-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jetty 10 support #1967
Comments
I feel like this probably won't be worth the amount of noise and support headaches this will cause, especially since Jetty 10 is also JVM 11+. |
What would be more interesting is a build that uses the in-built Java HTTP client and server rather than Jetty + Apache. |
That is right, there are some implications, do you mind if I keep this issue open for some time to see if there is an interest from community to support Jetty 10?
thanks @tomakehurst, this is interesting idea, afaik client is certainly fine but server lacks tons of features (fe. HTTP/2 support, ... [1]), so it may not be an equivalent replacement. |
Agreed it wouldn't support everything that Jetty can, but a large proportion of WireMock's use is plain HTTP/1.1, without faults, HTTP/2 or any of the more advanced features. Being able to support the majority cases with a dependency-light version could still be very useful. |
@tomakehurst AFAICT it is in the scope for WireMock 3.0, because Jetty 11 support is already in the codebase. Please correct me if I am wrong |
FTR #1760 |
Yep, this is now obsolete. |
Hi there. Just wanted to comment for visibility. But now we can use neither wiremock 2 nor 3 as the jetty versions don't match and the dependencies pulled don't align. |
@natan-abolafya the workaround that works for us is to use |
The Jetty 10 is the next (last?)
javax.*
compatible release branch: JDK 11 base line, new APIs. It woud be great to havewiremock
to support Jetty 10, along with Jetty 9 (and Jetty 11 [1]).@tomakehurst wdyt? Once we done with Jetty 11 [1], we could also work on supporting Jetty 10, preferably alongside with Jetty 9, so
wiremock
could be used in wider range of applications (should be easier at least with respect tofileupload
).[1] #1760
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: