/
19111122_reps_4_62.xml
7827 lines (7827 loc) · 498 KB
/
19111122_reps_4_62.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1911-11-22</date>
<parliament.no>4</parliament.no>
<session.no>2</session.no>
<period.no>0</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>3003</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para>House of Representatives. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1911-11-22</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr.</inline>Speaker took the chair at 2.30 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3003</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>POSTMASTER-GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT</title>
<page.no>3003</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para class="block">Cable Rates - Telegraph Messengers - Savings Bank at Duntroon - Wireless Telegraphy. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3003</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSM</name.id>
<electorate>CALARE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BROWN, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Mr THOMAS BROWN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the PostmasterGeneral in a position to give the House information regarding the telegrams from New Zealandin to-day's newspapers, which state th'at it is proposed to reduce the rates for cabling, and to increase the facilities ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3003</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX9</name.id>
<electorate>KALGOORLIE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Postmaster-General</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRAZER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRAZER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Government have received a communication from, the High Commissioner, notifying that the Pacific Cable Board proposes to reduce the rates for press cables from9d. to 4½d. a word, on the condition that these cables shall be liable to a delay of not more than twelve hours, and asks for our concurrence. It is our intention to agree to the proposal; and should the Atlantic companies also do so, the new arrangement will probably take effect from ist January next. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KHU</name.id>
<electorate>DALLEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOWE, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Mr HOWE</name>
</talker>
<para>- As, under a recent order of the Commissioner, the pay for telegraph, messengers in their first year has been increased from 10s. to 15s. a week, will the Minister see that a proportionate increase is given to boys in their second, third, and fourth years? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX9</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRAZER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRAZER</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the honorable member's representation, I shall look into the matter. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KRN</name.id>
<electorate>MORETON, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SINCLAIR, Hugh</name>
<name role="display">Mr SINCLAIR</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has any arrangement yet been made to provide banking facilities for the men employed at Duntroon? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX9</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRAZER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRAZER</name>
</talker>
<para>- While the Works Estimates were being discussed, I promised to look into the matter, and I have since asked the Deputy Postmaster-General in Sydney, to interview representatives of the State Government, in order that facilities for banking money may be provided at Duntroon. I am not yet aware of the result of the interview. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KXO</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PAGE, James</name>
<name role="display">Mr Page</name>
</talker>
<para>- When did the Minister ask the Deputy Postmaster-General to do that ? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX9</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRAZER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRAZER</name>
</talker>
<para>- A week or so ago. The provision of Savings Bank facilities is not within the powers of the Department. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JNV</name.id>
<electorate>HERBERT, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BAMFORD, Frederick</name>
<name role="display">Mr BAMFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- Are any steps being taken with a view to establishing wireless telegraphic communication between Papua and the mainland ; and, if so, when can the Postmaster-General say whether the station will be on Thursday Island, or somewhere on the mainland? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX9</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRAZER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRAZER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I hope to be able to make a definite statement to the House in ten days at the outside, indicating the policy the Government intend to pursue in regard to wireless telegraph stations; and also informing honorable members as to the particular localities' of the stations. The question raised by the honorable member for Herbert is now the subject of inquiry, namely, whether, in connecting Papua with the mainland the station shall be on Thursday Island, or somewhere on the Queensland coast. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFJ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORREST, John</name>
<name role="display">Sir John Forrest</name>
</talker>
<para>- It should have been done four years ago. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX9</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRAZER, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRAZER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Then, why did the right honorable gentleman not see to the matter when he was in office? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LITHGOW IRON BOUNTY</title>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K9R</name.id>
<electorate>ROBERTSON, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr W J JOHNSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has any communication been addressed to the Minister of Trade and Customs, calling into question the integrity or competency of MrPaul, the Royal Commissioner who inquired into the iron industry in New South Wales, to act as an " authorized person" under the Iron Bounties Act? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWL</name.id>
<electorate>YARRA, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Trade and Customs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TUDOR, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr TUDOR</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have had no such communication. I believe that there is not the slightest doubt as to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Paul's</inline> ability. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSM</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BROWN, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Mr THOMAS BROWN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister of Trade and Customs seen ' in the Sydney <inline font-style="italic">Daily Telegraph,</inline> of Monday last, a report of an interview with <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. G.</inline> H. Hoskins, relative to the iron industry at Lithgow? From this interview it appears that about 23,730 tons of -slag was used in the manufacture of iron on which a bonus has been paid. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Hoskins,</inline> in the interview, said that he understood that the Department is quite satisfied that the slag should be used in the production of iron, and that the bonus was properly claimed. He went on to say that he had consulted , with, an officer of the Department, who raised no objection, and that if an objection had been raised the slag would not _ have been used. I desire to know whether that is a correct statement of the position, and, further, whether the Minister proposes to pay a bonus on slag in the future as, apparently, has been the case in the past ? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TUDOR, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr TUDOR</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not seen the newspaper report referred to. Already some .£1,400, or it may be ^2,000, has been stopped from the bonus claimed by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Hoskins.</inline> ' At the present time there is more bonus owing' to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Hoskins</inline> than it is possible for him to lose, even if we deduct on account ;of the whole of the slag that has been used. For the past two months <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Hoskins</inline> has not used any slag, and it is not' his intention to use any until this question is settled. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NAVAL COLLEGE</title>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3004</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KTU</name.id>
<electorate>DENISON, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>ALP; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SMITH, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr LAIRD SMITH</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have been credibly informed that the Tasmanian Government is prepared to transfer to the Federal Government a piece of land on the Rivet Derwent, near Hobart, free of cost, and believed to be suitable for the erection thereon of the proposed Naval College. In view of this fact, I ask the Prime Minister if he will kindly give the question of fixing the site for the aforesaid College further consideration before finally deciding where it shall be established ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate>WIDE BAY, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Prime Minister</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have no official information of the proposed transfer. It is a sign of the times. We are always glad to know of the readiness of States to transfer property to the Commonwealth, but this offer comes too late, as the site of the Naval College has been fixed at Jervis Bay. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate>WENTWORTH, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Did not the Prime Minister inform honorable members that the House would have an opportunity to fix the site of the Naval College. If so, will he adhere to his promise? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is not a fact that I said honorable members would have an opportunity to fix the site. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K99</name.id>
<electorate>LANG, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>FT; ANTI-SOC from 1906; LP from 1910; NAT from 1917</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JOHNSON, Elliot</name>
<name role="display">Mr W ELLIOT JOHNSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Prime Minister said that they would have an opportunity to consider the matter. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I said that I would make to the House a statement of the policy of the Government in this matter. The House has always the right to alter what is done. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4S</name.id>
<electorate>PARRAMATTA, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOK, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Mr JOSEPH COOK</name>
</talker>
<para>-The other night the Prime Minister announced the decision of the Government in regard to the site, but a statement of policy means more than that. Will he inform us why the site has been changed from Burraneer Bay to Jervis Bay? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Government is responsible for the decision, and an announcement of policy was made afterwards to the House. When the Estimates are being discussed, there will be an opportunity to criticise that and every other action of this Administration. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFK</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GROOM, Littleton</name>
<name role="display">Mr Groom</name>
</talker>
<para>- Are the papers available? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not think that there is any objection to making the papers available to honorable members. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the fact that the location of the site of the Naval College was covered by an item in the Works Estimates which has been dealt with, will the Prime Minister, in the event of the discussion of the subject on the EstimatesinChief being ruled out of order, give honorable members a special opportunity to consider the question ? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Government has no control of the conduct of business in Committee by the Chairman, but we shall offer no objection to the matter being reasonably discussed and determined if honorable members opposite desire. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JUV</name.id>
<electorate>FRANKLIN, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCWILLIAMS, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr McWILLIAMS</name>
</talker>
<para>- When the Minister of Defence is considering the question of providing temporary accommodation for the students of the Naval College, will he bear in mind the site in the vicinity of Hobart, which was, I believe, selected by the naval experts, and which the State Government were prepared to hand over as a free gift? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KZG</name.id>
<electorate>ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister (without portfolio)</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ROBERTS, Ernest</name>
<name role="display">Mr ROBERTS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not heard that the experts selected any particular site in Tasmania for the Naval College, but I understand that if honorable members or any State Governments have sites to suggest on which temporary buildings may be erected, the Minister will be pleased to receive their suggestions at the earliest possible moment. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NORTH-WEST COAST</title>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KLB</name.id>
<electorate>COOLGARDIE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MAHON, Hugh</name>
<name role="display">Mr MAHON</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Prime Minister received a communication from the Government of Western Australia, stating that in consequence of the strike which has brought about the laying up of the <inline font-style="italic">Koombana,</inline> the people on the northwest coast are without a mail service, and unable to obtain necessary supplies? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr FISHER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not remember receiving such a communication, but I shall make inquiries, and let the honorable member know later in the day. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TARIFF RECIPROCITY WITH NEW ZEALAND</title>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEX</name.id>
<electorate>BRISBANE, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FINLAYSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr FINLAYSON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister of Trade and Customs, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Whether the Government have taken any steps towards establishing reciprocal Tariff relations with New Zealand and Canada? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, is the Minister able to inform the House as to the prospects of mutually satisfactory arrangements being arrived at with either Dominion, or both? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>If no steps have yet been taken in the matter, do the Government propose to take any action, and when ? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3005</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KWL</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">TUDOR, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr TUDOR</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are - 1 - 3. The question of reciprocal trade relationships with the sister Dominions has already received serious attention, and it is the desire of the Government, at the earliest convenient opportunity, to submit proposals in the direction indicated. . </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3006</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>COTTESLOE RIFLE RANGE</title>
<page.no>3006</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3006</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWG</name.id>
<electorate>PERTH, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FOWLER, James</name>
<name role="display">Mr FOWLER</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister of Defence', <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>What is the maximum range at which shooting can be carried on at the new rifle range at Cottesloe, Western Australia? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Is the distance of1 mile 63 chains from the nearest railway station to the range not likely to seriously interfere with its use by riflemen ? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Is the existing range at Karrakatta to be discontinued entirely? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3006</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KZG</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ROBERTS, Ernest</name>
<name role="display">Mr ROBERTS</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The maximum range at present is 600 yards. It is proposed, this year, to build twenty targets with a maximum range of 1,000 yards. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Not seriously. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>COMMONWEALTH BANK BILL</title>
<page.no>3006</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Second Reading</title>
<page.no>3006</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Debate resumed from 21st November <inline font-style="italic">(vide</inline> page 2907), on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Fisher</inline> - </para>
<quote>
<para>That this Bill be now read a second time. </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3006</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate>Wentworth</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>. - I do not propose to weary the House with any excursions into ancient history in connexion with government banking proposals, though the temptation to do so is almost irresistible All through the ages, in every stage of national development, and in every stage of the mental development of statesmen, we have had the latter reaching out after this apparently simple method of gaining revenues without cost to the people. However, the lesson to be derived from past failures in this connexion - the inevitable lesson that easy revenues derivable from banking are only a mirage by which ignorant State financiers have been led to national ruin - has already been dealt with fairly fully by honorable members on this side of the House. I propose briefly to address myself to the principles underlying the measure before us. </para>
</talk.start>
<para>A House of this kind should be prepared to travel into this new sphere without undue fear, if it can be conclusively shown that this new agency of government will serve some useful Government purpose. If, for instance, we were to find some special profit accruing to the Government through a Government Bank handling the conversion, renewal, and flotation of loans, or controlling currency, I can imagine that it would be the duty of the House to proceed to the earnest discussion of the measure without being unduly timorous because of the failures and errors of bygone centuries. But I do not see in the measure before us any such proposal. I do not see a single sign, in either the Bill or the Prime Minister's speech that this measure is proposed to facilitate some Government purposeof the character referred to. There is no sign that this proposed' bank will facilitate the conversion, flotation or renewal of loans. In fact, if we carefully examine the Bill and its antecedents, we see that that is not the intention of the Government or the intention of the Bill. Further, we know that currency which ought properly to be handled by a bank - since currency is' largely a matter of supply and demand, and must be dealt with in elastic ways - is debarred from the comprehension of this measure under one of the clauses. Consequently we have to look at this proposal purely as a money-making one - a proposal designed vaguely to raise money in some way, the difficulties of which, I am afraid, are not thoroughly realized by Ministers. I think that the Government generally have an idea that there is money in banking; and where there is money they, of course, desire the State to share. </para>
<para>That Ministers were not the originators of this proposal is transparent to anybody who cares to examine even casually the recent political history of Australia in this connexion. If honorable members will go back to the Brisbane Conference of three years ago, they will find that this bank owes its origin to a general idea, prevalent in that Conference, that a Government bank might assist an arrangement of the general finances of the Australian people - the finances as between Commonwealth and States, and' especially as affecting the transfer of debts from the States to the Commonwealth. I find, according to the Brisbane <inline font-style="italic">Worker</inline> of 18th July, 1908 - and I think that in the Brisbane <inline font-style="italic">Worker</inline> the best report of the Conference is to be found - that this question was introduced at the Conference by the present Minister of Home Affairs, whois reported as having said that " he wanted a banking system included in any financial arrangement which the Conference might approve for the Commonwealth and States." The honorable member then proceeded to show what type of banking schemehe thought Australian requirements made necessary. His scheme was a co-operative banking concern as between the Commonwealth and the States. As reported in the Brisbane <inline font-style="italic">Worker,</inline> we find that it was to be a bank of deposit, issue, exchange, and reserve, with a capital of £1,200,000, of which not less than , £600,000 should be held by the Commonwealth, and not more than £100,000 by any State in the Australian Commonwealth. His idea, I under" stand, was that not only in regard to the conversion of loans and such operations, but also in the handling of the ordinary Savings Banks business of the various States, the States would feel that they themselves had some peculiar interest in the new undertaking, in the management of which they would have some voice. That proposal on the part of the present Minister of Home Affairs was resisted by the late <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Batchelor</inline> and <inline font-weight="bold">Senator Lynch,</inline> who proposed that the subject of banking, being so important in itself, be referred to a Committee entirely apart from the subjects of State finance and borrowing. That amendment was lost, and the original motion moved by the present Minister of Home Affairs was referred to the Finance Committee of that Conference. According to the following issue of the Brisbane <inline font-style="italic">Worker,</inline><inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Holman,</inline> one of the leaders of the Labour movement in New South Wales, and one of the most brilliant men in that movement throughout Australia, introduced this subject again to the notice of the Conference. It was part and parcel of a whole series of financial proposals, the first of which read - </para>
<quote>
<para>That Conference approves the general outlines of <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. King</inline> O'Malley's scheme relating to the establishment of a National bank. </para>
<para>That bank, as I have pointed out, was to be upon co-operative lines. In the course of the debate which followed, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Watson,</inline> a former Prime Minister of Australia, and I think it will be admitted, a prominent leader of the Labour movement to-day, said that he was in agreement with the principle of <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. King</inline> O'Malley's scheme for a Commonwealth National bank. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. McGowen,</inline> the Premier of New South Wales, who occupies to-day a position which entitles weight to be given to his words, said - </para>
<para>He felt that the Labour movement was under a lasting debt of gratitude to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Malley.</inline> For thirty years he had been advocating a National bank, and <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. O'Malley</inline> had put the machinery and operation of it in a concrete form. "Then I find that the scheme as a whole - a scheme for a co-operative State and Com monwealth Bank combined, to deal with banking facilities affecting directly Government agencies - was then approved by the Conference. That is the history of these proposals, as originated at the Conference, when this scheme for a Government bank was placed upon the fighting platform of the Labour party. </para>
<para>The proposal now before us, however, has departed fundamentally from that conception. The scheme now before us is the very antithesis of that adopted by the Brisbane Conference. This proposal, to use almost the Prime Minister's own words, is one to make money. It has nothing to do with the government of the country ; and therefore, as far as possible, must be divorced from political control. This is a scheme merely to add to the various money-making banks throughout Australia, and not to carry out the present Minister of Home Affairs' broad conception which was submitted to, and carried by, the Brisbane Conference three years ago. I do not wish, however, to enter into a discussion of the comparative merits of the two proposals. I am satisfied that my honorable friends opposite, who, by the very constitution of their party, have to pay considerable attention to the will of their party outside this Parliament, as expressed in these periodic Conferences, would not have departed from theinstructions of the Brisbane Conference unless they had had very good grounds for doing so. I do not know what' their grounds were. They keep their secrets remarkably well ; but the fact remains that they have thrown overboard that Conference, which, apparently, was almost unanimous, and have, for some reason unknown to the Opposition - and, I presume, unknown also to the Conference - departed from the proposals which they had previously accepted, and which formed the basis of the particular mandate which they claim to have from the people in this connexion. </para>
</quote>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3007</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4S</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COOK, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Mr Joseph Cook</name>
</talker>
<para>- They have thrown over, not only the Brisbane Conference, but their own manifesto. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3007</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Exactly. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3007</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CARR, Ernest</name>
<name role="display">Mr Carr</name>
</talker>
<para>- That need not concern the honorable member. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3007</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- It concerns me only as a critic, and I think it concerns the honorable member as one of the subscribers to the manifesto issued by the Labour party before the last general election. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3007</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CARR, Ernest</name>
<name role="display">Mr Carr</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is my business. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3008</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- And is, as is perhaps only appropriate, a bad business. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para class="block">W.'e are now confronted with the duty of analyzing this measure, and of ascertaining whether it is designed in the best way to arrive at its alleged object. Its alleged object is to find money, out of banking, for the Commonwealth. It is proposed to do that ir» two ways : First of all, by entering into competition for private banking business in the Australian Commonwealth and without it; and secondly, by absorbing, eventually, the State Savings Banks throughout Australia. This bank, being started to make money, we will find, is started upon borrowed capital, despite the fact that we have "heard a lot from honorable members opposite about the iniquity of borrowing. This, however, will not be the first time they have borrowed. We know that they have succeeded in borrowing from the Australian public some £10,000,000 without interest - that is to say, to the extent of the note issue now circulating in Australia. For that issue, of course, golden sovereigns have been given by the public, and portion of that shortdated loan of £10,000,000 has already been used for revenue purposes. My honorable friends opposite have always denounced borrowing, even for reproductive works. Borrowing, they have said, is vicious, mischievous, dangerous, and must be discontinued. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3008</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4N</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FISHER, Andrew</name>
<name role="display">Mr Fisher</name>
</talker>
<para>- Nonsense ! </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3008</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- We find, however, that the very first action taken by the Prime Minister, who can so clearly express the profundity of his knowledge upon this subject, is to borrow from the Australian public - who are to be gulled into the belief that they have given nothing in exchange for the notes they are handling - some £10,000,000, portion of which has already been used to meet die current necessities of the year. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3008</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K5D</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">O'MALLEY, King</name>
<name role="display">Mr King O'Malley</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is good financing. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3008</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is extraordinary financing - the sort of financing which occasionally makes Wall-street unpopular - but it is not consistent politics. If the Labour party are against borrowing for reproductive works, they ought to be against borrowing to meet revenue deficiencies. They ought also to be against borrowing to start a trading organization. In this Bill, however, they are actually borrowing to start a bank which is to incur obligations and liabilities over which Parliament will have little, if any, control. They have not only sunk the issue of non-borrowing for reproductive works, but have actually borrowed for revenue purposes, and are borrowing now to start a trading venture. Some of the money to start this bank is to be borrowed at interest by means of debentures, but in addition a sum for incidental expenses, which may be ,£50,000 or £5,000,000, can be advanced without interest by the Treasurer. If, for instance, the bank cares to start expensive buildings in the various capitals, the Bill gives authority to the Treasurer to advance without interest the money required for that purpose. The Bill, therefore, provides for borrowing with interest, and without interest, to start what is purely a trading venture. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>An interesting feature in connexion with the financing of the bank is that, while the Government loftily declare that the Commonwealth is responsible for the operations of the bank, a special provision makes only the bank suable ! That is a delightful Gilbertian proposal which should commend itself to the close attention of all those who are faced with the desirability of lending the Government bank money. </para>
<para>Another curious feature is that the general banking and Savings Bank businesses are pooled. That is an extremely bad practice. Savings Bank business ought to be upon> the safest foundation possible, but in these proposals it and its profits and its security are placed on exactly the same basis asthe general trading business to be carried on by the bank as a whole, and are therefore subjected to the same risks. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3008</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DQC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HUGHES, William Morris</name>
<name role="display">Mr Hughes</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is not that a safe basis ? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3008</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">KELLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr KELLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not think so. The two matters ought to be divorced. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3008</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>DQC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HUGHES, William Morris</name>