Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2022. It is now read-only.

Update req-all to version 1.0.0 πŸš€ #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2017

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

req-all just published its new version 1.0.0.

State Update πŸš€
Dependency req-all
New version 1.0.0
Type dependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of req-all.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


The new version differs by 2 commits .

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚑ greenkeeper upgrade

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 13, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling c3cffce on greenkeeper-req-all-1.0.0 into e9051fa on master.

@Kikobeats Kikobeats merged commit 758e15c into master Jan 13, 2017
@Kikobeats Kikobeats deleted the greenkeeper-req-all-1.0.0 branch January 13, 2017 10:29
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants