-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One graph per CPU wrong #1967
Comments
Few things worth checking here:
It could be a discrepancy in the cycle-based CPU usage and efficiency cores. I'm not sure, I don't have access to that type of hardware to test myself. If it is, it's possible task manager if over-reporting the actual utilization of efficiency cores. This would become evident with 1 above. Hovering over one of the graphs in SI should report the core type. It's also possible the kernel's accounting of intel efficiency cores changed in the most recent versions of Windows. The observation here seems similar to the ARM cycle accounting. |
I first ran a test with TM, SI, PE and RM (see screenshot). They're all over the place.
Then I disabled SI reports the first 16 logical processors as P-Core, and the last 16 as E-Core. I will say that on the TM Details tab, if you sort by CPU, the total (excluding System Idle Process) does not add up to the total reported on the Performance tab (e.g., Performance tab reports 8%, but Details tab reports 3-5%). That being said, the Processes tab total for CPU does match the Performance tab. ha! Which one is right? And why? Should I leave I'm sure there's a good explanation for all of this, and my curious mind would very much like to know! :) I appreciate the help @jxy-s |
Task Manager uses "Processor Utility" for reporting this information: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/performance/cpu-usage-exceeds-100
This blog post will help add some color to the subject. It's focused on ARM but will help explain the option in detail. My advisement is to keep
If PE and SI are both reporting the same information (with cycle-based CPU usage off) it leads me to believe there is a problem with Task Manager. We regularly observe Task Manager reporting +/- 30% of what is should be (this is due to the "Processor Utility" linked above). I only have access to a Windows 10 machine with Intel performance and efficiency cores. It's an older Intel CPU than your 14900K, but checking that machine shows consistent information for me. I checked the To help diagnose this type of problem I often use CpuStres to stress targeted processors. It might be useful to run this experiment on your machine and see if the accounting is what you would expect. Using CpuStress you can set the ideal CPU and affinity to isolate the thread to a processor and apply a load to it. Once a load is applied you can check the reporting in the various tools to look for egregious inconsistencies. |
https://aaron-margosis.medium.com/task-managers-cpu-numbers-are-all-but-meaningless-2d165b421e43
Task Managers details tab is the only remaining place where TM reports utilization. |
Good lord... My head hurts after reading that. 😁 Thanks for the link. That helps to make more sense of it. You guys are the experts (as far as I'm concerned). Given my CPU and OS, what tool/configuration/metric(s) should I use as the most accurate representation of how hard my system is working? I'm guessing you'll say System Informer, which is good, but how should I configure the options? And how should I interpret the results (e.g., on what scale)? |
Brief description of your issue
Intel Core i9 14900K running multiple threads at relatively high load, which is reflected well in Windows Task Manager, but not in System Informer. I'm using the nightly build version 3.0.7429 on Windows 11 Pro 23H2 OS Build 22631.3007.
The total CPU utilization shows as 70% in TM but only 41.14% in SI. The obvious difference is by logical processor (32). Just eyeballing it, TM looks close to 70%, but SI's 32 graphs are nowhere near 41%. I tried resizing the window, closing and reopening the window, closing and reopening SI, but was met with the same result.
So it's three things:
Steps to reproduce (optional)
Open System Informer and Task Manager at the same time (side by side) and set their CPU graphs to show logical processors. Run tasks that consume a lot of multithreaded CPU.
Expected behavior (optional)
Actual behavior (optional)
No response
Environment (optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: