/
19271104_reps_10_116.xml
3888 lines (3887 loc) · 237 KB
/
19271104_reps_10_116.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1927-11-04</date>
<parliament.no>10</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>3</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">House of Representatives. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1927-11-04</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker</inline>
<inline font-weight="bold">(Hon. Sir</inline>Littleton Groom) took the chair at 11 a.m. and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>STATE DEBTS</title>
<page.no>979</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFE</name.id>
<electorate>SWAN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GREGORY, Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr GREGORY</name>
</talker>
<para>- On the 29th September the Treasurer gave me certain figures in reply to a question as to the indebtedness of the States at the end of the financial year 1926-27 and the average interest payable by the States at the present time. Will the honorable gentleman supply as soon as possible the whole of the information asked for? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>C7E</name.id>
<electorate>COWPER, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Treasurer</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PAGE, Earle</name>
<name role="display">Dr EARLE PAGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is not possible yet to inform the honorable member the total indebtedness of the States to the 30th June, 1927 ; but, as soon as the information is available, I shall give it to him. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>BUDGET DEBATE</title>
<page.no>979</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLY</name.id>
<electorate>BOURKE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANSTEY, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr ANSTEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- When will honorable members have an opportunity of discussing the budget? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>C7E</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>CP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PAGE, Earle</name>
<name role="display">Dr EARLE PAGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- At an early date. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLY</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANSTEY, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr ANSTEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- When ? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>C7E</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PAGE, Earle</name>
<name role="display">Dr EARLE PAGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Next week or the following week. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ALLOWANCE POSTMASTEES</title>
<page.no>979</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVU</name.id>
<electorate>NEW ENGLAND, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THOMPSON, Victor</name>
<name role="display">Mr THOMPSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- When will payment of the extra remuneration promised to allowance postmasters be commenced, and on what basis will it be made? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KAY</name.id>
<electorate>CORANGAMITE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>CP</party>
<role>Postmaster-General</role>
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GIBSON, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr GIBSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- It will be paid from the 1st January of this year, but I can give no information at the moment as to the basis of payment. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CONTEOL OF WIRELESS</title>
<page.no>979</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYV</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RILEY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr E RILEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- When is the House likely to know the decision of the Government regarding the control of wireless? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>979</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Minister for External Affairs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I hope to make a statement on that matter next week, or at the latest during the following week. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>LEATHER</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KZA</name.id>
<electorate>EAST SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WEST, John Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr WEST</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Minister for Trade and Customs yet able to furnish a reply to the question I asked earlier regarding a probable increase in the price of leather? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1J</name.id>
<electorate>MARTIN, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRATTEN, Herbert</name>
<name role="display">Mr PRATTEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member's question was referred for inquiry, but the information he desired has not yet come to hand. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIES</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JPV</name.id>
<electorate>DARLING, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BLAKELEY, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr BLAKELEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister for Trade and Customs whether it is the intention of the Government to afford to honorable members before the Christmas vacation an opportunity to discuss the position of certain industries, particularly the iron and steel and textile industries? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1J</name.id>
<electorate>MARTIN, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRATTEN, Herbert</name>
<name role="display">Mr PRATTEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Statements of Government policy cannot be made by answers to questions. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>H.M.A.S. ADELAIDE</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Despatch to thesolomons. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMU</name.id>
<electorate>WENTWORTH, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MARKS, Walter</name>
<name role="display">Mr MARKS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Owing to the publicity given to the despatch of H.M.A.S. <inline font-style="italic">Adelaide</inline> to the Solomons, and to the somewhat unenviable position that has been created by the impression that the Australian naval forces do not desire to give assistance if that should be necessary, and sought, I ask whether, in the event of an urgent call coming from the interior of Malaita for armed assistance from the crew of H.M.A.S. <inline font-style="italic">Adelaide,</inline> the commander and his subordinates have authority to give that assistance, or have they first to obtain the sanction of the Government? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>-I am certain that the people of Australia do notentertain the belief that the personnel of the Australian navy is not prepared to respond to any call for assistance when the lives of British sub jects are in danger. As to thelatter portion of the question, I am unable to say what would happen in problematical circumstances. The commander of H.M.A.S. <inline font-style="italic">Adelaide</inline> has authority, without first securing the approval of the Commonwealth Government, to use the personnel of his ship to safeguard lives that may be in actual danger.The authority applies only when there is immediate and urgent danger. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>STEAMER COLLISION IN PORT JACKSON</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JZK</name.id>
<electorate>REID, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">COLEMAN, Percy</name>
<name role="display">Mr COLEMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is it a fact that the royal mail steamer <inline font-style="italic">Tahiti,</inline> after the deplorable collision that occurred last night, was allowed to proceed on her voyage to San Francisco without any statement being taken from the captain and officers as to the cause of the collision? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K1J</name.id>
<electorate>MARTIN, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PRATTEN, Herbert</name>
<name role="display">Mr PRATTEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am sure that every honorable member deplores the dreadful accident that occurred yesterday afternoon in Sydney. I have no definite information upon the subject, but I shall endeavour to get into telephonic communication with Sydney to-day, and I shall, on the adjournment motion, give to honorable members whatever information I may obtain. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PRODUCTION OFRADIUM</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KIR</name.id>
<electorate>BENDIGO, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HURRY, Geoffry</name>
<name role="display">Mr HURRY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have received a telegram from a company which is producing radium in Australia. In view of the proposal of the Government to purchase radium as outlinedin the budget, I ask the Minister if such purchase has been made and whether inquiries were insituated as to the possibility of purchase of the radium in Australia? . </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KI7</name.id>
<electorate>CALARE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Honorary Minister</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOWSE, Neville</name>
<name role="display">Sir NEVILLE HOWSE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Ten grammes of radium have already been purchased, at a cost of a little over £100,000. Before the purchase, full inquiries were made with regard to the countries that could supply the radium. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CANBERRA</title>
<page.no>980</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Meteorological Information - Transport</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>980</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMS</name.id>
<electorate>MACQUARIE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MANNING, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr MANNING</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the fact that the weather reports are posted in Sydney, Melbourne, and other capitals of the Commonwealth between 11 a.m. and 12 noon each morning and are not available in Canberra until the afternoon, will the Minister concerned take steps to see that such reports are telegraphed to Canberra immediately they are made available in the other capital cities ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMW</name.id>
<electorate>PARKES, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>NAT</party>
<role>Minister of Home and Territories</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MARR, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr MARR</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall consult the PostmasterGeneral and see if that is practicable. If so, it will be done. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVU</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THOMPSON, Victor</name>
<name role="display">Mr THOMPSON</name>
</talker>
<para>- As many honorable members have to walk from the Hotel Kurrajong to Parliament House, and that journey is a very disagreeable one when the weather is inclement, will the Minister for Home and Territories communicate with the Federal Capital Commission, asking it to expedite the construction of a tarred or concrete footpath between the two buildings? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMW</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MARR, Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr MARR</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member is aware that the Commission is doing all chat is possible to make satisfactory footpaths and roads. A concrete footpath will be laid down in the near future between Parliament House and the Hotel Kurrajong. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>MR. AMERY'S VISIT</title>
<page.no>981</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Address to Members of Parliament</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSC</name.id>
<electorate>BATMAN, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRENNAN, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRENNAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Referring to the address delivered to this Parliament last evening by the Dominions Secretary - with whose welcome I am sure we all wish to associate ourselves - when apparently, the press and the public were excluded from this building, is it the desire of the Prime Minister and the Government that the elaborate and able statement of Conservative policy made by the Dominions Secretary shall be the subject of criticism by honorable members here or elsewhere, or is it expected that the speech of the distinguished visitor shall pass without comment, as if accepted by every member of this House ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I think that all honorable members understand the position to be that it was felt desirable that an opportunity should be given for the Secretary of State for the Dominions to address the members of this Parliament, and for honorable members to ask him any questions they might desire upon matters of general imperial interest. It was not assumed that every honorable member would agree with everything that was said, or that in the absence of debate it might be considered that the Opposition or the Government acquiesced in every statement that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Amery</inline> had made. The desire was merely to have made available to honorable members as much information as possible. Many of the matters referred to last evening will be debated in tin's House, and upon the public platform, and varying and opposite views will he expressed upon them; but in such discussions some of the statements made last evening could not be repeated, as they were confidential, and it would be undesirable to give publicity to them. The discretion of honorable members individually as to what reference they make to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Amery's</inline> speech is, I am sure, tobe relied on. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEV</name.id>
<electorate>MARIBYRNONG, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FENTON, James</name>
<name role="display">Mr FENTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- A verbatim report of the speech was taken last night, and I desire to know what kind of censorship will be exercised in regard to it. Is the report to be printed and distributed among honorable members for their further information ? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- A typewritten copy of the reporthas been made, and it will be carefully revised, consideration being given to the advisability of making it public, either in a censored or uncensored form. Of course, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Amery</inline> himself must have an opportunity of seeing the report before any decision is made regarding its publication. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KX9</name.id>
<electorate>NEWCASTLE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WATKINS, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr WATKINS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Seeing that the official reporters were employed last evening, I ask you, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker,</inline> for what purpose was the report taken, if not to benefit honorable members. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFK</name.id>
<electorate>DARLING DOWNS, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GROOM, Littleton</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER (Hon Sir Littleton Groom</name>
</talker>
<para>- The gathering last night was not a sitting of the House, and as Speaker I have no control over the publication of its proceedings. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Amery's</inline> speech was reported so that, it could be published, should that be thought advisable, and with my permission, the <inline font-style="italic">Hansard</inline> staff was employed. A similar procedure was followed when the Empire Parliamentary Delegation visited Australia last year. During the visit several meetings of the Association were held. In some cases the reports of the speeches were treated as absolutely confidential, and were not circulated, whilst others were circulated after revision. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>981</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KX9</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WATKINS, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr WATKINS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the members of the Empire Parliamentary Association have the benefit of the report? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I think that is a matter for the Prime Minister in consultation with the Secretary of State for the Dominions to determine. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRENNAN, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRENNAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Doesthe Prime Minister consider it to be in accordance with the democratic outlook of the Australian people that we should be expected to listen here for two hours to an exposition of Conservative party policy without having an opportunity to reply? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I think that the honorable member must be nearly alone in his objection to the procedure of last evening. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>Honorable Members of the Opposition. - No. </para>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KEV</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FENTON, James</name>
<name role="display">Mr FENTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- We on this side are no believers in secret diplomacy. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The meeting last night was held to give an opportunity to honorable members of getting the fullest possible information on Empire affairs. The suggestion has been made that there was something undemocratic in the proceedings, and that they were in accordance with the methodsof secret diplomacy. May I inform honorable members that when in Great Britain last year I, as a Dominion Prime Minister, was entertained by, and addressed, the British Parliamentary Labour party. The statement I made at the gathering was of a private and confidential character, and no publicity of any sort was given to it. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KMS</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MANNING, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr MANNING</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is it not a fact that when the Prime Minister was in England the parent branch of the Empire Parliamentary Association invited him to address members; that at the gathering, which was representative of all parties in the Imperial Parliament, a member of the British Parliamentary Labour party presided; and that, although all present may not have agreed with what the right honorable gentleman said, they received the statement of his views appreciatively and courteously? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- At the meeting of the Empire Parliamentary Association my views were received without dissent, which may have been the expression of the innate courtesy of British Parliamentarians to a visitor. Thegathering was presided over by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Thomas,</inline> a Labour member, and a former Secretary of State for the Dominions. In addition. I attended the other gathering to which I have referred, which was composed solely of members of the Labour party. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRENNAN, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRENNAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I desire to make a personal explanation. The Prime Minister did me an in justice when he said that I was alone in the attitude I adopted towards the speech delivered in this chamber last evening by the Secretary of State for the Dominions. The interjections of honorable members were a sufficient refutation of the assertion. I yield to none in the cordiality of my personal welcome to our distinguished visitor. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYV</name.id>
<electorate>SOUTH SYDNEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RILEY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr E RILEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- We are all agreed as to his being welcome. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRENNAN, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRENNAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I did not, however, attend to hear our visitor on the understanding that any communication he might make to us would be of a confidential character. If I had been invited upon such a condition, I should have promptly and respectfully declined to take any part in a secret meeting of such a description. In order that there may be no misunderstanding in future, I say now that, having heard the representative of the Conservative Government now in power in Great Britain speak on a great variety of questions of foreign and Empire policy, I feel it my duty and responsibility to exercise my own discretion as. to what reference I shall make to those subjects, and the views on them expressed by him. My present intention is to make <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Amery's</inline> remarks the subject of further communication to my constituents in the freest possible way, believing that this and every other country has suffered a great deal too much in the past from secret, hole-and-corner methods, in connexion with foreign policy. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>982</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFS</name.id>
<electorate>HENTY, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GULLETT, Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr GULLETT</name>
</talker>
<para>- In reference to the personal explanation made by the honorable member for Batman <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Brennan),</inline> I ask you, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker,</inline> whether it is not a fact that, although, when we were invited to this chamber last night to listen to <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Amery,</inline> we were not definitely told that his communications were to be treated as confidential, the right honorable gentleman did, several times during his address, make it clear that his remarks were tobe confined within the four walls of the chamber? If that was so, was it not open to any honorable member who did not wish to listen upon those terms to retire from the meeting? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>983</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Honorable members know the nature of last night's proceedings. I cannot disclose what took place. It must be left to the judgment of those who heard what <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Amery</inline> said as to what they will say. I presume they will be influenced by those standards which usually guide members of a House with the high traditions which we possess. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>983</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH LINE OF STEAMERS</title>
<page.no>983</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>983</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXA</name.id>
<electorate>HUNTER, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHARLTON, Matthew</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHARLTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The following statement appeared yesterday in the Sydney press: - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>The Federal Cabinet has definitely decided to dispose of the Commonwealth Line. Its policy' was endorsed to-day at a joint meeting of the members of the Nationalists and Country Party, held at Parliament House. When members of the Nationalists and Country Party assembled to-day, they joined forces sit the suggestion of their leaders, and were addressed at length by the Prime Minister. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bruce</inline> made it clear that he was of the opinion that it should not be continued as a Government activity in view of the heavy financial losses .that are occurring on the running of the ships under the stringent conditions prescribed by the Australian Navigation Act. He favored selling the Line. This view, he stated, was shared by other members of the Cabinet. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">As that is a very important announcement, and has received great publicity, will the Prime Minister be good enough to say whether it is the intention of the Government definitely to dispose of the Line? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>983</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>NAT</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have no concern with press reports of alleged happenings at Cabinet or party meetings. The honorable member is aware that there is on the business paper a notice of motion referring to the report of the Joint Committee of Public Accounts on the Australian Commonwealth Line of Steamers. I have already intimated that honorable members will be given every opportunity to discuss that report, and that in connexion with it I shall make a perfectly clear and definite statement of the Government's policy with regard to the Line. That opportunity will be given either next week or the following week. Obviously I cannot make any statement of policy merely in answer to a question. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>983</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JXA</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHARLTON, Matthew</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHARLTON</name>
</talker>
<para>- The right honorable gentleman stated that he ca111101 make a definite statement on the subject to the House, but I would remind him that the broadcasting of these reports in the press must do the Australian Commonwealth Line of Steamers an immense amount of injury, as intending shippers cannot be expected to reserve cargo space when uncertainty exists as to the continuance of the operations of the Line. I urge the Prime Minister to make a definite pronouncement at once, so that the people of Australia may know precisely what the intention of the Government is. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>983</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4B</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRUCE, Stanley</name>
<name role="display">Mr BRUCE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Statements appear in the newspapers from time to time which express only the opinions of the writers as to the future action of the Government, and obviously a reply to every such statement reported is not to be expected. I suggest that it is unlikely that during the next three or four, or at most eight days, the Commonwealth Line of Steamers will be detrimentally affected by the reports referred to. Precisely similar reports have been current during the last three years. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>983</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KYX</name.id>
<electorate>COOK, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP; FLP from 1931</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RILEY, Edward Charles</name>
<name role="display">Mr C RILEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- In view of the fact that the Joint Committee of Public Accounts conducted its inquiry in connexion with the Commonwealth Line of Steamers <inline font-style="italic">in camera,</inline> will the Prime Minister make available to honorable members copies of the confidential cablegrams that have passed between the London office and the head office of the Line in Sydney, regarding increases in freights? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>983</page.no>