these need to be balanced against the work we're requiring of sites that do want to give this capability to a 3rd party. But it sounds like you're thinking about publishers who get some financial benefit from including these iframes. That's the right sort of motivation for sites to make this change when they intend to do so!

@JensenPaul
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this issue as it represents past design discussion that predates more recent proposals. I believe some of this feedback was incorporated into the Protected Audience (formerly known as FLEDGE) delegation mechanism. If you feel further discussion is needed, please feel free to reopen this issue or file a new issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants