/
19230813_reps_9_105.xml
5956 lines (5956 loc) · 398 KB
/
19230813_reps_9_105.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1923-08-13</date>
<parliament.no>9</parliament.no>
<session.no>2</session.no>
<period.no>1</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">House of Representatives. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1923-08-13</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker</inline>(Rt. Hon. W. A. Watt) took the chair at 3 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NEW GUINEA</title>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4Q</name.id>
<electorate>YARRA, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLIN, James Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Prime Minis ter in a position to reply to the question </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">I asked him about a week ago, concern ing an application for a leasehold in New Guinea by one Carl Frost? The right honorable gentleman said that he would inquire into the matter and would supply the information for which I asked. The application for the leasehold was made five years ago. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Minister for External Affairs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall try to get the information for the honorable member at once. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NAURU</title>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Application of Navigation Act</para>
<para>Mr.CHARLTON asked the Prime Minister, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
<quote>
<para>In view of the fact that 50 per cent. or more ofthe trade from Nauru comes to Australia, will be sympathetically consider the question of negotiating with the New Zealand and British Governments atthe Imperial Conference, with a view to the application of the Australian Navigation Act to the shipping of Nauru? </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answer to the honorable member's question is as follows : - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Nauru has been exempted from the provisions of the Navigation Act by yearly exemptions. The present exemption does not expire until 31st December next. This is a matter in which, as honorable members are aware, both Great Britain and New Zealand are interested equally with the Commonwealth Government. Before the expiration of the present period of exemption, the whole matter will be considered. </para>
</quote>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TAXATION OFFICERS</title>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Conditions of Transfer to States</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2598</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLY</name.id>
<electorate>BOURKE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANSTEY, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr ANSTEY</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Prime Minister, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Will he give an assurance that no Commonwealth officer who is transferred to the permanent service of the State, as a result of the Taxation Agreement, will suffer diminution of the total remuneration received by him immediately prior to his transfer? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>As cost of living, basic wage, higher duties, and child endowment allowances are not paid by the State Service, as is done by the Commonwealth Service, what adjustment will be made in order to preserve these allowances for, and the relative seniority of, Commonwealth officers who are transferred to the State Service? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Will the rates of pay as granted by arbitration awards, including awards made since the 1st June, 1923, be payable to Commonwealth officers covered thereby on transfer to the State? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Will the Prime Minister enumerate what are the existing and accruing rights which will be preserved toCommonwealth officers who are transferred to the State? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>Is it proposed to absorb asmany as possible of the Federal taxation officers into other branches of the Commonwealth Service before the transfer of Federal taxation officers to the State Service takes place? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>If so, what are the actual or approximate numbers and grades or classes of officers of the Federal Taxation Department in New South Wales who will be absorbed into the other branches of the Commonwealth Service? </para>
</item>
<item label="7.">
<para>What are the actual or approximate numbers and grades or classes of Federal taxation officers in South Australia, Tasmania, Queensland, and Victoria who will be absorbed into other branches of the Commonwealth Service, if taxation agreements are signed with those States ? </para>
</item>
<item label="8.">
<para>What provision will be made to preserve the seniority and other rights of officers who may be retransferred to the Commonwealth Service in the event of the lapsing of the Taxation agreement with any State? </para>
</item>
<item label="9.">
<para>Will Commonwealth officers who are transferred to the State and afterwards found to be excess be eligible for, and entitled to, absorption (without reduction in salary or status) into the Commonwealth Service before being compulsorily retired from the State Service? 10. (a) Is it proposed to transfer Commonwealth officers to the State Service without the consent of such officers; (b) if so, under what authority will such compulsory transfer be made ? 11. (a) What authority will be responsible for directing the retirement of Commonwealth officers who are found to be excess after transfer to the State Service; (b) on what basis will compensation be paid to such officers? </para>
</item>
<item label="12.">
<para>Will Commonwealth officers who are transferred to the State Service in New South Wales participate in awards applicable to State officers? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is not possible to furnish the information asked for. All the questions are receiving consideration. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NEW GUINEA EXPROPRIATION BOARD</title>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Dismissal of L. F. D. Carter</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KX9</name.id>
<electorate>NEWCASTLE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WATKINS, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr WATKINS</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister representing the Minister for Home and Territories, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>Whether he will lay on the table of the House the papers concerning the. dismissal of L. F. D. Carter by the Expropriation Board, Rabaul ? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JMG</name.id>
<electorate>WILMOT, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Vice-President of the Executive Council</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ATKINSON, Llewelyn</name>
<name role="display">Mr ATKINSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member asks that the papers he laid on the table of the House,but as the position will be fully met by laying them on the table of the Library, hewill find them there in due course. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NAVIGATION</title>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Transfer of State Officers</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KLL</name.id>
<electorate>for Mr. F. McDonald</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MAKIN, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Mr MAKIN</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister for Trade and Customs, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Does the Government, in taking overthe navigation work from the States, contemplate taking over also the State officers now doing that work ? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, will the Government safeguard the existing State rights of those officers as far as possible ? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX7</name.id>
<electorate>EDEN-MONARO, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Minister for Health</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAPMAN, Austin</name>
<name role="display">Mr AUSTIN CHAPMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are as follow: - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>The Commonwealth is taking over a portion only of the navigation work at present administered by the State Governments, and such State officers as are necessary and suitable will be taken over. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>So far as the law permits, the rights of State officers taken over will be safeguarded. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>RETURNED SOLDIERS</title>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Sick Pay and Sick Leave</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KXD</name.id>
<electorate>FREMANTLE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WATSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr WATSON</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Prime Minister, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Are there among the returned soldiers employed in the Public Service some who,by reason of their war service, are subject to attacks of ill-health, compelling their absence from duty? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Are these officers subject to the ordinary rules regarding sick leave and pay; if so, will the Government consider the granting of special concessions to meet such cases? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are as follow : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>It is probable there are such cases. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Under the present Public Service regulations a special concession is granted to returned soldiers who are permanent officers of the Service in connexion with sick leave inasmuch as absences which occurred during the three years subsequent to discharge are not deducted from the amount of sick leave to which such officer is entitled. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>Special provision is also made under the regulations for the granting of sick leave to returned soldiers temporarily employed when the absence is due to war service disability. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>RETIRED NAVY OFFICERS</title>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Provision for Training</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2599</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMU</name.id>
<electorate>WENTWORTH, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MARKS, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Mr MARKS</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister for Defence, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is it a fact that in the event of hostilities all retired Royal Navy officers - pensioners and men - are by an Order in Council made available for and atthe disposal of the Royal Australian Navy? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>What provision exists to enable such officers and men to keep themselves up to date and efficient in their respective duties after many years' skilled service in the Navy? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>In the absence of any adequate provision, would it not be possible to arrange for a stated number of days' training afloat in ships and ashore in establishments of the Royal Australian Navy? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JRH</name.id>
<electorate>PARRAMATTA, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Minister for Defence</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BOWDEN, Eric</name>
<name role="display">Mr BOWDEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are as follow: - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Arrangements have been adopted between the Imperial and the Commonwealth Governments for regulating the extent to which the services of retired Royal Navy officers and pension ratings permanently domiciled in Australia may be utilized by the Commonwealth Government at a time of mobilization. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>No provision exists at present except in the case of annual training of members of the special reserve of engineer officers, R.N., resident in Australia. The question of training of certain other classes is receiving consideration. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>This will receive consideration. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>UNDESIRABLE IMMIGRANTS</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMU</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MARKS, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Mr MARKS</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister for Defence, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has his attention been drawn to the statementof <inline font-weight="bold">Major B.</inline> Sampson, State Director of Immigration, Tasmania, that some of the boys sent out by Australia House were not of a desirable type, and that in one case alad had been sent back to him, and that he <inline font-weight="bold">(Major Sampson)</inline> had to find this lad a place in the Navy? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Are references as to character necessary before entry can be made into the Navy. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Has any lad beenadmitted to the Navy upon a reference as tq character from <inline font-weight="bold">Major Sampson?</inline></para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JRH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BOWDEN, Eric</name>
<name role="display">Mr BOWDEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are as follow : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Yes. </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>Inquiries are being made. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MINERS' PHTHISIS</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Laboratory of Health, Kalgoorlie</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KF9</name.id>
<electorate>KALGOORLIE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP; FLP from 1931; ALP from 1936</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GREEN, Albert</name>
<name role="display">Mr A GREEN</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Prime Minister, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>In view of the ravages of the dread industrial disease of miners' phthisis among the miners in Kalgoorlie and Boulder, will he arrange for the establishment of the bureau, as already promised, to deal with this scourge - the bureau to be proceeded with immediately? </para>
</quote>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- As I have already indicatedto honorable members, the ques tion of establishing a Laboratory of Health at Kalgoorlie will receive the fullest consideration of the Government. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BRITISH IMPERIAL OIL COMPANY</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Income Tax</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQP</name.id>
<electorate>KENNEDY, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCDONALD, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr C McDONALD</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Trea surer, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Has the Government done anything to recover income tax from the British Imperial Oil Company? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>If so, what is the nature of the steps taken? </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. BRUCE</inline>(for <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Earle</inline> Page).The law imposes upon the officials the duty of maintaining secrecy with regard to the affairs of taxpayers, but it may be said that all steps required by the law have been taken in relation to the British Imperial Oil Company. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ALL-METAL AEROPLANES</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KF9</name.id>
<electorate>KALGOORLIE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP; FLP from 1931; ALP from 1936</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GREEN, Albert</name>
<name role="display">Mr A GREEN</name>
</talker>
<para>asked the Minister for Defence, <inline font-style="italic">upon notice -</inline></para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is it correct, as reported, that the Defence authorities have received a report from the British Air Ministry in which it is stated, <inline font-style="italic">inter alia,</inline> that all-metal aeroplanes for various duties had been developed? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>In view of the previous contention of the Director of Civil Aviation, that the holding up of the proposed Derby- Wyndham aerial mail service was in part due to the unsuitableness of wooden 'planes, will the Minister immediately cause full inquiries to be made regarding this new type of all-metal aeroplane, with a view to the extension of the service from Derby to Wyndham? </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JRH</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BOWDEN, Eric</name>
<name role="display">Mr BOWDEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The answers to the honorable member's questions are as follow : - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Reports have been received from the British Air Ministry recently detailing the progress made towards the perfecting of all-metal construction for aeroplanes. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>The Australian Liaison Officer with the Air Ministry has been instructed to keep the Defence Department fully informed of all progress made in experimental all-metalmachines. In anticipation of suitable aeroplanes being manufactured, an officer of the Department commences a survey between Derby and Wyndham early in September to determine whether the. nature of the country there is such that aeroplanes of any description could be used for regular communication purposes. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>NAVIGATION ACT</title>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Suspension of Regulations</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2600</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 1st August the honorable member for Kalgoorlie asked for certain information regarding the s.s. <inline font-style="italic">Gascoyne</inline> and other vessels which trade on the north-west coast of Australia. I promised to obtain the desired particulars, and have now ascertained that since the granting of the permits to the vessels in question a call was made at Wyndham by the s.s. <inline font-style="italic">Gorgon</inline> on the 26th June last. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2601</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CANNING OF PEACHES</title>
<page.no>2601</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Appointment of Mr. Ennis</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2601</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAPMAN, Austin</name>
<name role="display">Mr AUSTIN CHAPMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 19th July the honorable member for Melbourne <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr. Maloney)</inline> asked the following questions: - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Is it a fact that a few months ago about 1,500 tons of peaches were sent by train from Melbourne to Sydney, and carted from Sydney to Stanmore and <inline font-weight="bold">Mr Druitt</inline> to be canned, the freight and. carriage charge being about £6 per ton? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>Is it not a fact that these peaches could have been canned in Melbourne, and have saved the taxpayers about £9,000 in charges? </para>
</item>
<item label="3.">
<para>If so, who is responsible for this loss? </para>
</item>
<item label="4.">
<para>Will the Minister take steps to obtain a report, and when the facts are established, suitably deal with those responsible? </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>Is it a fact that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Ennis</inline> was appointed without consultation with the present Fruit Advisory Board, and without their knowledge? </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>Is it a fact that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Ennis</inline> has been for years past in the employ of Californian fruitcanners ? </para>
</item>
<item label="7.">
<para>Is it a fact that no Australian canners would appoint an American like <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Ennis</inline> to sell Australian fruit, knowing that America was their only opponent? </para>
</item>
<item label="8.">
<para>Does the Government take the responsibility of having made this appointment; and, if so, on what grounds? </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">I am now in a position to furnish the honorable member with the following information : - </para>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>Yes, but the quantity of peaches sent was 911 tons (not " about 1,500 tons" as stated). The fruit was forwarded to Sydney (not from Melbourne, as stated), but mainly from the north-eastern districts of Victoria. The total freight and cartage was £41s.8d. per ton (not about £6 per ton as stated).The freight and cartage to Melbourne would have cost £1 15s. per ton. </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>No, the peaches could not have been canned by the Melbourne canneries, as they were fully supplied. Further, the owners of the bulk of the peaches referred to were under contracts (made prior to the formation of the Pool) to supply the fruit to the Sydney factories. The extra cost for freight and cartage was £2,1 26 (not about £9,000 as stated). This extra cost is included in the sale price of the canned fruit which is sold in New South Wales and Queensland. 3 and 4. See reply to Nos. 1 and 2. </para>
</item>
<item label="5.">
<para>Yes. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Ennis</inline> was appointed in connexion with the sale in London of the 1921- 1922 Fruit Pools. The present Fruit Advisory Board is not dealing with these fruits, but is handling the 1922-23 pack. </para>
</item>
<item label="6.">
<para>No. </para>
</item>
<item label="7.">
<para>The information obtained shows that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Ennis</inline> is not an American, but is of British nationality. </para>
</item>
<item label="8.">
<para>Yes, because <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Ennis</inline> possesses the requisite commercial and technical knowledge for the position. </para>
</item>
</list>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2601</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CUSTOMSRE VENUE</title>
<page.no>2601</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Primary Produce</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2601</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAPMAN, Austin</name>
<name role="display">Mr AUSTIN CHAPMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- On 27th July, the honorable member for Forrest <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Prowse)</inline> asked the following question : - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>In view of the published statement that farmers are well protected by Customs duties on the following products: - Sheep, pigs, cattle, horses, bacon, butter, and cheese, butter substitute, egg albumen, egg yolk, bananas, dried fruits, wheat, barley, maize, hay and chaff, honey, jams and jellies, hops, lard and lard oil, linseed meal, malt, meat (fresh or smoked), frozen meat, preserved milk, onions, straw, vegetables - will he state the revenue received by the Customs Department during the past twelve months under each of the above items? </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">I am now in a position to furnish the honorable member with the following information : - </para>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="105331192308134_3_0.jpg" />
</para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>IMPORTATION OF BUTTER</title>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JX7</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHAPMAN, Austin</name>
<name role="display">Mr AUSTIN CHAPMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 9th August the honorable member for Capricornia (Mr.Forde) asked the following questions: - </para>
</talk.start>
<list type="decimal-dotted">
<item label="1.">
<para>What is the total (a) quantity and the value of butter imported in bond into Victoria during the year ending 30th June, 1923; (b) quantity and value of butter imported into Victoria, duty paid, for similar period? </para>
</item>
<item label="2.">
<para>What is the total (a) quantity and value of butter imported in bond into New South Wales for the year ending 30th June, 1923; (b) quantity and value of butter imported into New South Wales, duty paid, for same fear? </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">I am now in a position to furnish the honorable member with the following information : - 1. (a) 1,177,922 lbs., £92,538; 1 (b) 1,135,346 lbs., £63,604. 2. (a) Nil, nil; 2 (b) 788,926 lbs., £66,584. </para>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>LAND TAX ASSESSMENT BILL</title>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<type>bill</type>
</debateinfo>
<para class="block">Motion (by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Groom)</inline> proposed - </para>
<quote>
<para class="block">That hehave leave to bring in a Bill for an Act to amend section 29 of the. Land Tax As sessment Act 1910-1916. </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4Q</name.id>
<electorate>Yarra</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLIN, James Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLIN</name>
</talker>
<para>.- This motion has been moved without any explanation, though it deals with one of the most important questions that has ever come before this Parliament. In ordinary courtesy, the Government, when asking for leave to introduce a Bill, should tell us what the Bill is about. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFK</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GROOM, Littleton</name>
<name role="display">Mr Groom</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member knows that that is never done. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4Q</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLIN, James Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am going to oppose this Bill at every stage. It contains a most outrageous proposal. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KHG</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HILL, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr Hill</name>
</talker>
<para>- I thought you did not know what the Bill was about! </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4Q</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLIN, James Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I found a reference to this Bill in the Budget speech. The motion asks for leave to introduce a Bill to amend section 29 of the Land Tax Act. That section refers to the taxation of Crown leaseholds, and the Budget speech, as I have indicated, tells us what is the meaning of this proposal. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0A</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GABB, Joel</name>
<name role="display">Mr Gabb</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Government are looking after their friends. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4Q</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLIN, James Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLIN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Precisely. In his Budget speech, the Treasurer <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr. Earle Page)</inline> told us that the Government had decided to submit a Bill to abolish the tax on Crown leaseholds, and to make the repeal operative from the 1st July, 1917. During all these years, there has been a breach of an Act of Parliament, and now the Government propose retrospective legislation to legalize the illegality. There are two principles involved in the Bill. It proposes that all taxation now due on account of Crown leaseholds shall be foregone; and, secondly, there is to be no further taxation of these leaseholds. The amount of money at stake is anything from £1,250,000 to £2,000,000. This is the sort of legislation that the Government can introduce to benefit large land-holders, some of whom are probably absentees. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYV</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RILEY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr E RILEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- No wonder the AttorneyGeneral made no explanation. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>2602</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4Q</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>