Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defining a generic parameter type '@' #43

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Defining a generic parameter type '@' #43

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Defining a generic parameter type '@' in arch rules does not work in Papyrus. 
Need to define a standard and translate it. Use <undefined>?

Set Standard: Letting the parameter have <undefined> type equals defining type 
'@' in Rhapsody.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ellinor....@gmail.com on 31 May 2012 at 1:57

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by ellinor....@gmail.com on 1 Jun 2012 at 8:48

  • Added labels: V2-ArConExtension
  • Removed labels: V2ArConExtension

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Using <undefined> as 'non-constrained'.

Original comment by fridell....@gmail.com on 25 Jun 2012 at 6:38

  • Changed state: Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant