-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Item] Embed item notes by note-tag #198
Comments
I'm a little bit too busy... Please wait for several more days. |
@windingwind absolutely, no reasonable expectation of speedy (or, any) turnaround for a request for help :-). I will also try to look at it again |
I think this does what I wanted. It collects item notes and annotations (I think; all my annotations are already in notes) by tag. As you noticed before, to work, it does need to be run on top-level items so it won't work on the 'search' output where it lets you select the directly tagged notes. I may now try to create two other versions (1) that outputs filtered data (so, if nothing is tagged, exclude the item); or/and (2) a mod of the 'collect annotations by tag separately' so I can collect all annotation and note content for a set of items by tag.
|
Glad to know it works! Sorry for the late reply. |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Template Type
Item
Desired Template Performance
As in #177 (comment) I am hoping to create a template where:
This could be similar to inserting the
item-notes with metadata
template into the[Item] collect annotations and notes by tag
loop. My confusion with the[Item] collect annotations and notes by tag
is that the screenshots seem to suggest that quoted text and images would be embedded, but actually I got the links.Current Template
The
[Item] collect annotations and notes by tag
anditem-notes with metadata
get me part way. I'm not familiar with JS so there's a syntax error in this, but I think the broad structure should be rightThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: