/
19460801_reps_17_188.xml
5689 lines (5689 loc) · 652 KB
/
19460801_reps_17_188.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<hansard xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../hansard.xsd" version="2.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<session.header>
<date>1946-08-01</date>
<parliament.no>17</parliament.no>
<session.no>3</session.no>
<period.no>2</period.no>
<chamber>REPS</chamber>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<proof>0</proof>
</session.header>
<chamber.xscript>
<para class="block">House of Representatives. </para>
<business.start>
<day.start>1946-08-01</day.start>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Speaker (Hon. J. S.Rosevear)</inline>took the chair at 10.30 a.m., and read prayers. </para>
</business.start>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>ARMED FORCES</title>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Taxationof Deferred Pay</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JVH</name.id>
<electorate>SWAN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MOUNTJOY, Donald</name>
<name role="display">Mr MOUNTJOY</name>
</talker>
<para>- A constituent of mine has stated in a letter to me that the rumour is circulating that the deferred pay of members of the services is being regarded as taxable income. Will the Treasurer state whether deferred pay has been regarded as taxable income atany time in the past, or is so regarded to-day? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate>MACQUARIE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Prime Minister</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- In the early years of the war, the majority of those who retired from the services were permanent members of the forces. Because of the conditions under which they received the equivalent of deferred pay, some taxation was imposed. In about March, 1 943, the act was amended to make it perfectly clear that in future all deferred pay and interest thereon should be free from taxation. That provision was made to apply to income received from this source during 1942. Deferred pay and interest thereon are not now subject to tax of any kind. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>PRICE OF EGGS</title>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L0G</name.id>
<electorate>FLINDERS, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RYAN, Rupert</name>
<name role="display">Mr RYAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Last March, I directed the attention of the House to the injustice under which poultry farmers were suffering by reason of the fact that, whilst the ceiling prices of eggs remained constant the costs of production had risen very considerably during this year. The Minister for Commerce and Agriculture informed me subsequently that the matter had been referred to the Prices Commissioner for a decision. Although four months have elapsed, a decision has not yet been made. Can the Minister assign a reason for this long delay, and will he ensure an early decision? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQB</name.id>
<electorate>GWYDIR, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Commerce and Agriculture</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Representations in this matter have been made not only to the Department of Commerce and Agriculture but also to the Prices Commissioner. Those received by my department were passed on to the Prices Commissioner, who has not so far considered that any reason exists for increasing the price of eggs. He still has the matter under consideration, and I expect that he will make a definite decision. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L0G</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">RYAN, Rupert</name>
<name role="display">Mr Ryan</name>
</talker>
<para>- Can the honorable gentleman hasten the decision? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall do all that I can to assist to that end. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>AUSTRALIAN ARMY</title>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Motorvehicles</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3483</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KFX</name.id>
<electorate>LILLEY, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HADLEY, James</name>
<name role="display">Mr HADLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is the Minister for the Army aware that near Brisbane an immense number of military motor vehicles of all types, with good tyres . and spares, have been standing in the open air inall kinds of weather .for months? Under suchconditions, will not the tyres perish! Does not the right honorable gentleman regard this as wilful and deliberate waste of public money? Will he state the number of military vehicles lying idle' in Australia, and where they are situated ? Why are . these vehicles .being allowed to become valueless while, producers and others are unable to procure motor vehicles and tyres.? ' </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate>CAPRICORNIA, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for the Army</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>-The Army declares surplus all military' vehicles and other equipment that it will not require in the post-war period. Up to date, equipment of a value of approximately £160,000,000, has been declared surplus, for disposal by the Commonwealth Disposals Commission. Many millions of feet of storage space would be needed to store all of this equipment. . Consequently, the vehicles have to be accommodated at present in parks or other open spaces. I have taken action to ensure that the QuartermasterGeneral and the Master-General of Ordnance shall make a close survey of all equipment so held, and that definite instructions shall be given that all equipment that can be declared surplus and sold shall be sold as soon as possible, and other equipment bought later. Many of the vehicles which the public considers to be Army equipment which is lying idle is lend-lease property,- and iii accordance with a recent agreement' cannot be sold. I ant g'ad the honorable member has raised ' the . matter. A further close scrutiny will be made of all army vehicles being stored in the vicinity of. Brisbane, with a view to making them available to the public, if possible. ' </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L0X</name.id>
<electorate>FORREST, WESTERN AUSTRALIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">LEMMON, Nelson</name>
<name role="display">Mr LEMMON</name>
</talker>
<para>- As Australia has now acquired certain commercial vehicles, such as motor trucks and cars, consequent upon the conclusion of the lend-lease arrangements, and as most of the vehicles are to . be found in the eastern States, particularly New South Wales and Queensland, will the Minister representing the Minister for Supply and Shipping' take steps to ensure that when the disposal takes place, an equitable quantity shall be made available to Western Australia? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate>CORIO, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Post-war Reconstruction</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Is it true that, with the expiration of the lend-lease agree ment, a large .number of motor vehicles will now be available for disposal in Australia. Before the negotiations were completed, steps had already been- taken by the Commonwealth Disposals Commission to ensure that the vehicles . should be listed and classified, so that they might be disposed of at the earliest possible date.' I agree that steps should be taken to provide for an equitable distribution of them between the various States. Although I am not. aware of the '.details, because the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Minister for Supply and Shipping, I am sure that my - colleague will already have taken measures to ensure that Western Australia shall receive a fair share of the vehicles. There is a difficulty in that some of .the vehicles are fitted for left-hand driving, and the law in some States prohibits the use of .such vehicles. I- shall bring the matter to .the notice of the Minister for Supply and Shipping, and I am sure that the suggestion of the honorable member will be given effect. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DAIRYING INDUSTRY</title>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLL</name.id>
<electorate>NEW ENGLAND, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ABBOTT, Joseph</name>
<name role="display">Mr ABBOTT</name>
</talker>
<para>- Wi Will the .Minister for Commerce and Agriculture inform the House whether the report in this morning's press is correct that the Governments of Great. Britain and ' Aus-, tralia have completed negotiations' for a revision- of the prices which Britain pays for Australian dairy products? If the report -is accurate, will the Minister state what are .the new prices,' and also what prices are to be paid 'by Great Britain to Denmark for similar products? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3484</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Contracts have been completed and prices determined in respect of dairy and meat products, and at the earliest opportunity, I shall make a public statement with .regard to the matter. It is necessary to obtain the acquiescence of the Government of Great Britain in the release of the conditions of the contracts. As to the 'prices to be paid by the Government of Great Britain to Denmark for similar products, that is entirely a matter between the Governments -.concerned. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>ATOMIC ENERGY</title>
<page.no>3485</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>United Nations Commission</title>
<page.no>3485</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3485</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KLL</name.id>
<electorate>Hindmarsh</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for the Navy, Minister for Munitions and Minister for Aircraft Production</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MAKIN, Norman</name>
<name role="display">Mr MAKIN</name>
</talker>
<para>. - I lay on the table the following paper : - </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>United Nations - Atomic Energy Commission - Statement of Australia's Participation</title>
<page.no>3485</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para class="block">With the consent of the House, I incorporate the following statement in <inline font-style="italic">Hansard : -</inline></para>
<para>As a result of election to the Security Council by the General Assembly of the United Nations last January, Australia has been given an opportunity to play a prominent part in discussions relating to the future of atomic energy, and to share in one of the most responsible tasks ever placed upon a group of nations. In accepting that responsibility the Australian Government is conscious both of the need for removing the danger of destruction which . is threatened by the atomicbomb, and also of developing to the full great possibilities which this scientific discovery holds for the benefit of mankind. This second aspect is particularly important for Australia, where development of new sources of power may show the way to great material progress and removal of substantialdisabilities. </para>
<para>Recognizing this responsibility and opportunity, the Australian Government thought it desirable that a senior Cabinet Minister should be present at the inauguration of the work of the Atomic Energy Commission, and the Government therefore arranged for the Minister for External Affairs <inline font-weight="bold">(Dr. Evatt)</inline> at the close of the British Commonwealth talks in London last May, to go to New York to represent Australia on the Commission. At the same time it was arranged that two distinguished Australian scientists, Professor M. L. Oliphant, world authority on Nuclear Physics, and <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. G.</inline> H. Briggs of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, should accompany <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> as technical advisers. The Delegation was completed with permanent Australian officials already available at the United Nations head-quarters and had the advantage of consultation with the leader of the Australian Military Mission at Washington, Major-General </para>
<para class="block">John A. Chapman, who himself attended a number of the commission meetings or was represented by deputies. </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline>had the honour to be selected as the first chairman of the commission and was thus able to exercise a decisive influence on proceedings and ensure that the commission started work quickly and practically. I now propose to give to the House some account of the work of the commission and of the Australian contribution during the first month of its existence. </para>
<para>The Atomic Energy Commission was set up by resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations on the 24th January, 1946. It consists of all members of the Security Council together with a representative of Canada when Canada is not a member of the council. The terms of reference of the commission require that it " shall proceed with the utmost despatch to inquire into all phases of the problem ". In particular the commission is to make specific proposals - </para>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>For extending between all nations the exchange of basic scientific information for peaceful ends. </para>
</item>
<item label="(b)">
<para>For control of atomic . energy to the extent necessary to ensure its use only for peaceful purposes. </para>
</item>
<item label="(c)">
<para>For the elimination from national armaments of atomic weapons and of all other major weapons, adaptable to mass destruction. </para>
</item>
<item label="(d)">
<para>For effective -safeguards by way of inspection and other means to protect complying states against the hazards ofviolation and evasions. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>The General Assembly resolution provides that the work of the commission is to proceed by separate stages in order that the successful completion of each stage may develop the necessary confidence of the world before the next is undertaken. The reports and recommendations of the commission will be submittedto the Security Council, to which on matters affecting security the commission is accountable. These reports and recommendations are to be made public unless the council in the interests of peace and security directs otherwise. Wherever appropriate, the Security Council must transmit these reports to the General Assembly and other appropriate organs of the United Nations. The commission is required not to infringe upon the responsibilities of any organ of theUnited Nations. </para>
<para>The commission held its first meeting in New York on the 14th June. It was decided that it would follow the provisional rules of procedure of the Security Council in accordance with which the chairmanship rotates monthly in the English alphabetical order of the countries represented. The Australian Minister for External Affairs, <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt,</inline> therefore, became chairman for the first month of the commission's work. </para>
<para>At the opening meeting the United Slates of America representative, <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Bernard</inline> Baruch, proposed the creation of an International Atomic Development Authority to be entrusted with control over all phases of development and the use of atomic energy. He declared that when an adequate system for control of atomic energy, including renunciation of the bomb as a weapon, had been agreed upon and put into effective operation, and condign punishments effectively prescribed for violation of rules of control, then the manufacture of atomic bombs should stop, existing bombs should he disposed of pursuant to the terms of an international treaty and an international atomic authority should be placed in possession of full information regarding the production of atomic energy. In other words, given an adequate system of control, the United States of America was willing to surrender its virtual monopoly in atomic activities. This was a most liberal offer and a hopeful start to the commission's work. </para>
<para>The Soviet representative made a different approach. He asked that the first step should be an international convention for the renunciation of atomic weapons and a total ban on their production, this step to be followed by sharing of atomic secrets. Both of those steps were to be preliminary to theestablishment of a system of control providing severe penalties for violations of the convention. </para>
<para>For obvious reasons those in possession of atomic knowledge were not disposed to share it until they had some certainty of control with adequate safeguards against violation. Thus as foreseen in the General Assembly resolution, the Atomic Energy Commission was immediately confronted with the problem of how to define successive stages by which atomic control should be introduced. </para>
<para>General debate followed and revealed a large measure of support for the broad lines of the United States proposals. But this general discussion might easily have drifted into a repetition of lofty aspirations and constant assertions that great problems had to be faced, without much practical progress. Therefore, <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt,</inline> as chairman, in concluding the general debate, underlined the dangers of delay and stressed the possibilities of beneficial development of atomic energy as well as its dangerous uses. He directed attention away from the difficult question of successive steps by which control should be introduced and stressed the importance of consideringthe problem as a whole. He pointed out that underlying the whole discussion there was - </para>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>The idea of some form of international atomic energy authority, and </para>
</item>
<item label="(b)">
<para>The idea that all nations should accept certain obligations regarding the use of atomic energy. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>At his suggestion the commission then established a working committee comprised of all members to examine various proposals that had been made and discover the main principles. I append to this statement the text of a speech made by <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> on the 25th June, 1946, setting out in detail the views of the Australian Government. </para>
<para>Under the leadershipof <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> the working committee quickly proceeded to comparative study of the various proposals and appointed a sub-committee of six to discuss in greater detail areas of difference. The meetings of this subcommittee, which were held in private, were most useful. It was not possible, nor was it attempted, to draw up immediately an agreed statement acceptable to every member of the commission. Indeed, if such an attempt had been made a great deal of time would have been lost and the result would probably have been a document crowded with qualifications and provisos. Instead, the committee accepted their chairman's suggestions for a practical approach to the problems involved. <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> also gave a clear lead on constitutional problems surrounding the creation of the atomic authority. </para>
<para>The nature of the problems considered by the sub-committee and progress made are indicated clearly in the series of working papers presented by the representatives of the United States of America, France and Australia, and particularly in the general report made to the working committee by <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> on the proceedings of the sub-committee. This report draws attention to three important questions of principle, detailed consideration of which will be essential before the plan of atomic control can be drafted. </para>
<para>The first of these was whether it would be desirable to negotiate an international convention dealing solely with the outlawing of " atomic weapons " and the destruction of existing stocks, or whether on the other hand an obligation not to make or use such weapons should be included within the framework of a broad general plan, an essential part of which should be an effective system of controls to ensure that atomic energy would be employed only for peaceful purposes. <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt's</inline> report indicated that the opinion of the majority of the comrnittee favoured the second alternative. The second question was the general type of international controlsand measures necessary for inclusion within the framework of the general plan, including in such controls the establishment of a special international agency vested with executive power to determine and enforce controls and also to promote development of atomic energy for peaceful purposes. The third principle requiring consideration was the relationship between organized measures for the international control of atomic energy and the United Nations, particularly the Security Council. </para>
<para>There was general agreement by members of the sub-committee that, at a stage to be determined, an international agree ment not to produce oruse atomic weapons for purposes of war should be entered into. The majority view, however, which included that of the United States, held strongly that a mere convention to outlaw the use of atomic weapons was inadequate in view of past experience of the inefficacy of certain international pacts. Moreover the majority considered that atomic weapons could and should be eliminated by direct measures of inspection and control and, further, that such a control system would make the proposed convention largely superfluous. What was required was the detailed preparation of an adequate system of international control such as would in fact ensure the use of atomic energy for peaceful purposes only. </para>
<para>The United States view, which had considerable support in the subcommittee, was that an international agency wielding such control would need to have power to obtain complete control over or own uranium, thorium or other potential sources of atomic energy; to own or rigidly control all facilities for production of U.235, plutonium and such other fissionable materials as it determined to be dangerous; to control such other facilities and activities in the field of atomic energy as might be dangerous in other hands ; to have unhindered access to and power to control, license and inspect all other facilities which possess, utilize or produce materials which are the source of atomic energy, and to carry out other related functions. </para>
<para>There was general support in the subcommittee for the view that the system of control should be established by a single treaty which would define the obligations to be accepted by member states and at the same time, establish the control agency, define its form of organization, functions and powers, and, so far as necessary, its relationship to the various organs of the United Nations. </para>
<para>Concerning the relation between the proposed agency and the Security Council, <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> expressed the view that it was legally and practically impossible for the functions of the Security Council to be enlarged so as to include the multiferous and detailed executive decisions involved in administering a treaty providing for the control and development of atomic energy. Under the Charter the Security Council, he argued, has no excutive powers of such a character. Its executive powers exist onlyin situations where a threat to the peace, breach of the peace of act of aggression have been proved to exist in accordance with Chapter VII. of the Charter. The essential and urgent problem was to devise means by which power might be given by treaty to an atomic energy agency to control and supervise the development of atomic energy in such a way that neither threats to peace nor any rupture of the peace could be caused by the employment of atomic weapons. In other words, <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> emphasized that the objective must be to make the control system so effective that plans for violations or evasions, whether of a major or minor character, could be detected at the earliest stages and prompt measures taken for effective prevention. Such an objective would not be incompatible with the invoking by the agency of the machinery of the Security Council in a special situation or by a complainant state if the control measures provided by the agency were for any reason found to be inadequate. </para>
<para>The same report also drew attention to another major problem; namely whether -or not there should be a veto power protecting violators of atomic energy agreements. The constitutional side of this problem has already been referred to above. The Australian view expressed by <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> on the general issue of the veto is that every party to the atomic -energy treaty would necessarily be subject to rules of conduct laid down either in the treaty itself or by an international control agency established by such treaty. It follows from this principle that no system of veto could be permitted in the procedure of the atomic energy agency because admission of the veto power would mean a right or privilege to claim a special immunity or exemption from the rules and regulations of conduct, thus subverting the main purposes of the overall plan for international control. It was emphasized that' the binding effect of any system of international controls could be evaded, either by including in the charter provisions for granting special immunity to one or more nations, or by conferring on the Security Council the additional function of administering the control system. Inasmuch as the veto power would be available to any of the permanent members of the council, the effect of the latter plan would be equally to confer special immunity on certain states and thus again' destroy the practical effectiveness of any system of international control. </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt's</inline>report concluded by stating that the problem appeared to demand for its solution - </para>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>. The establishment by multilateral treaty of a special international agency for atomic energy control and development. </para>
</item>
<item label="(b)">
<para>The vesting of administrative and executive powers in such agency. </para>
</item>
<item label="(c)">
<para>Establishing the responsibility of such agency to the signatory nations, and </para>
</item>
<item label="(d)">
<para>Bringing the agency into special relationship with the United Nations. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>The immediate result of the work of sub-committee No. 1 was the setting up by the Working Committee of three further committees which will immediately proceed to the detailed examination of problems of atomic control. Briefly,0 the terms of reference of these committees are as follows:- </para>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>Committee No. 2 is to examine and make recommendations on questions associated with the control of atomic energy activities ; </para>
</item>
<item label="(b)">
<para>Legal advisory committee is to advise on all legal and drafting matters, to examine legal aspects of relationships with the United Nations and ultimately to submit a draft treaty or treaties to the Working Committee, and </para>
</item>
<item label="(c)">
<para>Scientific and technical committeeis to advise the Working Committee and all other committees on the Commission on scientific and technical questions referred to it and to consider and recommend proposals for the exchange of information, for the peaceful use of atomic energy and on all scientific and technical matters. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>It was agreed that each committee should consist of twelve members, i.e., a representative of each Government member of the commission. </para>
<para>The result, therefore, of the month's vigorous and purposeful chairmanship by <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> has been to bring to the surface essential problems and to create organizational machinery bywhich the Atomic Energy Commission can proceed to work on those problems. At the close of his term of office, high tribute was paid to the outstanding contribution which the Australian representative had made to the inauguration of the Commission's work. Owing to the imminence of the Peace Conference in Paris, <inline font-weight="bold">Dr. Evatt</inline> was obliged to leave New York, but in his absence his deputies at the Australian delegation will carry on along the lines laid down. </para>
<para>The difficulties ahead of the commission should not be minimized. Militarily and industrially atomic energy may prove one of the most far-reaching discoveries ever made by man. It can change world pictures of national power. Great national interests are at stake and only by tolerance, understanding, readiness to negotiate, and, above all, trust, can those national interests be made to yield to international co-operation. This is a great political problem as well as a scientific and organizational problem, and it would be foolish and blind not to recognize that after the first month's work the political obstacles seem far greater than the technical and organizational difficulties. </para>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Appendix</title>
<page.no>3489</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION</title>
<page.no>3489</page.no>
<type>miscellaneous</type>
</debateinfo>
<para>Speech by the <inline font-weight="bold">Chairman, Dr. H.</inline> V. Evatt (Australia), 25 June, 1946. </para>
<para>Before closing this general discussion of the question of the statement of the United States of America representative and of the Assembly resolution, I shall state briefly the views of Australia on the proposals which have been placed before us. </para>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">The Problem must be Considered as a Whole.</inline>
</para>
<para>One essential point must be made clearat the outset. </para>
<para>The highly complex problem which confronts us should be considered as a whole. It is not sound to deal with any one of its many aspects in isolation. Action which is proposed in one direction must necessarily have a bearing on action which is taken or proposed in other directions. </para>
<para>From this point of view - that the problem is to be dealt with as a whole - the plan submitted by the United States of America representative offers a sound basis; for planning. The Australian Government is in general agreement with the proposal made by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Baruch</inline> that, as part of a single plan, an international authority , be established for the purpose of preventing the misuse of atomic energy and ensuring its use for the purpose of promoting the general welfare of mankind. </para>
<para>
<inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Gromyko</inline>has suggested the study of a draft international agreement forbidding the manufacture and use of atomic weapons, to be followed by other measures involving strict supervision and control to see that the terms of the agreements are strictly observed. This suggestion must receive careful consideration and, I believe, it can be fitted into the general plan implied in the United States of America proposals. <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Gromyko's</inline> proposals, however, do not, in my view, give sufficient recognition to the essential interrelation between all the various parts of the one great problem. </para>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Dangers of Delay</title>
<page.no>3489</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>It was with a conviction of the urgency of this single problem that the Assembly instructed this commission to proceed " with the utmost despatch". This urgency is based on bothnegative and positive reasons. Negatively, atomic energy is such a danger to humanity that it must be lessened and then removed. Positively, atomic energy can be such a boon to humanity that we mustnot delay in releasing its beneficial forces. It was inevitable that modern scientific methods would reveal the hidden energy within the atom. Much as some might wish to do so, the world cannot now return to the preatomic age. The problems of the atomic age cannot be evaded by suppression of the relevant scientific facts. The problem must be faced boldly and solved quickly. </para>
<para>If there is long delay in solving the international aspects of the problem, scientists in one country or another will discover new and revolutionary processes for the release of atomic energy. They may prove very tenacious of such secrets. </para>
<para>Delay may also lead nations to build stockpiles of fissionable materials for atomic bombs with the result that required material will not be available for the production and use of atomic energy for industrial and scientific purposes. </para>
<para>Long delay may even endanger the United Nations organization itself for delay may arouse the suspicion of the peoples of the world that the Powers will produce atomic weapons because they are incompetent to agree upon a means for just and equitable control. </para>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Diverse Interests of Countries</title>
<page.no>3489</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>It is inevitable in the first instance that any nation will be inclined to approach the problems of atomic energy from the point of view of its own security and welfare. World security and world welfare cannot be successfully promoted if we fail to recognize this tendency. Each nation will wish to avoid the use against itself of the devastating weapons which the release of atomic energy makes possible. Each nation will seek to enjoy as soon as possible the benefits which atomic energy can bring, in scientific development, in the art of medicine and as a source of industrial power. Again, some nations possess in their territories sources of new wealth in ores and concentrates of uranium and thorium. Atomic energy development is not solely or even mainly dependent upon the existing military strength of the powers because the known source of materials are not situated only in the territories of the major powers; in fact, the significant deposits are in the territories of less powerful nations. </para>
<para>It is to be expected that countries which are relatively poor in existing power resources, and particularly those countries which also possess significant deposits of uranium ores and thorium concentrates, should be concerned with the possibility of rapid application of nuclear energy for the production of industrial power. There are nations whose industries may decline in the absence of an alternative to coal as a source of power, and to such countries even the terrors of atomic warfare may often appear more remote than a dwindling economy or decreasing standards of living. There are other countries where supplies Of power not involving the transport of large quantities of coal or the building of long electricaltransmission lines would open up new areas of agricultural or of mineral development. Abundant power at reasonable cost is thelifeblood of modern industry. Power from atomic energy may enable modern communities to flourish in regions remote from existing sources of power. Such nations, for whom the peaceful uses of atomic energy are of more immediate importance, will be likely to demand access at the earliest possible moment to such materials and information as may be necessary for them to develop atomic energy for peaceful purposes. </para>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">Need for Just and Equitable Time-table.</inline>
</para>
<para>These considerations should all be borne in mind when the time-table for the world developmental authority, the exchange of information, and the imposition of controls and sanctions are being discussed and planned. On the one hand the very special position reached by the United States of America in the field has to be fully understood and an immediate and complete disclosure of their monopoly of knowledge could not be supported and would not be in the general interest of mankind. But on the other hand, a retarded time-table for disclosure must leave the development of atomic energy for many years in the hands of a few nations, other nations being handicapped seriously in their development. Accordingly, the steps to be taken should be clearly set out and follow one another in just and equitable sequence as part of the overall plan. </para>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">Supply of Radio-active Substances.</inline>
</para>
<para>There is one step which might well be taken immediately. The importance of radio-active substances in scientific research in general and in medical research in particular, is so great that it is in the interests of every nation that supplies of these materials should be available to all workers in these fields at the earliest possible moment. No one country or group of countries would wish to have a monopoly of these materials. Even if for the time being one or a few countries alone possess the facilities for the manufacture of radio-active substances, all countries should be able to secure on reasonable terms their fair share of such substances. </para>
<para>I have already mentioned the special interest of those countries which possess within their territories deposits of uranium and thorium and who are thus able to make an important contribution as suppliers of raw materials. One should not be surprised if some such countries are reluctant to accept control of their product by an international authority unless controls are also accepted by those countries possessing plants for the production of fissionable materials. Therefore, while control of mining operations and of the raw materials extracted from the ores may well form an essential basis of international control system, that system will also have to provide for disclosure of scientific and technical information, and for the cessation of production of atomic weapons, on terms and conditions to be agreed upon and defined. All this illustrates the necessity of an international agreement which will in the one instrument define the obligations to be accepted by the parties to the instrument and establish an atomic energy authority through which these obligations canbe made effective. </para>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">Controls by Inspection.</inline>
</para>
<para>If an atomic development authority effectively controlled all sources of raw materials and all plants for the exploitation of atomic energy, as suggested by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Baruch,</inline> that would in itself ensure that no materials will be diverted to military purposes. It is necessary, however, to guard against a country setting up its own plants in secret. Precautions against such an evasion will be required but such precautions need not give a vast army of official inspectors the right to delve into all the activities of a nation in the spheres of general mining and engineering. </para>
<para>Control over officially recognized plants could be assisted by a strict accounting and supervision of all fissionable materials and by exchange of technical personnel between the plants in the various countries. Such workers, exchanged between nations, would be natural vehicles for interchange of technical information, and with a common background of interest and altruism would assist in maintaining understanding and goodwill. </para>
<para>It is obviously impracticable to conduct inspection in such a way that the possibility of secret mining or bomb-making could be completely eliminated, but if the barriers which at present restrict free intercourse between countries could be eliminated or greatly modified, it would become almost impossible to conceal operations on a scale of major military significance. </para>
<para>Any effective system of controls and safeguards should of course be based upon the most up-to-date information available on the technical aspects of atomic energy. The discoveries are so recent that little reliance can be placed on the claim that great improvements in existing methods are improbable, or that an entirely new and revolutionary approach is impossible. Whatever the precise form of the controlling authority it must base its decisions upon adequate knowledge, and proper provision must.be made to keep it informed fully and immediately of any new scientific or technical developments bearing upon the release of atomic energy. </para>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">The Principle of an International Authority.</inline>
</para>
<para>The Australian Government agrees in principle with the proposal for the establishment of an international authority to act as the organ of the United Nations in the field of atomic energy. The exact relationof such an authority with the United Nations will require detailed consideration. One question of this character which was referred to by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Baruch</inline> is the application of the so-called veto. </para>
<para>It is essential that the precise nature of this special privilege should be clearly understood. </para>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>The Veto Power</title>
<page.no>3491</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>At present the veto power relates solely to a particular method of voting in reaching decisions of the Security Council on matters of substance as distinct from procedure. If any one of the five permanent members of the Security Council chooses to do so it can block a decision of the agreed majority (seven) of the eleven council members. Thus the socalled " veto " can only be exercised in the course of voting in the body of the Security Council by a permanent member in order to prevent a vote by seven members of the Council from becoming effective. It is erroneous to apply the term " right of veto " to decisions of the United Nations generally because it is only in relation to one of its organs that the right has been conferred. The right applies solely to the special circumstances of the operations of the Security Council and the possession of such a right in the Council does not give any claim to a similar veto in respect of the operation of any other international authority. </para>
<para>To some extent the recommendations of this commission will require review by the Security Council. In such review the veto may be exercisable according to the circumstances. In this commission itself no veto is exercisable unless we decide to introduce it, which is not contemplated. When the Assembly of the United Nations deals with the welfare aspects of atomic energy, no veto is exercisable. If in the end an international convention establishes a world atomic authority, the day to day administrative decisions of that body may or may not be subject to the veto system of voting. That is a matter for the consideration of this commission when it is reviewing the problem as awhole. </para>
<para>However, I think I should add that in my view nothing has been disclosed regarding the nature of atomic energy or of the possible functions of the proposed international authority on atomic energy to indicate why any particular nation or nations should be accorded the right of veto over the decisions of the agreed majority of the authority. Some lesser powers have important supplies of some materials; one large nation, the United States, has highly developed plants and very special technological knowledge; a number of other nations, large, middle-sized and small, have brilliant scientists; but none of these facts seems to me an argument for applying the special voting rule of the Security Council to the decisions of anew international authority. We should in any event, take this matter of the veto up only in conjunction with the general plan. </para>
<para class="italic">
<inline font-style="italic">Functions of the International Authority.</inline>
</para>
<para>The precise functions of the international authority will ofcourse need to be defined. </para>
<para>The authority should own, distribute and account for all fissionable material obtained from mines or used in plants. It should have responsible officers in every plant or mine capable of producing fissionable materials in appreciable quantities, and should undertake or procure a strict accounting of and access to all fissionable materials used in nondangerous operation. One of its functions should be to ensure equitable distribution of raw materials to all licensed users. </para>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Summary of Australian Proposals</title>
<page.no>3491</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>To sum up - </para>
<para>The Australian Government favoursa general international convention which will - </para>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>vest in an international authority control of all rights in raw materials, processes, plants and the products of plants for the exploitation of all forms of atomic energy, leaving however as much freedom as possible to national and private research and other activity where this is not dangerous to international security ; </para>
</item>
<item label="(b)">
<para>establish a system of effective control and inspection along the lines indicated by <inline font-weight="bold">Mr. Baruch,</inline></para>
</item>
<item label="(c)">
<para>provide that, when the controls and safeguards have been effectively organized, the manufacture of atomic weapons and the stockpiling of material for military purposes cease and that existing stocks of bombs be dismantled. </para>
</item>
<item label="(d)">
<para>provide that all information of inportance for the peaceful use of atomic energy shall be made available to all nations through exchange of personnel and through free and open publication, notwithstanding that some such information may be of some slight military significance. </para>
</item>
<item label="(e)">
<para>accelerate all development for converting atomic energy to peaceful purposes, (/) provide that there shall be a just and equitable sequence for the implementation of all the provisions of the convei'tion, including the provisions set out in (a) to ((i) above, and on acceptance by each of the parties to the convention of all its obligations and sanctions. </para>
</item>
</list>
</subdebate.1>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>Possible Working Plan</title>
<page.no>3492</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>From the outset, therefore, the problem created by the discovery and use of atomic energy should be treated as one integrated whole. Special consideration should be given to its beneficial uses as well as to its destructive power; each measure of international control should go hand in hand with other necessary measures so that each may assist the other and all will tend to create that international trust which is necessary in order to simultaneously remove the dangers and to grasp the benefits presented by this new discovery. </para>
<para>The Commission . has been directed to inquire into all phases of the problem. It is true that four matters haw. been listed in the Assembly resolution and With regard to all of them we are required to make specific proposals. However, these matters are not and cannot be mutually exclusive, but are closely interconnected. The work of the Commission should " proceed by separate stages ". but it seems to me that the Commission should not deal piecemeal with the separate aspects of the problem hut should endeavour to treat the problem as a whole. </para>
<para>Underlying the whole discussion up to date has been the common acceptance of - </para>
<list type="loweralpha">
<item label="(a)">
<para>the idea of some form of international atomic energy authority, and </para>
</item>
<item label="(b)">
<para>the idea that all nations of the world should accept certain obligations regarding the use of atomic energy. </para>
</item>
</list>
<para>In the circumstances,, the Commission should defer for the time being any detailed discussion i-Ofrarding the duration and details of all the steps and stages by which the control of atomic energy will be introduced and developed. We should in the first instance devote ourselves tQ consideration of the basis on which the proposed . international atomic energy authority can be brought into existence, of the obligations which all nations might reasonably be asked to accept in order to give strength and purpose to such an organization and to obtain the benefits which should flow therefrom. </para>
<para>There are certain general principles which should be acceptable to all. For instance, the proposed international atomic energy authority should concern itself both with the prevention of the misuse of the new discovery and with ensuring that its benefits are realized. . Again, it will be generally agreed in principle that as part of the general plan there must be included therein a renunciation by all nations of the use of atomic weapons, a sharing of information and co-operation in the development of atomic energy, and an effective system of inspection and of sanctions to safeguard against any breach of undertakings. </para>
<para>It would also appear inevitable that provision for defining these obligations and constituting the proposed international authority should be contained in a single instrument. </para>
<para>It would therefore appear that one inimedate task before us is to consider the drawing up of a first draft of the heads of such an international instrument as 1 have suggested. I believe that from the statements which have been made before this Commission it is possible for a working committee, composed of representatives from each of the members of this Commission, to prepare a first draft of the main principles of a charter for a world authority to control and develop atomic energy. Such a committee could be set to work immediately with this task before it. It should readily discover those points of fundamental principle on which we are all agreed. The Committee would of course have before it, not only Mi". Baruch's statement but also the observations, criticisms and suggestions which have been made by the other eleven members of the Commission. Subject to the supervision of the Commission, the Committee should have . power to appoint subcommittees. It should report regularly to this Commission the progress made by it in working out and drafting one integrated plan to be embodied in the international instrument. </para>
<para>The people of the world are following the proceedings of this Commission with great, anxiety and concern. They are looking to us for prompt action. They will not be satisfied with expressions of mere Hopes and aspirations. They are demanding a plan which will at once remove a great fear from their hearts and bring' thein closer to the benefits that scientists and - technicians of this age can and will make available from the bountiful forces of nature. </para>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3492</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>DENTISTS</title>
<page.no>3492</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3492</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KZR</name.id>
<electorate>BALACLAVA, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WHITE, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Mr WHITE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Prime Minis ter give the Australian Dental Association the opportunity to recommend a number of ex-service dentists for post- graduate study, in the United States of America, expenses to he met from the lend-lease settlement fund for the promotion of cultural and ' educational relations between the United States of America and Australia? Is the Prime Minister aware that Australian medical ex-servicemen have already- been selected and have gone overseas, arid that- dentists of other countries are already in the United States of America? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3492</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>A48</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">CHIFLEY, Ben</name>
<name role="display">Mr CHIFLEY</name>
</talker>
<para>- There is a provision in the agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the United Sta-tes of America that a part of the money to be paid by Australia in settlement of lend-lease obligations shall be used iu Australia to promote educational and cultural relations between the two countries. I am not sure that this provision was intended to cover the sending of Australians to the United States of America for the purpose mentioned .by the honorable member. How-' ever, I shall 'have the matter examined, and the honorable member will be informed of the result, either before the House rises, or afterwards by letter. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>WHEAT INDUSTRY</title>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JS9</name.id>
<electorate>CALARE, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">BREEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr BREEN</name>
</talker>
<para>- Has the Minister for Commerce and Agriculture seen in this morning's 'press a cable message relating to the international -wheat market wherein, it is stated, that the Canadian Government is making long term contracts for the sale of wheat to the United Kingdom at approximately 7s. 6d. a bushel, whereas the price in the United States of America is 12s. 6d. a bushel; and, further, that the Canadian Government is selling some wheat on the open market and retaining some with which to fulfil its contractual obligations? Will the Minister have a statement prepared on the fluctuations of the wheat market? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have not yet had time to read the newspapers to-day, but f shall make inquiries about long-term contracts between Canada and the United Kingdom for the sale of wheat. My impression is that the present contract covers one season only. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>009MB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">MCEWEN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr McEwen</name>
</talker>
<para>- Two seasons. </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KQB</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SCULLY, William</name>
<name role="display">Mr SCULLY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I think there is a provision for a reduction of price in the second season. However, I shall have inquiries made. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>CIVIL AVIATION</title>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para>Aerodromes for Country Towns - Cambridge Aerodrome</para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>C7E</name.id>
<electorate>COWPER, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">PAGE, Earle</name>
<name role="display">Sir EARLE PAGE</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister for Air make available in the immediate future an officer to go through the north-coast district of New South Wales and advise local authorities at such places as Wingham, Taree, Kempsey, Coffs Harbour and Grafton regarding the measures necessary to put aerodromes into a condition to meet official requirements? The Kempsey aerodrome, which was used throughout the war, has now been declared unsuitable, and local councils are searching for a new site. In view of the expanding housing programmes in the other towns mentioned, and other public works which are being undertaken, it is necessary that the local governing authorities ' should know clearly what they should do to prevent the alienation of Crown lands so that they will be available in the future as sites for aerodromes. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCM</name.id>
<electorate>MARIBYRNONG, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Air</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DRAKEFORD, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr DRAKEFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- The right honorable member's question has application to the whole of Australia, as many requests are being received for the development of aerodromes throughout the Commonwealth. It is true that some aerodromes which were in use during the war are not now considered suitable, in view of the higher standards necessary to ensure safe travel. From time to time the Commonwealth Government has made skilled officers available to advise local governing bodies as to suitable sites for aerodromes and their development. That policy will be continued. Requests for the services of surveyors and engineers to inspect sites have been received in such numbers that, sufficient skilled men to do the work are not available. Consequently, the right honorable gentleman may have to wait for some time for his request to be complied with, but I assure him that I am sympathetic towards the idea of lending the services of skilled technicians to advise local governing bodies in all matters affecting; aerodromes. I shall endeavour to have an officer made available as soon as possible to report on the matters to which the right honorable gentleman has referred, but I cannot promise him that that will be done in the immediate future. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3493</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>K0E</name.id>
<electorate>DENISON, TASMANIA</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">GAHA, John</name>
<name role="display">Dr GAHA</name>
</talker>
<para>- I understand that expansion of the Cambridge aerodrome is being investigated. I doubt whether an aerodrome so far removed from Hobart, which it is supposed to serve, makes air travel any great advantage to the city, but, in the event of the investigation disclosing that the aerodrome connot be expanded to meet the needs of civil aviation, will the Minister for Civil Aviation consider the establishment of a high-class flying boat service on the eastern' littoral " of Australia? </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCM</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DRAKEFORD, Arthur</name>
<name role="display">Mr DRAKEFORD</name>
</talker>
<para>- It is' quite unlikely that flying boats could be used in the existing commercial land services, or in land services likely to be established' in the future. I shall examine the matter to see whether a more satisfactory service can be established. An investigation has already been made into the adequacy of the Cambridge aerodrome, and I have been advised that the aerodrome can be extended to meet likely requirements in the future. Without wishing to raise any controversy on the matter, I believe that the Cambridge aerodrome at present is adequate to meet the normal requirements of the population in the southern portion of Tasmania. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>RE-ESTABLISHMENT</title>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<para class="block">Land Settlement of ex- Servicemen. </para>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWU</name.id>
<electorate>EDEN-MONARO, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role>Minister for Trade and Customs</role>
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRASER, Allan</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRASER</name>
</talker>
<para>- As the acquisition of large estates is a protracted business, and as the minimum number of soldiers who can obtain land from an. individual owner is at present three, can the Minister for Post-war Reconstruction say whether the Government will assist one ex-serviceman to acquire land for his own use? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLZ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANTHONY, Hubert</name>
<name role="display">Mr Anthony</name>
</talker>
<para>- Why did not the honorable member vote with the Opposition on that point? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWU</name.id>
<electorate>EDEN-MONARO, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRASER, Allan</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRASER</name>
</talker>
<para>- Many land-holders <inline font-style="italic">who</inline> arenot able to make sufficient land available for three ex-servicemen could make land available for one farm. Can the. Minister say whether the Commonwealth Government prevents the acquisition of properties capable of settling only one ex-serviceman? Is the Government opposed to the acquisition of one-soldier properties, or does it insist that such properties must be balloted for? As the State Act ofNew South Wales contains a provision for an advance of £5,000 for single farm units, why does the Common- wealth Government prevent . that provision from being put into operation? </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLZ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANTHONY, Hubert</name>
<name role="display">Mr Anthony</name>
</talker>
<para>- I rise to order. Is the honorable member in order in making a statement that is debatable on a matter that has already been decided by this House? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>10000</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">SPEAKER, Mr</name>
<name role="display">Mr SPEAKER</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have followed the honorable member' for Eden-Monaro closely, notwithstanding the din of interjections, arid so farhe has not intro duced debate' into his question. He has the right to ask a question in his own way so long as it does not transgress the Standing Orders.'' </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Mr.FRASER. - As the acquisition of land for one ex-serviceman is in accord with the wishes of returned soldiers' organizations, can the Minister say whether he is able to give effect to that desire ? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- In order that the position relating to single-farm purchase may be made perfectly clear, I shall defer replying to the honorable member's question until to-morrow. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JLZ</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">ANTHONY, Hubert</name>
<name role="display">Mr ANTHONY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister, when replying to-morrow, deal with the question of increasing the limit of £1,000 on establishment loans to a more appropriate sum ? Will he also give consideration to amending the provision whereby farmers' sons who were 21 years of age or more at date of. enlistment, are excluded from the re-establishment benefits. </para>
</talk.start>
<continue>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KCF</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">DEDMAN, John</name>
<name role="display">Mr DEDMAN</name>
</talker>
<para>- I shall give consideration to the matters that the honorable member has raised.. </para>
</talk.start>
</continue>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>SS. KATOOMBA</title>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate>MORETON, QUEENSLAND</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr FRANCIS</name>
</talker>
<para>- Have members of the" </para>
</talk.start>
<para>Waterside Workers Federation or . other waterside workers refused -to load cargo into the former Australian liner <inline font-style="italic">Katoomba,</inline> which has been purchased by. a foreign company? Is the refusal due to their claim, that the crew shouldbe paid Australian rates and that the vessel, should sail under Australian articles? Is this the general attitude of the waterside workers towards. Australian vessels sold to foreign companies, and to vessels owned by foreign companies trading with this country? If so, how does the Government propose to safeguard our overseas trade ? </para>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KHL</name.id>
<electorate>MELBOURNE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>FLP; ALP from 1936</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLLOWAY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr HOLLOWAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- I have no knowledge of the matters to which the honorable member refers, and, therefore, I cannot answer the question. </para>
</talk.start>
<interjection>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>JWT</name.id>
<electorate />
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FRANCIS, Josiah</name>
<name role="display">Mr Francis</name>
</talker>
<para>- Will the Minister make inquiries to ascertain the position? </para>
</talk.start>
</interjection>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3494</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>KHL</name.id>
<electorate>MELBOURNE, VICTORIA</electorate>
<party>FLP; ALP from 1936</party>
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">HOLLOWAY, Edward</name>
<name role="display">Mr HOLLOWAY</name>
</talker>
<para>- Yes. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>
<debate>
<debateinfo>
<title>QUESTION</title>
<page.no>3495</page.no>
<type>Questions</type>
</debateinfo>
<subdebate.1>
<subdebateinfo>
<title>TINNED PLATE</title>
<page.no>3495</page.no>
</subdebateinfo>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3495</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>L1A</name.id>
<electorate>ROBERTSON, NEW SOUTH WALES</electorate>
<party />
<role />
<in.gov>0</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">WILLIAMS, Thomas</name>
<name role="display">Mr WILLIAMS</name>
</talker>
<para>- I ask the Minister representing the Minister for Trade and. Customs whether any licences have been granted recently by the Department of Import Procurement for the importation of tinned plate from the United States of America, other than those granted as the result ' of applications approved and sponsored by the Tinplate Control Board ? IT such licences have been granted, will the Minister indicate to whom they were issued, when they were granted, and the tonnage involved ? </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
<speech>
<talk.start>
<talker>
<page.no>3495</page.no>
<time.stamp />
<name.id>F4U</name.id>
<electorate />
<party>ALP</party>
<role />
<in.gov>1</in.gov>
<first.speech>0</first.speech>
<name role="metadata">FORDE, Francis Michael</name>
<name role="display">Mr FORDE</name>
</talker>
<para>- As this question will necessitate some inquiry and research, I shall discuss it with my colleague, the Minister for Trade and Customs, and endeavour to supply to-morrow the information desired by the honorable member. </para>
</talk.start>
</speech>
</subdebate.1>
</debate>