/
19100927_reps_4_57.xml
6614 lines (6614 loc) · 398 KB
/
19100927_reps_4_57.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1910-09-27</date>
<parliament.no>4</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>0</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>3742</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para>House ofRepresentatives. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1910-09-27</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr.</inline>Speaker took the chair at 3 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3742</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PARLIAMENTARY REFRESHMENT BAR</title>
<page.no>3742</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3742</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K99</name.id>
<electorate>LANG, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>FT; ANTI-SOC from 1906; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSON, Elliot</name>
<name role="display">Mr W ELLIOT JOHNSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the fact that the adjourned debate on the question of the prohibition of the sale of intoxicants within the precincts of the House was, upon the. motion of the Prime Minister, made an Order of. the Day for to-day's sitting, will the honorable gentleman postpone the eleven interveningitems of Government business upon the notice-paper so that the House may come to a. vote on the question without delay? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3742</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate>WIDE BAY, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Prime Minister</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have stated again and again that an opportunity will be affordedto honorable members opposite to take a vote on the question, I hope, soon, but important Government business must take precedence. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3742</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>HONORABLE J. BLAIR</title>
<page.no>3742</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3742</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEX</name.id>
<electorate>BRISBANE, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FINLAYSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr FINLAYSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is it true, as stated in a Brisbane newspaper, that the Honorable J. Blair has been offered the position of constitutional adviser to the Federal Government? Is it the intention of the Government to make an appointment of that sort? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DQC</name.id>
<electorate>WEST SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Attorney-General</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HUGHES, William Morris</name>
<name role="display">Mr HUGHES</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not seen the paragraph referred to, but there is no truth in the statement. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COMMONWEALTH CHAUFFEUR</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KDD</name.id>
<electorate>NORTH SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">EDWARDS, George</name>
<name role="display">Mr G B EDWARDS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is it true, as reported in to-day's <inline font-style="italic">Argus,</inline> that the AttorneyGeneral holds that the Commonwealth chauffeur is not amenable to the State Courts for furious driving? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DQC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HUGHES, William Morris</name>
<name role="display">Mr HUGHES</name>
</talker>
<para>- The paragraph in the press is a ridiculous one. The Commonwealth has no power to prevent the prosecution and punishment of the Government chauffeur if he has transgressed the law. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JOK</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BEARD, Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr Beard</name>
</talker>
<para>- Was the chauffeur at Prahran ? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- He says that he was not there at the time when he was said to have been there, and that at that time the car was in the garage, safely locked up. The paragraph is merely an entertaining one, intended to enliven the tedium of a dull time. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CENSUS</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K99</name.id>
<electorate>LANG, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>FT; ANTI-SOC from 1906; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSON, Elliot</name>
<name role="display">Mr W ELLIOT JOHNSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister of Home Affairs lay on the table a copy of the census paper before it is distributed, so that honorable members may have an opportunity to study it? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K5D</name.id>
<electorate>DARWIN, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Home Affairs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'MALLEY, King</name>
<name role="display">Mr KING O'MALLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- It will be laid on the table in a day or two. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>FEDERAL CAPITAL SITE</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZF</name.id>
<electorate>ILLAWARRA, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FULLER, George</name>
<name role="display">Mr FULLER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Minister of Home Affairs promised, three weeks ago, to let honorable members have a small map, showing the contour survey of the Federal Capital Site, but it has not yet been distributed ; when are we likely to get it? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K5D</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'MALLEY, King</name>
<name role="display">Mr KING O'MALLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- It will be available immediately. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>INTER-STATE TRADE</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KGZ</name.id>
<electorate>FREMANTLE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HEDGES, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr HEDGES</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the attention of the Minister of Trade and Customs been called to an article in the <inline font-style="italic">West Australian</inline> of 20th instant, in which it is stated that, since the abolition of Inter- State certificates, no account is kept of the goods sent from State to State, and that the absence of such a record will cause trouble in the future. I should like to know if instructions will be given for the keeping of a record ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWL</name.id>
<electorate>YARRA, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Trade and Customs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TUDOR, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr TUDOR</name>
</talker>
<para>- My attention has been directed to the article, but I have no intention of re-establishing the Inter-State certificates. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KGZ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HEDGES, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr Hedges</name>
</talker>
<para>- I did not ask that that should be done. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>PAPER</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. TUDOR</inline>laid upon the. table the following paper : - </para>
<quote>
<para>Patents Act. - Regulations amended. - Nos. 38, 48,133a-133c, <inline font-style="italic">&c.</inline> - Statutory Rules 1910, No. 85. </para>
</quote>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>POSTMASTER-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Post and Telegraph Association's Grievances - Sorters' and Typists' Overtime</title>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYJ</name.id>
<electorate>BENDIGO, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">QUICK, John</name>
<name role="display">Sir JOHN QUICK</name>
</talker>
<para>- I wish to know from the Postmaster-General whether his attention has been directed to a speech by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. R.</inline> F. Power, secretary to the electrical and mechanical branch of the Post and Telegraph Association, Sydney, reported in the <inline font-style="italic">Sydney Morning Herald</inline> of 24th instant, in which it is stated that the association is doing everything it can to secure the redress of grievances, but that the Postmaster-General is not assisting it, and that the time may come when it may have to try other means. I wish to know what are the "grievances" and what are the "other means" referred to. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3743</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K8L</name.id>
<electorate>BARRIER, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Postmaster-General</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THOMAS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr THOMAS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall be glad if the honorable member will give notice of the question. I may add - I did not intend to. refer to this matter - that in the same speech' <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Power</inline> speaks of a number of persons being sent oyer at <inline font-style="italic">£60</inline> by " the present Postmaster-General." That occurred, not since I have been Postmaster-General, but while the honorable member for Bendigo was in office. On the 21st instant the honorable member for Wentworth asked the following questions about the allowances paid to sorters and typists at the General Post Office, Sydney, for overtime: - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is it not a fact that sorters in the General Post Office, Sydney, are called upon to work eight hours in straight shifts, and seven and a half hours in broken shifts? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Is it not a fact that, in addition to these hours, sorters have to work overtime when required by the Department? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Do sorters get any compensation beyond 1s. 6d. tea money for working overtime less than two hours? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Is it not a fact that the hours of duty of typists in the Inspection Branch, General Post </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">Office, are supposed to be from 9 a.m. until 4.30 p.m. on week days, and from9 a.m. until noon on Saturdays? </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="5.">
<para>Is it not a fact that the said typists are usually called upon to work from one hour to two hours overtime every day, without overtime payment ? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Will the Postmaster-General make such immediate arrangements for the working of his Department as will insure his officers not being called upon to work more than the regular hours of dutylaid down, with liberal overtime payments in the exceptions where emergencies prevent the rule being acted upon? </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">The Deputy Postmaster-General, Sydney, has furnished the following information : - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The Public Service Regulations require sorters on straight shift to work ninety-three hours per fortnight, which is less than an average of eight per day. Sorters on broken shift are required to work eighty-eight hours per fortnight, or an average of seven and a half hours per day, and, if necessary, ninety-three hours per fortnight before overtime can be claimed. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Yes, when the exigencies of the Service require it. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>No compensation beyondtea money for working overtime less than two hours is given until the regulation fortnightly aggregate has been worked. </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>No ; but occasionally the typists are required to attend after 4.30 p.m., Monday to Friday, but not beyond 6 p.m. ; and noon on Saturdays, but not beyond 1 p.m.,to meet urgent pressure of work, and under the Public Service Regulations payment of overtime is not allowed in such cases. </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Arrangements are in operation to insure that officers are not usually worked beyond regulation hours without being paid overtime or granted equivalent time off in accordance with the Public Service Regulations; and authority has been given for the employment of twenty-one temporary assistants in the Mail Branch in anticipation of a similar number of permanent hands being provided on the 1910-11 Estimates. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3744</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>UNIFORM GAUGE: MILITARY TRANSPORT</title>
<page.no>3744</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3744</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate>WENTWORTH, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister of Defence, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>With reference to the Minister's statement that to transport by rail 30,000 troops and materiel from Melbourne to Brisbane under present break of gauge conditions would require sixtythree days, while over a uniform gauge the transport of the above force could be effected in twenty-three days ten hours - how was this computation arrived at? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Did the Defence Department consult the Railway Commissioners of the States before making the above statement? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Seeing that most of the distance is over a single-line railway, how many additional sidings between Melbourne and Brisbane would be required to enable the free transmission backwards and forwards of trains conveying troops and supplies as above to Brisbane and returning for further loads ? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>What would be the cost of making a uniform gauge of (a) 4 feet81/2 inches and (i,) 5 feet 3 inches between Melbourne and Brisbane? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>What would be the cost of making the additional sidings necessary for the above military purposes over the above route? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Does the Government propose to carry out these works? </para>
</item>
<item label="7.">
<para>If so, is it proposed to charge the Defence vote with this expenditure before <inline font-style="italic">(a)</inline> re-arming the forts and (i) equipping the new Defence Forces of the Commonwealth? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3744</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX9</name.id>
<electorate>KALGOORLIE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister (without portfolio)</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRAZER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRAZER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>By calculating the time required to transport the first train load of troops from Melbourne to Brisbane and adding to it the time required to make the change of trains at Wallangarra for the remainder of the troops, this being the limiting factor in the case of different gauges. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>In the case of a uniform gauge the time to be added is based on the number of trains and the average interval in the running time-table. </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="2.">
<para>No. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>The actual number of existing sidings is probably sufficient, but some of them would have to be enlarged. 4 and 5. Commonwealth administration does not include railways, and these questions cannot, therefore, be answered. 6 and 7. These are matters which have not yet been considered by the Government. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">With reference to a reply given on the 14th inst. to a question by the honorable member for Cowper on the same subject, I find that, by a clerical error, it is stated therein that if sufficient platforms and sidings were provided at Wodonga and Wallangarra, the time occupied in transporting 30,000 mounted troops from Melbourne to Brisbane would be reduced to 34 days : the reply should be that the delay would be reduced <inline font-style="italic">by</inline> 34 days. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3744</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IMPORTATION OF TIN PLATES</title>
<page.no>3744</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3744</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JNV</name.id>
<electorate>HERBERT, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BAMFORD, Frederick</name>
<name role="display">Mr BAMFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister of Trade and Customs, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is he aware that about£260,000 worth of tin plates are annually imported? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Is he further aware that Australia has unlimited quantities of iron ore, and annually exports large quantities of tin ingots? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Will he, in view of these facts, consider the advisableness of offering a bonus on the production of tin plates made from Australian minerals? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3744</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TUDOR, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr TUDOR</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>I shall make inquiries and consider whether such a course is desirable. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DESPATCH OF EXPERTS TO EUROPE</title>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KX9</name.id>
<electorate>NEWCASTLE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP; FLP from 1931</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WATKINS, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr WATKINS</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister of External Affairs, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Will the Government arrange from time to time for the despatch of experts to the Old World, whereby its secrets may be won for application to our own industries and primary pursuits? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JOC</name.id>
<electorate>BOOTHBY, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for External Affairs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BATCHELOR, Egerton</name>
<name role="display">Mr BATCHELOR</name>
</talker>
<para>- While the Government are not prepared to give any general undertaking, they will be willing to consider any specific proposals in regard to particular industries that may be placed before them. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PUBLIC SERVICE</title>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Students of Business Colleges</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KX9</name.id>
<electorate>NEWCASTLE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP; FLP from 1931</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WATKINS, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr WATKINS</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister of Home Affairs, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>If in 1909 any Federal Department applied to Messrs. Stott and Hoare for students of their college. If so, what were the circumstances ? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Is it not a fact that all clerical positions in the Federal Departments are secured by competitive examination only? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K5D</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'MALLEY, King</name>
<name role="display">Mr KING O'MALLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are as follow : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>It is only in the event of no suitable applicant being registered for temporary employment as shorthand writer and typist that inquiries would be made by Departments as to obtaining assistance from outside sources ; such inquiries would not be limited to one business college. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Yes, in respect of permanent appointments ; but temporary hands are not subjected to examination where satisfactory proof of capacity is furnished. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">" LAND TAX ASSESSMENT BILL. </para>
<para>
<inline font-style="italic">In Committee</inline>(Consideration resumed from 23rd September, <inline font-style="italic">vide</inline> page 3703) : </para>
</speech>
<para>Clause 3 -</para>
<quote>
<para>In this Act, unless the contrary intention appears - " Trustee," in addition to every person appointed or constituted trustee by act of parties by order or declaration of a Court or by operation of law, includes - </para>
</quote>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>an executor or administrator, guardian, committee, receiver, or liquidator, and </para>
</item>
<item label="(b)">
<para>every person having or taking upon himself the administration or control of land affected by any express or implied trust, or acting in any fiduciary capacity, or having the possession control or management of the land of a person under any legal or- other disability. " Person " includes a company. " Company " includes all bodies or associa tions corporate or unincorporate. "Mortgage" includes any charge whatever upon land, or interest therein, howsoever created, for the securing of money. " Mortgagee " includes every person entitled at law or in equity to a mortgage or any part thereof. " The Commissioner " means the Commissioner of Taxes. </para>
</item>
</list>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KNF</name.id>
<electorate>RICHMOND, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>LP; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MASSY-GREENE, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Mr MASSY-GREENE</name>
</talker>
<para>.- I have circulated a definition of " improvements," which the Bill makes no attempt to define. I admit that there are considerable difficulties in attempting to define improvements, and a danger in doing so of making the definition too restrictive, which we do not want to do. At the same time, as we are throwing the onus of the valuation on the shoulders of the owners of land, they may find considerable difficulty in determining the unimproved value, and what they can or cannot allow as improvements. In the New Zealand and New South Wales Acts an attempt has been made to define improvements; and in one or two of the other States similar attempts have been made. I have consulted some of the legal members of the House, who seem to think that, whilst the amendment I have circulated does, to a certain extent, define improvements, it is not restrictive. I move - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>That the following definition be inserted before the definition of " Trustee":-"' Improvement ' in relation to land means any improvement whatsoever made by the owner or occupier of the land the benefit of which is unexhausted at the time of valuation, and particularly, but not so as to restrict the generality of the above definition, houses, buildings, fencing, planting, dams, excavations for holding water, wells, bores, drainage, irrigation, ringbarking, suckering, clearing from timber or scrub or stone or any noxious weed or plant or shrub and laying down in grass or pasture." </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3745</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JUV</name.id>
<electorate>Franklin</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCWILLIAMS, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McWILLIAMS</name>
</talker>
<para>. - I would draw the attention of the honorable member for Richmond to the fact that if we once commence to define improvements, we shall land ourselves in a perfect quagmire of difficulties. If we confine ourselves to the very brief definition already given, to the effect that the State shall tax all improvements that are created by the State or by the community generally, and that all the improvements effected by the individual himself shall be exempt, we shall be on a good wicket. There are cases where men have spent a great deal of money in what they thought would be improvements, which have turned out absolutely valueless. I know one case where a man had a splendid little , piece of land, brought water on to it and irrigated it, with the result that it took him some years to get rid of the sedges and rushes that the water produced. The expenditure of the money in that case deteriorated the productivity of the land. All over the country one can find instances where large sums of money have been expended without effective results. Sometimes swamps have been attempted to be drained, and the work has. had to go by the board, because it has proved ineffectual. In many cases, heavily timbered country has been tackled, and the cost of clearing the land has been double what the land would bring if put under the hammer to-morrow. If we try to define improvements, and exempt their cost, we shall find the provision absolutely unworkable. A point was raised by the honorable member for Flinders on Friday afternoon, which I think every honorable member would like to see provided for, if possible, but that again would land us in great difficulties. He spoke of cases where men combine together to undertake some semi-public work, which would improve their property*. We should like to see them get the advantage of that ; but let me take a case in point in our own State. We have a municipal rate, the maximum' of which is is. Inland holders have obtained what is called a permissive rate, by which any portion of a shire or ward have a right, of their own free will, to levy an additional rate of up to od. in the £1, and expend the money on a public road, which has been made and maintained by the .Government. The expenditure of that additional sum improves the state of the road, but it would be practically . impossible to define it as an improvement, although it is an improvement of which we should like to see the settlers get the benefit. If Ministers want this Bill to be a workable measure, they will have to exclude all definitions of improvement beyond the simple one, namely, that the unimproved value of land should be that value which the land will bring under the hammer, in open sale, provided no improvements were effected on it. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3746</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAIRMAN, The</name>
<name role="display">The CHAIRMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- We have already decided that point, and are now dealing with the value of improvements. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3746</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JUV</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCWILLIAMS, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr MCWILLIAMS</name>
</talker>
<para>- If this amendment be carried it will destroy the definition altogether, because it will introduce a new system of valuation for improvements. If we once begin to either define or value the cost of improvements, we shall make the Bill practically unworkable. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3746</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJE</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ANTI-SOC; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">IRVINE, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr W H IRVINE</name>
</talker>
<para>. - I hope the Government will -give serious' consideration to the proposed amendment,Two questions are raised, one of which is the intention we desire to embody in the Bill. I suppose there is no doubt that it( is" intended by the Government to exempt, the cost of the clearing of timber from the operation of the tax. The second question- is whether, if that be the intention, the; Bill unamended will give effect- to it. <inline font-style="italic">I:</inline> represent a constituency - and other oem- bers are similiarly interested - in which :he original value of the land was practically nothing compared with the immense value given to it by clearing. Are we to regard the unimproved value as that of the land if we swept every visible and existing improvement away? Are we to take " actual "; as meaning something that is there still as" the result of improvements made? We might leave the land as bare as a table,' without any fences or buildings, and yet it would contain the results of the labour of men who had gone there and spent a vast amount on improvements which are hot visible; and I do not suppose it is the in,tention of the Government not to allow some exemption in regard to such improvements'.' I could understand that there might be a difficulty in measuring the amount of exemp-.tion, because, in some cases, a man mayhave spent money or labour without sufficient care or skill j but in the vast majority". of cases the value of labour or the money actually expended in the clearing remains there to this day. I assume that the Attorney-General would desire to give a substantial exemption in regard to clearing. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3746</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MD</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEAKIN, Alfred</name>
<name role="display">Mr Deakin</name>
</talker>
<para>- As the one improvement without which no other improvement could be accomplished. - </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3746</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJE</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ANTI-SOC; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">IRVINE, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr W H IRVINE</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is the most essential of all improvements. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3746</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JUV</name.id>
<electorate>FRANKLIN, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>REV TAR; ANTI-SOC from 1906; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917; CP from 1920; IND from 1928</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCWILLIAMS, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McWILLIAMS</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is exempt under the Bill. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3746</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJE</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ANTI-SOC; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">IRVINE, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr W H IRVINE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The question is whether it is exempt under the Bill. In Gippsland, for instance, .£10, ,£15, <inline font-style="italic">£20,</inline> and, in many- cases, many more pounds, or labour representing the money, has been expended per acre simply in rendering other improvements possible ; and. of course, that value should not be the subject of taxation. But if that be the view I. am very much afraid the Bill as it stands will not give effect to it. The Bill assumes that the actual improvements thereon or appertaining thereto made by the proprietor or his predecessor in title have not been made; but in all probability " actual " improvements would be read as meaning something which exists at the present time as a substantial entity - as meaning fences, houses, buildings, or something in existence which we might call, in general language, visible improvements. At all events, I think that is the very probable construction ; and if there is any doubt the Bill ought to be made perfectly clear. This would be attained by the amendment of the honorable member for Richmond. Some members entertain an apprehension thatif we enumerate these various particulars there may be a certain danger of exclusion, but I do not think so. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3747</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JOC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BATCHELOR, Egerton</name>
<name role="display">Mr BatcheloR</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the exemption for clearing to go on for ever ? For instance, would the honorable member exempt the original cost of clearing Collins-street? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<para>Mr.W. H. IRVINE. - The cost of clearing Collins-street, compared with the improved value of land in Melbourne, is so infinitesimal that we may neglect it altogether, and it certainly would not be regarded in any land tax assessment. We are not talking about land at £1,000 or £1,200 per foot, but land at . £10 or £12 an acre. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3747</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JOC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BATCHELOR, Egerton</name>
<name role="display">Mr Batchelor</name>
</talker>
<para>- We are enacting provisions that will remain for all time in an Act of Parliament. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3747</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJE</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ANTI-SOC; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">IRVINE, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr W H IRVINE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Certainly ; and 1 suppose that if a man could prove what it cost to clear an acre in Collins-street he could have an exemption. I should say, however, that there were a few gum trees, and that the cost of clearingwas about £1 per acre; so that it is talking nonsense to cite that as an illustration. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3747</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JOC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BATCHELOR, Egerton</name>
<name role="display">Mr Batchelor</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is talking nonsense to attempt to define the value of improvements ! </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3747</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJE</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ANTI-SOC; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">IRVINE, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr W H IRVINE</name>
</talker>
<para>- We cannot define anything in this connexion with mathematical accuracy, nor is it necessary ; but we desire some approach to substantial justice. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3747</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KXP</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PALMER, Albert</name>
<name role="display">Mr Palmer</name>
</talker>
<para>- The owner has to prove the improvements. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3747</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJE</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>