New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
constants, mapper: type bugfixes #11
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
woodruffw
added
C:mapper
Concerns the llvm-mapper crate.
C:support
Concerns the llvm-support crate.
labels
Sep 13, 2021
This is going to be a little annoying with the current implementation, since we fully "unroll" each type as we encounter it. As a result, forward references are prematurely unrolled and we don't have a chance to fix them up. |
Braindumping so that I have a better starting point for this later. There are a few annoying aspects of LLVM's type table layout:
|
Yet another ordered iterator bug.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
My type table state machine thingy is a little bit wrong, since it doesn't correctly handle forward-referenced types (e.g. if a pointer type has
struct foo
as its pointee).Needs fixing.