/
19280301_reps_10_117.xml
4297 lines (4297 loc) · 372 KB
/
19280301_reps_10_117.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1928-03-01</date>
<parliament.no>10</parliament.no>
<session.no>1</session.no>
<period.no>3</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>3470</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">House of Representatives. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1928-03-01</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr.</inline>Speaker <inline font-weight="bold">(Hon. Sir Littleton Groom)</inline> took the chair at 2.30 p.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>MOTION OF CENSURE</title>
<page.no>3470</page.no>
<type>motion of censure</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Debate resumed from 29thFebruary <inline font-style="italic">{vide</inline> page 3469) on motion by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Charlton</inline> - </para>
<quote>
<para>That, in the opinion of this House, the Government is deserving of severe censure for its failure to adequately protect Australian industries and to limit migration to the nation's ability to absorb new arrivals, together with its neglect to formulate proposals to deal with unemployment. </para>
</quote>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3470</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K4Y</name.id>
<electorate>Herbert</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NOTT, Lewis</name>
<name role="display">Dr NOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>.- When the House adjourned last night I was discussing migration and particularly the influx of Europeans. The majority of foreign migrants to Australia in recent years have been Italians, and I sought last night dispassionately and impartially to do justice to those migrants and to defend them against the extravagant charges that have been made from time to time in the press by politicians and other public men, mainly for political propaganda purposes. I pointed out that in 1926 approximately 3,000 Italians entered the Commonwealth, and I proved conclusively that that influx was not a menace to the predominance of British character in our population. Immigration at the existing rate cannot change the character of our population. My reasons for choosing the year 1926 was because at that time the Labour party was in power in five of the six stales of the Commonwealth. How did those foreigners come to Australia? The suggestion has been made on many occasions that some secret arrangement exists between our Prime Minister <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Bruce)</inline> and Signor Mussolini, the dictator of </para>
</talk.start>
<para class="block">Italy.That suggestion is fatuous to a degree and worthy of the source from which it emanates. The conditions under which Italians are able to enter the Commonwealth are, or should be, known to every honorable member, but in order to refute the charge that the Government is actively importing foreigners, and to educate those of the public who might be misled by statements of this kind, ' I shall briefly relate the facts. To any one who has studied thesubject it is clear that the migration of Italians is a ' world-wide movement. While immigration to theUnited States of America was more or less unrestricted, Italians flocked into that country at the rate of hundreds of thousands a year. The migratory impulse in them was so strong, largely because of the economic conditions in their homeland, that when the application of the quota practically closed the doors of America to them they sought other fields in which to settle and labour, and naturally began to give increased attention to Australia. In my electorate are many Italians, and it is a remarkable fact that for some obscure reason this race has shown a predilection ' for the sugar industry in all parts of the world. Men from Italy are to be found working in large numbers in Kenya Colony, Damaraland, Manilla, and other parts of the Philippine Islands, and Cuba. Those who are in Australia came of their own volition and complied with the requirements of our immigration law. The majority were fired with the ambition to become landed proprietors, and being hard working, frugal, and thrifty, a very large percentage of them realized, that aspiration. The others continue as labourers in the sugar fields, but it is significent that they are welcomed into the ranks of the Australian Workers' Union, and that the Labour Government in Queensland' has never exercised its power to prevent these foreigners from gaining a livelihood in this industry. On the Queensland statute-book Is " an Act to prohibit the employment of certain forms of labour in the production of sugar . and for other incidental purposes " and for the information of honorable members I quote from it the following provisions : - </para>
<quote>
<para>The expression " Certificate of having passed the dictation test," means a certificate under the hand of a State officer, authorized for that purpose by the Secretary for Agriculture, that, when the said officer has dictated to the person concerned not less than , 50 words in such language as the Secretary for Agriculture may direct, such person has correctly written them out in that language in the presence of the said officer. </para>
</quote>
<para>The expression " Occupier " includes owner in fee simple or for any less estate and lessee for life or for any term of years or at will, and whether on the share system, or otherwise, and any occupier under any form of tenancy or agreement whatever, whether express or implied, with the owner of the land. </para>
<para>The expressions "Employer" and "Employee " have the same meanings as arc respectively assigned to them by " The Industrial Peace Act of 1912." </para>
<para>After the passing of this act, it shall be unlawful for any person whohas not first obtained in the prescribed manner a certificate of having passed the dictation test to engage in or carry on the cultivation of sugar-cane upon any land within Queensland of which such person, whether individually or in partnership or association with others, is the occupier. </para>
<para>Any such person who acts in contravention of this section shall be liable to a penalty not exceeding One hundred pounds, and the crop of sugar-cane so being cultivated shall be liable to be forfeited to His Majesty by order of the Court before which the offence is proved. </para>
<para>After the passing oi this act- </para>
<list type="lowerroman">
<item label="(i)">
<para>Any employer who, either directly or indirectly or under any pretence or device, attempts to employ, or employs or authorizes or permits to bc employed, in or in connexion with the industry of the cultivation of sugar-cane and the manufacture therefrom of sugar, any person who has not first obtained a certificate of having passed the dictation test; </para>
</item>
<item label="(ii)">
<para>Any person who has not first obtained a certificate of having passed the dictation test who is employed in or in connexion with such industry: shall be guilty of an offence. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para class="block">The Queensland Labour Government has the power to restrict and even to prohibit foreigners of any nationality from occupying land in Queensland for the cultivation of sugar; but it has not used it. From time to time it has stated for pro paganda purposes by members . -of the Opposition that, the sugar industry of Queensland is passing into the hands of Italians, and that this is against the best interests of the" people whom it pretends to represent and for whose welfare we are told it has the highest regard. If that is so why does the Queensland Labour party not use the power which it has to prevent such an alleged calamity? Members' of the Australian Workers </para>
<para class="block">Union have also frequently asserted that Italians are a menace to the advancement of Australian industry; but the Queensland Government, which relies upon the Australian Workers' Union for its existence, has never sought toprevent or limit the influx of Italians into the Queensland sugar areas or their acquirement of sugar growing properties. There is a good deal of humbug and hypocrisy in the efforts that are being made to saddle the Commonwealth Government with responsibility for the influx of foreigners into Australia. The statement that these people are a pressing and urgent menace to our economic welfare is neither more nor less than a myth which carries the approval of the Australian Workers' Union, and is encouraged and fostered by State Labour Governments in an insane desire to saddle the Commonwealth Government with a responsibility that in the light of facts it cannot be expected to accept. </para>
<para>I wish now to discuss a little further and briefly the subject of British migration to Australia. In 1926 the Commonwealth received 37,000 British migrants. But did this Government do any canvassing to obtain them? Every honorable member knows very well that it did nothing of the kind, for 98 per cent, of them were nominated by persons already in Australia, or were assisted to come here by some authority other than the Commonwealth Government. Honorable members opposite would have acted more honestly had they made this clear in the course of their speeches. Every one who has any knowledge of the subject is aware that the States are responsible for the requisitioning of nominated and assisted migrants. Labour Governments, which controlled the affairs of five out of the six States during the year of which I have been speaking, must bear the responsibility of having brought the migrants here.' It is well that statements of this kind should be made . in reply to the loose and childish charges respecting migration which honorable members, opposite frequently lay at . the door of this Government. </para>
<para>I believe in preference to British migrants, just as I believe in preference to returned, soldiers, and for that reason 1 am glad that the Commonwealth has entered into an agreement with the British Government for the expenditure of £34,000,000 over a period of years on the development of Australia, with the object of encouraging British migration to our shores. No one could honestly say, after studying the record of this Government, that it has not made a genuine and generous endeavour to increase our population from British stock. </para>
<para>Sneers have been cast at the Government because it has appointed a number of commissions, and, particularly the Development and Migration Commission, to investigate various problems of development which await solution in Australia; but for my part I agree with its policy in this regard. It has happened too often in our political history that illconceived and half-baked developmental schemes have been put into operation, only to stand as many do today, as colossal monuments to the stupidity of those who initiated them. No government nor statesman in Australia has a sufficiently wide knowledge of our conditions to undertake, without expert assistance, the solution of the many problems which face us here. In . ray opinion the Government has shown sagacity and prudence in appointing commissions composed of experts to make inquiries into these matters. Though honorable members opposite consider such action an extravagant waste of public money, I believe that the adoption of the policy will prevent us from adding to the already large number of monuments that we have to the insane desire of certain persons to gain political capital by involving the country in what are really, though sometimes not apparently, ill-considered national undertakings. The Burnett River scheme in Queensland should, in my opinion, have been thoroughly investigated before it was emburked upon ; but it was hurriedly undertaken without proper consideration, and success is therefore not likely to result from it, though possibly it might have been profitably conducted. Because the Development and Migration Commission, which the Commonwealth Government appointed to advise it in allocating the money available under the migration agreement, has not seen fit to approve of that scheme, it has been roundly abused in certain quarters. This is not as it should be. I shall be quite ready to justify on the public platforms of this country the action of the Government in appointing commissions of this character. </para>
<para>The subject of tariff protection for our industries has been discussed at some length during this debate. I congratulate the Minister for Trade and Customs <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Pratten)</inline> upon the success of his administration of his difficult department. I believe that every fair-minded member on this side of the chamber, or the other, will agree with me that the Minister has discharged his onerous duties with marked credit to himself and with advantage to the country. He has taken every possible step to make himself cognizant of the requirements of our industries, and is undoubtedly imbued with the desire to stimulate both primary and secondary development here. On various occasions when tariff schedules have been under our consideration, honorable members opposite have been most fulsome in adulations of his administration. This has been so particularly when they have been desirous of gaining favour with certain interests in their constituencies. As suggested, by the honorable member for Hume <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr.. Parker Moloney)</inline> there are honorable members on both sides of the House who differ in their fiscal views. There are those who believe in freetrade, others who subscribe to one form of protection or another, and some who would go so far as to advocate a complete embargo on the importation of foreign goods. Personally I support the Government's protective policy. Although I admire the constancy of the honorable member for Swan <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Gregory)</inline> he is, as I have said before, out of date, and like the platypus an interesting link with the past. The honorable member, however, is consistent. I have always explained my position on fiscal .questions without doubt or ambiguity, lt is, imperative, that, so far as is possible, we should produce in this country everything which we need to meet our requirements in every sphere of activity. I have gone further and said that we should produce the necessaries of life, which are at present coming from foreign countries, particularly from Oriental countries, where work is done under sweated labour conditions; that we should do this., even if it were necessary to impose an embargo on the importation of such commodities. In such cases there should be no objection to the Government imposing an almost prohibitive tariff to encourage local production. Although such a policy . is freely criticized by the freetrader, it is essential to the progress and welfare of the people of Australia. The Prime Minister recently announced the renewal of the sugar agreement for a further period of three years. This has met with bitter and open hostility from certain individuals who are illinformed concerning the possibilities of the Australian sugar industry. Such persons have never troubled to investigate the subject of sugar production in all its ramifications, and do not know that within the next two years Great Britain will be in the chains of economic bondage to the ring which controls the sugar markets of the world. . This will lead to starvation prices, which will not be exceeded by those which were charged in Great Britain during the war when Britain was tied to the European beet producers. It is wise, ' therefore, to give our sugar industry an opportunity to expand and to supply the Empire with a commodity which is vital to its existence. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3473</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFE</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GREGORY, Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr Gregory</name>
</talker>
<para>-The . honorable member must not forget peanuts. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<para>Dr.NOTT.- The honorable member for Swan should advocate the production of peanuts in "Western Australia. If he did that he would, I am sure, receive the thanks of the people in that State. We are a primary producing nation, and up to the present have not been able to develop our secondary industries owing to various factors with which I shall deal in a few moments. Our primary industries provide a wide field for employment at lucrative rates during certain periods of the year ; but unfortunately when the harvest is over there is a considerable amount of unemployment, and in the secondary industries employment is largely dependent upon an effective protective tariff. That has been mentioned by honorable members on both sides of the chamber. The present unemployment difficulty is, as has been admitted by every one who has considered the subject, due to the fact that our secondary industries are not developing at a rate sufficiently rapid to absorb the unemployed during slack periods in primary production. </para>
<para>We have had an enormous amount of " sob stuff " from honorable members opposite about unemployment. The honorable member for Dalley <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Theodore)</inline> in referring to the subject - he has been responsible for more- unemployment in Queensland than any one else - tried to convince the House that the Prime Minister said that there was practically no unemployment in Australia. The Prime Mininter did not say anything of the kind, and the honorable member for Dalley. knows it. The right honorable gentleman gave certain figures, which were verified by the Minister for Trade and Customs <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Pratten)</inline> before- he resumed his seat. I can say without fear of contradiction that one of the greatest contributing factors to the unemployment which we have in our midst to-day is. the financial. orgies of certain Labour governments in the various States which have gone in for an unprecedented squandering of public money. I shall quote the honorable member for Dalley, because he has a certain reputation in. Queensland for saying wise things, and an unfortunate notoriety for doing foolish" things. The honorable member said on one occasion that they had imposed taxation practically to the limit in ' Queensland, and that he would combat the introduction . of a 44-hour week, which to his credit, he did. He fought the principle to the last ditch; but subsequently he had to accept the principle as one that would bring about the millenium in industrial affairs. After eight years of maladministration by Labour governments of which he was the head, or a leading Minister, taxation had been imposed to, the limit ! Would any one invest money or establish new industries in a State where taxation has reached saturation point? We cannot in such circumstances expect persons to erect factories, establish industries, and thus provide avenues of employment. During his dissertation on unemployment the honorable member pitched a harrowing tale, and gave to the House a series of explanations why men were unemployed. He should know-: he is a specialist in the causation of unemployment, as his record in Queensland indicates. I was particularly gratified to hear him say at this period of his political career that he thinks that men who are not members of a union have the same right to a living as have unionists. That is one of the wise things the honorable member sometimes says. I hope that when put to the test he will not as usual swallow his words concerning those who are outside the pale of unionism; but will see to it that they have an opportunity to earn a living at all times. At this critical time, when «election ballots are taking place, honorable members opposite do not like to hear one of their own party advocating that the non-unionist should have the same right to earn his living and daily bread as has the unionist. I, for one, congratulate the honorable member for Dalley on his sane attitude. The honorable member for Gwydir <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Abbott)</inline> gave pertinent instances of the victimization of non-unionists - on these examples I need not dilate. "We have heard from honorable members opposite - a great deal about the failure of this Government to develop industry, yet the honorable member for Dalley is so keen to foster development in Australia and to find employment for our workers that he has gone out of his way to become a director of an American firm which is importing goods into this country. We have heard much about the pernicious influence which is being exerted by certain interests in. Flinders-lane on this Government, whose policy, the Labour party contends, has been detrimental to the best interests of the workers.- Yet the honorable member for Dalley has become a director of an American firm importing into Australia a considerable amount of material that is competing with the soft timbers of Queensland, for the protection of which this Parliament recently increased the tariff. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVS</name.id>
<electorate>DALLEY, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THEODORE, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr THEODORE</name>
</talker>
<para>- To what firm is the honorable member referring? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K4Y</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NOTT, Lewis</name>
<name role="display">Dr NOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Celotex Company. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVS</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THEODORE, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr Theodore</name>
</talker>
<para>- -I wish to -correct a misstatement that has been made by the honorable member for -Herbert I assure you, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker,</inline> and- the honorable- member, also, that I am not and never have been a director of the Celotex Company. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFK</name.id>
<electorate>DARLING DOWNS, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GROOM, Littleton</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER (Hon Sir Littleton Groom</name>
</talker>
<para>- This is not a point of order; but the honorable member is entitled to make a personal explanation. That is usually done at the close of the speech, though sometimes it is allowed at the time the statement is made. However, I ain sure that, as he has given his assurance that he is not a director of the Celotex Company, it' will be accepted by the honorable member for Herbert. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K4Y</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NOTT, Lewis</name>
<name role="display">Dr NOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- I willingly accept the assurance given by the honorable member for Dalley. By way of explanation, I should like to say that about three weeks ago, when in Sydney in company wilh the Director of the Queensland Intelligence Bureau and Other gentlemen, I met the secretary of the Celotex Company, and he definitely told me that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Theodore</inline> and <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. William</inline> Morris Hughes were directors of the company. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVS</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THEODORE, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr THEODORE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Does not the honorable member accept my statement? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K4Y</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NOTT, Lewis</name>
<name role="display">Dr NOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- Certainly. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVS</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THEODORE, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr THEODORE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Then why repeat a misstatement ? </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3474</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K4Y</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">NOTT, Lewis</name>
<name role="display">Dr NOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>-- I merely wish to indicate to the honorable member that the information came to me from what I took to be a reliable source. I have with me an extract from the <inline font-style="italic">Sydney Morning Herald</inline> containing a statement by the honorable member for Dalley, which, as far as I know, has not yet been denied. In it he gives great credit to this Government for assisting in the development of Australia. The extract relates to the Roma Oil Corporation, and reads- </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<quote>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. E.</inline>
<inline font-style="italic">Gr.</inline>Theodore, M.P., a director, who seconded the motion for the adoption of the report, said that the Commonwealth had recommended against the utilising of the bore for gas production, since damage might be done to the producing qualities of the dome if the gas was drawn upon. The Government's advice was to carry out further prospecting and drilling,, at different sites and greater depths. The fact that the oil was so fine showed that it had' passed through some strata from a not far distant pool, and the oil was probably present in commercial quantities. " I believe that the discovery of mineral oil incommercial, quantities," said <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Theodore.</inline> " will be the greatest single factor that' could, be thought of in the" economic development of the Commonwealth." </para>
</quote>
<list type="upperalpha-dotted">
<item label="J.">
<para>agree entirely with, the sentiment expressed by the honorable member for Dalley, and it should be some consolation to the people of Australia to know that he whole-heartedly supports the policy of the Government in regard to the searching for oil. Just as the discovery of coal made Great Britain, and just as the discovery of petrol, which has largely supplanted coal, helped America, so we believe that the discovery of oil in Australia will help to make this country. This Government is deserving of much credit for assisting in the search for oil by the appointment of experts who practically occupy positions similar to those of the various commissioners who are now dealing with other phases of development in Australia. The Government is certainly to be congratulated for having adopted a farreaching and effective policy in connexion with the fostering of our industries, for what applies to the case of oil applies to the other industries which this Government continually tries to assist. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>I have no wish to unduly prolong the debate, but I must refer to the red herring that the honorable member for Reid has dragged across the trail by discussing during this debate the building of two Australian cruisers in Great Britain. The honorable member delved into history in a futile endeavour to explain what the Government should .do to foster industry. Honorable members opposite have contended, again and again, that the building of the two cruisers abroad has meant a great loss to the workers of Australia. If we search the records of Queensland during the administration of the honorable member for Dalley, we find that the honorable gentleman went abroad to obtain steel bridges, and that on other occasions machinery and locomotives were purchased abroad. The Balmain Federation of Boiler and Locomotive Makers passed a motion of protest against the action of the Queensland Government in placing orders for locomotives outside the Commonwealth, at a time when there was great unemployment in Queensland. </para>
<para>I strenuously oppose the censure motion. It deals mainly with immigration, the protective policy of the Government, and unemployment. Unfortunately for the Opposition, the people of Australia fully recognize that this Government is doing its best to give relief to the people, and to develop Australia along right lines. As an earnest of that, let me refer to the conference which is being convened by the Prime Minister in an endeavour to bring about industrial peace. I regret that, although among the Opposition, and in the circles of Labour generally there is a feeling that the conference should take place, it is possible that the paid agitator will bring his baneful influence to bear upon Labour members to prevent the holding of the conference. I hope that wise counsels will prevail, and that in the interests of the development and prosperity of Australia the conference will be held. If the delegates attending it confer in an atmosphere of good-will and fellowship, and with a desire to achieve the object in view, we shall go a long way towards overcoming those obstacles which,, surrounded and shrouded by misunderstanding and suspicion in the past, have provoked bitterness and strife among capital and labour, and employer and employee, with the dislocation of industry to the detriment of Australia as a whole. </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3475</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate>Capricornia</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>.- I have much pleasure in supporting the motion of censure submitted by the Leader of the Opposition - </para>
</talk.start>
<quote>
<para>That in the opinion of this House the Government is deserving of severe censure for its failure to adequately protect Australian industries and to limit migration to the nation's ability to absorb new arrivals, together with its neglect to formulate proposals to deal with unemployment. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">I was rather amazed at the speech of the honorable member for Herbert <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr. Nott). His</inline> vain effort to blame the Queensland Labour Government for the influx of Italians into that State was ludicrous. He referred to a measure on the statute-book of Queensland, entituled the Sugar Cultivation Act, which he knows quite well was introduced in accordance with a request of the Fisher Federal Government, that, when the Sugar Excise and Bounty Acts were repealed, the State Government should pass legislation to prohibit the employment . of coloured labour in the cane-fields of Queensland. The honorable member is well aware that it was not intended that the act should apply to a white race like the Italians. He also knows that if the Queensland Government applied the provisions of the Sugar Cultivation Act, which was intended to exclude coloured races to the Italians who came in with the approval of the Commonwealth Government, the Bruce-Page Ministry would be the first to protest. It would say that the State Government was acting unfairly, and was creating an international embarrassment that would probably lead to most serious trouble. The honorable member for Herbert knows better than anybody else that that is what would happen. If the Queensland Government applied the dictation test to the Italians coming in, he would probably be one of the first to object, and would ask the Federal Government to intervene. The honorable member also said that the Australian Workers' Union in Queensland accepts Italians as members. Naturally, when, the Italians find employment in the canefields, the union has no option but to admit them to membership. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L1T</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">YATES, George</name>
<name role="display">Mr Yates</name>
</talker>
<para>- It must do that, as a matter of self-preservation. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Obviously; otherwise a large number of men' would be employed in the industry for less than the award rate, and the Australian Workers' Union would be de-registered if it did not' admit them. Preference is granted to the members of the union in the sugar industry of Queensland, and what standing would the union have if it refused membership to the Italians employed in the canefields? I know Italians who are good members of the' union, and abide by its rules. If the union refused to accept them it would create a big industrial crisis, because there would probably be a cessation of work in the sugar fields, and resultant loss to thousands of growers in the honorable member's electorate. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4Q</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLIN, James Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr Scullin</name>
</talker>
<para>- The unions could not please honorable members opposite, whatever they did. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Of course not. The honorable member knows well that the only Government that could intervene to restrict the flow of Italian migrants is the Commonwealth Government. The State Ministries are not consulted with regard to the Italians coming to Australia. These men arrive by boat loads. Over 9,000 Italians entered the country in 1927, and they came with the approval of the Commonwealth Government. The Labour party is not opposed to the Italians as a race. We admit that they make good settlers,, and are useful workers. I recognize, too, that they are white men, and that their country is noted for its art, science and learning. Many of them have done good pioneering work in Queensland; but we say that it is unfair to them, and doubly unfair to the Australian workers who are pushed out of employment, when thousands of these unfortunate individuals, unfamiliar with our language and our local conditions, and without friends, are dumped down in Australia, and forced to live on the ration dole unless they succeed in pushing an Australian out of employment. Certain honorable members opposite have a definite object in view in seeking to encourage the migration of Italians who do not understand our arbitration laws and industrial conditions. These members hope to induce them to work for less than the award rate, and thus break down the conditions of employment operating in Australia. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L1T</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">YATES, George</name>
<name role="display">Mr Yates</name>
</talker>
<para>- We know that they do that. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yes. Every Australian should stand for preference to Australian workers. Unfortunately, there are certain employers who prefer to engage foreigners. I was told recently that in the Childers district numerous gangs of Southern Europeans had taken the place of good Australian workmen who had their homes in the neighbourhood of Childers and Bundaberg, and had spent their earnings in the district. The blame for all that must lie at the door pf the Commonwealth Government. When we protest against these things we are not taking exception to, the Italians as a race. We object to an indiscriminate flow of migrants from any country, if no provision is made to absorb them. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3476</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JMG</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ATKINSON, Llewelyn</name>
<name role="display">Mr Atkinson</name>
</talker>
<para>- Why call it indiscriminate migration, in view of the arrangement between the Commonwealth and the Italian Government? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- There is no arrangement. We are told that certain representations have been made to the Italian authorities. Our first duty, however, is to our own people, and to their relatives in Great Britain, who would make good Australians. The encouragement of an indiscriminate flow of migrants from Southern Europe, without provision being made to absorb them as settlers on the land, or in useful industries, is calculated to bring about discontent, bitterness, and probably industrial upheavals. If they could be absorbed I would welcome them. The honorable member for Herbert evidently thinks that he personally was responsible for winning the seat he holds in this House, and on every occasion he tries to besmirch the name of the honorable member for Dalley <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Theodore).</inline></para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JSC</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BRENNAN, Frank</name>
<name role="display">Mr Brennan</name>
</talker>
<para>- He thinks that he has a mission. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Apparently so. If he had better taste he would realize that his attitude is a paltry one, and the winning of the seat was due to the misrepresentation practised by the Nationalist party at the last election. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L07</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LAZZARINI, Hubert</name>
<name role="display">Mr Lazzarini</name>
</talker>
<para>- Inchcape won it. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yes, and the misrepresentations in connexion with the seamen's strike. A definite pledge was made by the Leader of the Government that if he were returned to power he would deport Walsh and Johnson. The Government and its supporters depicted those men as outrageous individuals, as bolsheviks of the wildest type. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L4X</name.id>
<electorate>HUME, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MOLONEY, Parker</name>
<name role="display">Mr PARKER MOLONEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Then they were compensated. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- After the election, instead of being deported they were compensated for the inconvenience they had suffered because of their detention. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L1T</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">YATES, George</name>
<name role="display">Mr Yates</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Government will not allow Jock Garden to leave Australia. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is so. At every opportunity they roundly condemn him ; but when' he evinced a desire' to visit China they would not grant him the necessary permission. They were afraid he might stay there and are keeping him handy for the next election, to hold him up as a bogey man, because they fear that. Walsh and Johnson may not then be in the picture. I feel sure that greater alacrity is not shown in the payment of any bill than was displayed by the Government in- connexion with the compensation of Walsh and Johnson for the inconvenience to which they were put so that a political " stunt " could be worked on the eve of the last election. It is no wonder that the honorable member for Henty <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Gullett)</inline> described the honorable member for Cowper <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr. Earle Page)</inline> as " the tragic Treasurer." This and similar bogies were the deciding factor in the victory of the Nationalist party in the electorate of Herbert. The seat was not won from Labour, because Nationalism had held it for eleven years. If we were to accept the statements of the honorable member for Herbert <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr. Nott)</inline> we should conclude that the honorable member for Dalley <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Theodore)</inline> had ruined Queensland, and had been responsible for an unpredecented amount of unemployment during his leadership of the Government of that State. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KXQ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PARKHILL, Robert</name>
<name role="display">Mr Parkhill</name>
</talker>
<para>- Many persons consider that he did. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member for Warringah was paid £1,000 a year to make statements of that character. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFK</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER (Hon Sir Littleton Groom</name>
</talker>
<para>- Order! The honorable member must confine his remarks to the motion. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- We are dealing with the very important subject of unemployment. The honorable member for Herbert has endeavoured to lay the blame on the shoulders of the honorable member for Dalley, when the real culprit is the present Federal Government. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVS</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THEODORE, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr Theodore</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member for Herbert is quite in order in attacking the honorable member for Dalley, but another honorable member is not in order in defending him! </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para />
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3477</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I do not want the Queensland Government to be blamed for any unemployment that may exist in that State, when Lt. has been caused in Australia to a much greater extent by the acts of omission and commission of this Government, its failure to protect Australian industries, and the absence of a constructive policy in relation to primary industries. The honorable member for Herbert alleged that the honorable member for Dalley, during his regime as Premier of Queensland, had caused that that State to retrogress. I point out that, instead of retrogressing during the ten years in which the honorable member for Dalley took a leading part in the Government of Queensland, the annual wealth production of that State increased from £51,000,000 to £85,000,000, and the output of manufactures increased from £25,000,000 to £38,000,000, while the other increases were as follow: - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<quote>
<para>Farm products from £6,700,000 to £12,200,000. </para>
<para>Dairy products from £3,899,000 to £6,678,000. </para>
<para>Pastoral industry from £18,800,000 to £22,000,000 (value). </para>
<para>Savings Bank deposits from £10,000,000 to £21,500,000. </para>
<para>Population from670,000 to 850,000 persons. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">There was less unemployment when the honorable member for Dalley vacated office than there had been in. any previous period in the history of Queensland. The workers, instead of being unemployed, were much better off financially. They banked their savings Avith such regularity that the deposits per head of population in the savings banks increased from £14 19s. 6d. to £24 19s.1d., and the assets of those banks increased from £25,000,000 to £59,900,000. Moreover, the gentleman who is now the honorable member for Dalley was the only Australian premier who introduced an unemployment insurance scheme under which workers who became unemployed receive a weekly payment, not by way of charity, but as a right. When this Government went on the hustings in the last Federal election campaign they deplored the existence of unemployment, and shed crocodile tears over the plight of the unemployed worker and his starving wife and children. They then promised that they would legislate for national insurance including a comprehensive unemployment- insurance scheme. What have they done? Nothing. Why? Because any legislation in that directionwould . strike a blow, at the profits of the Avealthy private insurance companies in Australia, who are the principal contributors to the fighting fund of the spurious political combination which occupies the benches opposite. I refer not to individuals, but to parties. If the honorable member for Herbert Avere to speak truly he would say that the honorable member for Dalley gave a lead to the rest of Australia when he secured the passage of humanitarian legislation designed to alleviate the distress that existed in the community; that he was responsible for bold statesmanlike schemes such as the great Northern Burnett irrigation scheme in my electorate. That is one of the finest schemes of its kind in Australia. It embraces an area of 4,000,000 acres, and received the unequivocal recommendation of' the honorable member for Henty Avhen that gentleman was Commonwealth Director of Migration. He was assisted by some of the mostcapable land experts in Australia, and had at his command all the data in the possession of the government departments of Queensland. Accompanied by experts he traversed the whole of the country involved, 'and recommended to the then Nationalist Common- wealth Government that the money necessary to inaugurate the scheme should be made available. That government turned down the recommendation because the proposal had emanated from a Labour Premier, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Theodore,</inline> The Labour government borrowed money abroad, and the work is being carried out. I have a very great respect for the honorable member for Henty because of the action which he then took. Because the Government would not accept his recommendation he resigned a position which carried with it a salary of £2,000 per annum. He recognized that a large number of persons would be attracted from the cities and, together with many newcomers to Australia, would obtain useful employment. The other day I had a conversation with a man Avho came from the Northern Burnett district. He informed me that the farmers there are among the most ' prosperous in Queensland to-day. The area in question is eminently suited to maize and cotton growing . and dairying operations. As a result of . the scheme three railway lines are nearing completion at Monto. They converge at that centre, which is in the heart of this great area. Thousands of men are making a good living Avhere formerly only a few wealthy pastoralists held land. As can be readily imagined, some of them, fought the scheme bitterly, and. supported the Nationalist party with the object of defeating the scheme. The honorable member for Herbert <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr.</inline></para>
<para class="block">Nott) put an entirely different complexion on the matter, but I have stated the facts. If I harbour one grievance more than another against this Government it relates to its dilly-dallying policy over the Northern Burnett scheme. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Gepp</inline> has had the scheme in hand for some considerable time, but up to the present no finality has been reached. There has been too much delay; and it is imperative , that this Government should arrive at an early decision and provide the necessary loan money in order that the scheme may be carried to fruition. It must be completed and a dam built across the Dawson river so that the necessary 1,250,000 acre feet of water may be conserved to supply the irrigable land in the neighbourhood which, unfortunately, is subject to periodical droughts. </para>
<para>I shall probably be asked to state what I would do to create employment. First I would grant an increased tariff to protect our languishing secondary industries. That tariff would be an effective one, and not just high enough to allow imports to come into Australia in increasing quantities; it would be sufficiently high to keep out of Australia those articles that can economically be made here. If I were Prime Minister I should endeavour to induce the British Government to grant a greater degree of tariff protection towards Australian products, particularly sugar, wine, and dried fruits. I should also send to New Zealand a responsible Minister to negotiate with the Government of that country with a view to establishing a tariff preference for Australian sugar, instead of their getting all their requirements from black labour Fiji. I trust that the Minister for Trade and Customs will deal with that subject when he arrives in New Zealand. Honorable members opposite talk a good deal about this phase of tariff preference, but they have done nothing 'to induce the New Zealand government to :grant a measure of preference to Australian sugar. I believe that the Premier of New Zealand <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Coates)</inline> is a sufficiently " big " statesman to take, according to his own words, " An Empire view " of the matter, and arrange for the purchase from Australia of at least 100,000 tons of sugar yearly. That would give considerable stability to one of the greatest employ ing. industries in Australia, which affords employment to 25,000 Australians, 4,000 or 5,000 of whom travel yearly from the Southern States to the sugar-fields of Queensland, and assist to create for the manufacturer in Sydney and Melbourne that most advantageous market, the home market. I should also take steps to build a national railway from the Northern Territory, across the Barkly Tableland, connecting up the three east- west railway systems in Queensland, and linking up with Bourke in New South Wales. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJM</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JACKSON, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr Jackson</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is not the linking up of those three railway systems a task for the Queensland Government ? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- As it is a national work, providing an outlet for the Northern Territory, it is primarily a Commonwealth job. It would establish communication between the Northern Territory and the big centres of population. The honorable member for Bass <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Jackson),</inline> who takes a keen interest in the Northern Territory, must admit that it is the duty of the Commonwealth Government to convene a conference representing the Governments of New South Wales, Queensland, and the Commonwealth in order to decide upon the conditions under which this great national railway should be built. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJM</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JACKSON, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr Jackson</name>
</talker>
<para>- I consider that the Commonwealth Government should control all our railways. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3479</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- I am glad to hear the views of the honorable member, but such a scheme is impossible when we have a Treasurer who advocates the selling of our shipping line, and would probably, if the Commonwealth owed all the railways, advocate the selling of them, too. The honorable gentleman would sell these public utilities to some of his big business friends, whose influence drove the honorable member for Wimmera <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Stewart)</inline> out of the Federal Ministry, simply because he was an active representative of the primary producers, and would not bend his knee at the dictate of the National Union. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>This Government should institute and develop a national forestry policy by establishing a Commonwealth' Forestry Department with control over all forests in Federal Territory, to stimulate and co-operate with State forestry departments. This Government should subsidize the' State Forestry Departments in order that additional areas of Australia might . be planted annually, the subsidies to be taken out of the £1,196,000 which is collected annually from the duties on imported timber. That scheme would give employment to many thousands. </para>
<para>The Commonwealth Government should also give effect to the desire of the Australian dairy-farmers that a stabilization scheme should be established in connexion with the marketing of dairy produce, based on the cost of production, the farmer to receive the cost of production plus a reasonable amount for the work he, his wife and family perform, and plus a reasonable return on. the capital invested. No one could cavil at that scheme. Other important matters needing attention are the establishment of a comprehensive national insurance scheme, embracing insurance against sickness, accident and unemployment, and a Commonwealth compulsory wheat pool for Australia. Further legislation should be introduced to provide for a scheme of childhood endowment.-. Those matters have been side-stepped by this Government, principally because their inauguration might jeopardize the profits of the wealthy combinations that supply the bulk of the fighting funds of the Nationalist party. </para>
<para>In the course of his speech the Minister for Trade and Customs claimed that much had been done by the Commonwealth Government to assist the Australian cotton industry. 1 admit that the industry has been afforded a measure of help by this Government, but not so much as would have been given had this party been in power, as the Labour party was pledged to a bounty of 2d. per lb. by a speech made by the Leader of the Opposition. I endeavoured to induce the Commonwealth Government to grant a bounty of 2d. per lb. for ten years, or, failing that, at least for a period of five years. Instead of complying with my suggestion, the Government granted a bounty of <inline font-style="italic">lid.</inline> per lb. for five years. The only support I got was from honorable members on this side of the House. That bounty of 2d. per lb. could have been paid, and still the annual expenditure would have been well within the limit of appropriation for the year. The appropriation was £120,000, and the bounty paid last year was only in the vicinity of £15,000, while a bounty at the rate of 2d. per lb. would have cost only £20,000. The cotton-growing industry is an important one, and I am vitally interested in it, because there is more cotton grown in my electorate than in any other electorate in Australia. The cotton-spinning mills are having a bad time, and the grower consequently feels the pinch because the best market for his product is the home market. Many of these mills are not operating at all, or are doing so only to a limited extent, because they cannot compete with imported yarn. Such yarn can be landed here from England for ½d. per lb. less than similar material can be produced in Australia; while from America it can be landed for lcl. per lb. less. Another matter which the Minister should take into consideration is that there is no bounty paid on cotton used in percentage yarn, tl] at is, yarn containing both wool and cotton. The higher grades of cotton are used in the manufacture of this yarn. The imported percentage is sold here at a lower price than the Australian yarn. The result is that the local cotton-spinning mills are working half time, or are standing idle, and are not able to buy the raw cotton produced in Queensland. Then take tariff item No. 105. The 6-oz. minimum on cotton tweeds is being defeated by the J apanese, who are exporting to this country cotton tweeds weighing 5f oz. to 5£ oz. a yard. In December last, when the tariff schedule was before the House, 1 strongly urged that the proposed increase of duty on cotton piece goods and socks and stockings should be made operative at once. It was the intention of the Government to make it operative from the 1st July of this year. Eventually the Minister agreed to have the duties brought into force in January, but the importing friends of the Government got busy in the meantime, and imported large quantities of yarn, with the result that the Australian cotton-spinners have not used up the raw cotton bought from Queensland last season, and they say that they will not be able to buy any more cotton from that, State for the coming season. In December last I quoted figures dealing with the importation of cotton fabrics from Japan, and I asked the Government whether it stood for the importation of goods from a country which worked- long hours for 17s. a week, when such goods were the means of throwing Australian workmen out of employment. The importations from Japan were as follows : - </para>
<para class="block">
<graphic href="117331192803016_11_0.jpg" />
</para>
<para class="block">The result of this has been that the Australian manufacturer is being knocked out. So much of these cotton fabrics have been imported into Australia that the cotton-spinning mills here are practically idle, and the Queensland cottongrowing industry is threatened with extinction if something is not done by the Government. It is no excuse to say that we have already dealt with the tariff. Has not this Parliament power to re-consider the question. It is for the Government to bring this matter before Parliament again, and to propose the necessary relief to the industry. In the <inline font-style="italic">Labour Review</inline> of the United States of America of November, 1926, there is a paragraph reading as follows : - </para>
<quote>
<para>In Japan since 1923 the legal limit for factory hours has been eleven a day (without a weekly limit). The legal age for beginning work up to the present year was twelve. . . . In practice children of both sexes go to work as soon as any employer is willing ito take them. Average wages are 19s. 3d. a week for male adults, and 12s. Od. a week for female adults. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">That is what the Australian manufacturer is being asked to compete against. It is absolutely impossible to compete, and it is quite clear that the measure of protection given by the Government is not sufficient. This protection should be increased to enable the Australian manufacturer to go on producing yarn and buying the raw cotton from the growers in Queensland. Last year the Australian cotton crop amounted to 4,S24 bales, and was sold by the Cotton Pool Board to the Australian manufacturers. The. chief purchasers were G. A. Bond and Company, 2,038 bales, the Australian Silk and Cotton Mills, 1,873 bales, and Vicars and Company, 727 bales. Because of this local market the growers obtained a better price for their product, which realized. 5d. per lb. for seed cotton. If the cotton had been exported to Liverpool the growers would have been 2£d. per lb. worse off. That is why they advocate a higher duty on imported cotton fabrics in order to keep the product of alien coloured labour out of the country. Shortly after entering into contracts for the last season's crop, the Australian manufacturers found that they were unable to dispose of the manufactured goods and yarn at satisfactory, prices, owing to the large importations of foreign goods from abroad. I appeal to the Government to do something, and to cease this lip-loyalty to the cause of protection. I know it is difficult for a man like the Minister for Trade and Customs, but as the Government was returned on a protectionist policy it ought to give effect to that policy. I give the honorable member for Swan <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Gregory)</inline> great credit for the freetrade influence he wields, although he is not in the Ministry. I have been over in his electorate, where he makes certain promises to his constituents regarding tariff rates, and I -have no doubt that he plays an important part in keeping down the duties. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KV8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">STEWART, Percy</name>
<name role="display">Mr Stewart</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member is mistaken in saying that the members of the Cabinet come here pledged to a protectionist policy. Half of them are not pledged to any such policY. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is so. In Queensland every candidate supporting the Government described himself as a protectionist, whereas in "Western Australia every Government candidate was pledged to a reduction of the tariff. In Victoria a " shandy gaff " policy was supported. To the credit of the honorable member for Swan <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Gregory)</inline> it must be said that he is consistent. Like the honorable member for Forrest <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Prowse)</inline> he would wipe out the sugar embargo and abolish the Arbitration Court to-morrow. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFE</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GREGORY, Henry</name>
<name role="display">Mr Gregory</name>
</talker>
<para>- I should like the honorable member to show, if he can, how Australia has profited by its protectionist policy. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3481</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- "With half the members of the Cabinet in favour of freetrade, and the remainder supporting what they term a "reasonable protectionist policy," the sugar industry of Queensland would be in jeopardy if it were not for the unanimous vote on this side of the House in favour of the embargo. There is no certainty that the Government will not at any time declare itself to be in favour of partial freetrade. Members of the Labour party are united in their belief that, in the interests of Australia, and in order to keep out sugar grown by black labour, the embargo on imported sugar should be continued. While I am a firm believer in Empire preference, I do not believe in granting to Great Britain preference to the extent of £10,000,000 per annum and receiving in return preference worth only £500,000. Sugar entering England from foreign countries pays a duty of £11 13s. 4d. per ton. As the preference to Empire grown sugar is £4 5s. 7d. per ton, Australian grown sugar sold in England must pay a duty of £7 7s. 9d. per ton. In my opinion a proper system of Empire preference would admit Australian sugar into England free. That would make it possible for a large number of British migrants to be employed in growing sugar in the rich coastal districts of Queensland, where they could make a better living than could be made on some of the poorer country in other portions of Australia. I trust that, as a result of his visit to Australia, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Amery,</inline> the Secretary of State for the Dominions, will induce the British Government to wipe out the duty now imposed on Australian sugar entering England. That could be done without increasing the price of sugar to the British consumer. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVS</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THEODORE, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr Theodore</name>
</talker>
<para>- That would be real Empire preference. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- It would confer a real benefit on Australia, because it would mean an extra £2,000,000 per annum to the Australian sugar industry and provide additional employment in this country. Sugar to the value of £27,000,000 is imported annually into England from foreign countries, whereas the value of the sugar imported from within the Empire is only £6,000,000 per annum. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KVS</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">THEODORE, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr Theodore</name>
</talker>
<para>- Sugar sufficient to meet England's requirements could, be grown in Queensland. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- That is so. A proper system of Empire preference would enable our sugar industry to maintain a much greater population. I hope that some of the emissaries from Great Britain like <inline font-weight="bold">Sir Robert</inline> Home, whose ability and interest in the Empire - are beyond question, will do what they can to induce the British Ministry to grant a real measure of Empire preference. Such a policy would solve Australia's problem of an over-production of sugar, and be of incalculable benefit to the Australian sugargrowers, and consequently to. Australia as a nation. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>The Government should give earnest consideration to the proposal to construct a railway from the Northern Territory through Western Queensland to Bourke. During the recent drought in Queensland, 7,500,000 sheep perished. If we add to that number a natural increase of 2,500,000 sheep which also was lost, we have a loss of approximately 10,000,0.00 sheep, worth at least £10,000,000. Cattle to the number of 2,000,000 also perished in the country which would be traversed by the railway I have mentioned. Allowing for the natural increase, the total, loss of cattle would be probably nearer 3,000,000. The value of the live-stock lost during that drought in the area which would be served by the railway would pay for its construction. In considering this proposal the Government should bear in mind that within the next few years millions of acres of good pastoral land along the route of the proposed railway will revert to the Crown. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJM</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JACKSON, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr Jackson</name>
</talker>
<para>- It will not be of much value if it is covered with prickly pear. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3482</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The prickly pear is not a menace in the area which that railway would serve. I am not suggesting, that a line should be constructed along the South Australian border, but that, it should serve Winton, Longreach, and Charleville, following the best course to Bourke. Such a line would tap some of the best pastoral land in Queensland. It is estimated that every five years Australia loses merino sheep to the value of £22,000,000 through drought. The area most affected is, unfortunately, Western Queensland. The construction of the line suggested would be justified, not only as a means of saving our valuable herds, but also as' a means' of defence. Economically it would be a sound proposition. The line would link the Northern Territory with the large centres- blf 'population in the eastern coastal districts of Australia. The Prime Minister has had this matter under consideration, and I remind his colleagues* of the very favorable statement he made at Longreach, as reported in the <inline font-style="italic">Sydney Mail</inline> of the 10th August, 1927 - </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<quote>
<para>They must be provided with facilities to move their stock in drought times into areas where drought did not prevail. The great disadvantage obtaining in Queensland to-day was that they had three great railway systems running east and west, and they were not linked up in the western part of the State by a line running north and south,' and, if possible, running south as far as Bourke, in New South Wales. It might be advantageous to construct a line from the Federal Territory linking up the train systems of Queensland and New South Wales. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">I ask him to do something practical towards giving effect to that statement, and not to allow it to go by the board as have undertakings he gave on the eve of the last election in regard to unemployment insurance, and the provision of £20,000,000 to provide cheaper houses for the people. His speech at Longreach showed that he realized the importance of that great national project, and if he will only put his words into practice he will be helping to develop the backblocks. We hear frequent lamentations regarding the tendency of people to flock from the country into the cities. This project offers a chance to the Government to do something big and statesmanlike for the development of the great rich provinces of western Queensland and New South Wales. Another important aspect of the proposed railway, and one which has an important bearing on the welfare of the people in the large centres of population, is the threatened shortage of meat. Unfortunately, owing to the great war and the Argentine's defeat of Australia in the meat . markets of the old world, there has been serious depression in the cattle industry in Queensland. But I think that <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. A.</inline> J. B. McMaster put the case well when he said recently, speaking on behalf of the United Graziers' Association - </para>
<quote>
<para>I do believe, however, that with the great increase in the Australian population the cuttle industry will soon become a paying proposition, which it has not been for a number of years. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">The great majority of Australia's cattle are in central, north and north-western Queensland, but they cannot be made available cheaply in the markets without improved means of transport. The absence of .transport facilities is one of the greatest obstacles to the development of the big spaces of Australia, and I believe that the proposed railway is justified, not only as a defence and economic factor, but also as a means of transporting hundreds of thousands of cattle from the north-west of Queensland to the southern markets. It is estimated that 80' per cent, of our cattle are killed for local consumption ; therefore, if the Australian population were to increase by 1,500,000, we could consume all the cattle the country produces. When, however,' the beasts have to be travelled by road from North Queensland, from six to nine months is lost in this way, and further delay occurs in restoring them to market condition. A railway would put the cattle into the market much more rapidly and in better condition. </para>
<para>I have a few words to say regarding the need for a policy for the man on the land. I expected that long ere this the alleged Country party would have enunciated a policy to assure to the farmer a living wage. When the party first came into being in Victoria, some years ago, its slogan was, " A living wage for the man on the land." Its leaders argued that the farmer had as much right as any one else to a living wage, and the honorable member for Echuca <inline font-weight="bold">(Mr. Hill),</inline> who is a Minister in the present composite Government, became eloquent on this subject. Speaking as president of the Victorian Farmers' Union on 25th September, 1917, he trounced the Nationalists, who, he said, were prostituting the word " national " and were political spendthrifts who were seeking to be returned to their snug billets under the flag of nationalism. He deplored the fact that the people were flocking from the country into the cities to swell the number of unemployed, and said that the farmers would have to band together in a separate party to get due recognition. To convince his farmer friends that he would not be found dead in a 40-acre paddock with the Nationalists, he said - </para>
<quote>
<para>Personally I would be prepared to 'go down and die fighting rather than sacrifice any of those principles, the acknowledgment and adoption of which has caused us to band together. </para>
</quote>
<para class="block">But did he adhere to those principles when the honorable member for </para>
<para class="block">Wimmera had to step out of the Ministry because he found he was being pushed by the hand of big business to do things against his convictions? No; he smugly stepped into the position vacated by his fellow member of - the Country party and as an ex-President of the Victorian Farmers' Union is to-day one of the leaders of the alleged Country party wing of the composite Ministry. </para>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KJM</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">JACKSON, David</name>
<name role="display">Mr Jackson</name>
</talker>
<para>- The honorable member forgets that the light had been switched on by the Treasurer. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- The Treasurer did say of the Nationalists prior to entering into an alliance with them - " We switched on the light and compelled them to drop the loot". Apparently the Treasurer and his colleagues followed the light and shared the loot. I am not surprised that an upright man like the honorable member for Wimmera refused to be a party to the methods of the composite Ministry, and it is little wonder that the unfortunate farmers who were described by the honorable member for Echuca fis serfs, have decided that if they cannot be represented by a genuine Country party, they will support the Labour party which, they know, is free and untrammelled and will help them, even at the risk of interfering with the profits of the middlemen who support Nationalism. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
<para>After all his protestations,- we expected the honorable member for Cowper <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr. Earle Page)</inline> to bring forward a policy to help the dairy-farmer and the man on the land. He has always been ready to please their ears with platitudes and fulsome flattery. Speaking at Byron Bay on the 11th January, he said - </para>
<quote>
<para>Tlie Australian Government has given the dairy farmers the machinery and the opportunity to succeed. Now what is necessary is a complete 100 per cent, co-operation of all the individual units of the industry. </para>
</quote>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KV8</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">STEWART, Percy</name>
<name role="display">Mr Stewart</name>
</talker>
<para>- Voluntary cooperation too. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />